Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tom Waits for RIO
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTom Waits for RIO

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2011 at 13:02
Originally posted by Deathrabbit Deathrabbit wrote:

Unrelated might be a bit strongly worded, but there are still very stark contrasts in the two styles, and one has a temporal designation as well.

I also wouldn't call it stark, compared to the other subgenres on the site. Temporal designations are irrelevant and useless.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Failcore View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 4625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2011 at 13:10
I dunno, man. I've never had trouble distinguishing Univers Zero from Captain Beefheart.
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2011 at 13:11
Motley Crue for Prog Metal.  Thumbs Up
 
I'm not familiar with a lot of Tom Waits material, but what I have heard strikes me as avant singer/songwriter fare. 
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2011 at 13:17
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Waits is rejected for RIO/Avant, see the posts from David, Keishiro and Jon (in the previous thread), that's three team members out of four. 
Thumbs Up There you have it! Also as per Evolver's notes above Waits can be assessed in crossover. Being controversial we would need unanimous votes from the team though and if Avant don't fit I am not sure where does.....
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2011 at 13:24
If he joins up with Steven Wilson & Tim Bowness, they could do a project called "Tom Waits For No-Man".
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
Sheavy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 28 2010
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 2866
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2011 at 18:44
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

Originally posted by The Hemulen The Hemulen wrote:

Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:

You don't necessarily have to be good to be 'Prog Related'  you could (I guess) be rubbish prog!  (Although some might say thats impossible).


It's not. LOL

Re: Prog-Related, I think it's genuinely hard to point to any particular Tom Waits album and say "that's a rock album", let alone "that's a prog rock album". He's primarily a blues/jazz artist, so there's not much to get a grip on from a rock perspective. Say what you like about Blue Oyster Cult and Deep Purple, but they were rock bands and (in the case of the latter at least, I'm not all that clued up on BOC) they knew how to push the envelope when they felt like it, even if that wasn't all that often.

That Tom Waits was and remains a unique and experimental force within his genre is not in any doubt, but his relationship with progressive rock is tenuous at best.

I'm glad my previous post was helpful, by the way. Whatever it may seem like, we really do make informed choices when it comes to suggestions and try not to let personal taste cloud our judgement. I realise it's not always a very transparent process, but it's the best we can do.

 
BUT this is after all a prog rock resource. 

 
 
I still don't understand why it isn't called Progrockarchives.Confused
Back to Top
Andy Webb View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: June 04 2010
Location: Terria
Status: Offline
Points: 13298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2011 at 18:46
Originally posted by Sheavy Sheavy wrote:

Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

Originally posted by The Hemulen The Hemulen wrote:

Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:

You don't necessarily have to be good to be 'Prog Related'  you could (I guess) be rubbish prog!  (Although some might say thats impossible).


It's not. LOL

Re: Prog-Related, I think it's genuinely hard to point to any particular Tom Waits album and say "that's a rock album", let alone "that's a prog rock album". He's primarily a blues/jazz artist, so there's not much to get a grip on from a rock perspective. Say what you like about Blue Oyster Cult and Deep Purple, but they were rock bands and (in the case of the latter at least, I'm not all that clued up on BOC) they knew how to push the envelope when they felt like it, even if that wasn't all that often.

That Tom Waits was and remains a unique and experimental force within his genre is not in any doubt, but his relationship with progressive rock is tenuous at best.

I'm glad my previous post was helpful, by the way. Whatever it may seem like, we really do make informed choices when it comes to suggestions and try not to let personal taste cloud our judgement. I realise it's not always a very transparent process, but it's the best we can do.

 
BUT this is after all a prog rock resource. 

 
 
I still don't understand why it isn't called Progrockarchives.Confused

Because prog is synonymous with prog rock and ProgRockArchives is just damn redundant. 


Edited by Andyman1125 - October 18 2011 at 18:47
Back to Top
The Truth View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2011 at 19:02
Prog is actually just slang for progressive rock although it could refer to anything that's progressive. I believe progressive rock fans are the ones who coined the term though.
Back to Top
Andy Webb View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: June 04 2010
Location: Terria
Status: Offline
Points: 13298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2011 at 19:32
Well sure, prog could also mean anything progressive. But also the subtitle of the website is "Your ultimate prog rock resource."

Edited by Andyman1125 - October 18 2011 at 19:33
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2011 at 13:42
As a denizen of many a record/CD store for more than 40 years, I have yet to find Waits' album in any section other than rock.
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2011 at 06:28
I cant see it - Tom Waits is like Scott Walker =- avant but not prog.
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2011 at 06:35
Certain artists seem to evoke a strange fear in some members here.  Tom Waits seems to be one of them.  The Grateful Dead are another. (I am not a Dead Head - I like 3 or 4 of their albums. that's it)  The Dead have a handful of prog albums, more than some accepted bands, and without them we might not have other bands, like Phish or Umphrey's McGee.  Their influence is indeniable. 
 
Waits started out as a bluesy singer/songwriter, but branched out into experimental territory in the eighties.  I haven't followed him since, but what I have by him is out there.
I still think he should be allowed to be evaluated by the crossover team. We've had a hell of a lot of bands that are less progressive thrown our way.
 
In my opinion, it is more important for us to be inclusive than exclusive.  We should celebrate any artist's pushing of the boundaries.


Edited by Evolver - October 20 2011 at 06:45
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 12422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2011 at 07:08
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Certain artists seem to evoke a strange fear in some members here.  Tom Waits seems to be one of them.  The Grateful Dead are another. (I am not a Dead Head - I like 3 or 4 of their albums. that's it)  The Dead have a handful of prog albums, more than some accepted bands, and without them we might not have other bands, like Phish or Umphrey's McGee.  Their influence is indeniable. 
 


They were a big influence on Miles going fusion as well.

Only thing I have to add is I think Waits more than qualifies for related or crossover, not so much avant (because he isn't). Blood Money, The Black Rider and most of his albums since 1983 is progressive rock (as in rock that progresses, not as in complex rock), no doubt.

Surely he must have been an influence on modern American avantprog such as Bungle/Secret Chiefs 3/Estradasphere/Sleepytime Gorilla Museum/John Zorn/Marc Ribot...
Back to Top
Marty McFly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2011 at 17:06
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Certain artists seem to evoke a strange fear in some members here.  Tom Waits seems to be one of them.  The Grateful Dead are another. (I am not a Dead Head - I like 3 or 4 of their albums. that's it)  The Dead have a handful of prog albums, more than some accepted bands, and without them we might not have other bands, like Phish or Umphrey's McGee.  Their influence is indeniable. 
 
Waits started out as a bluesy singer/songwriter, but branched out into experimental territory in the eighties.  I haven't followed him since, but what I have by him is out there.
I still think he should be allowed to be evaluated by the crossover team. We've had a hell of a lot of bands that are less progressive thrown our way.
 
In my opinion, it is more important for us to be inclusive than exclusive.  We should celebrate any artist's pushing of the boundaries.

I am with you on this one. I am not that familiar with him, but from what I heard, I am positive he stands SOME chance. I never thought about him in a Crossover way though. Prog-related would be obvious choice, if things weren't so hazy and confused.

There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.