| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Ivan_Melgar_M 
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
 Posted: February 24 2006 at 21:16 |
I was raised with the LP format which usually didn't exceed 45 minutes (I taped so many in 90 minutes cassttes for my first car back in the 80's , two albums per cassette even when a few times I had to fade the volume manually  ).
So I was used to that, but normally don't care about the lenght.
What I don't like are bonus tracks, in most cases sound artificial and obviously are out of their natural context. Leave masterpieces as they were originally recorded.!!!
Iván
|
|
|
 |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 21:21 |
 ivan_2068 wrote:
I was raised with the LP format which usually
didn't exceed 45 minutes (I taped so many in 90 minutes cassttes for my
first car back in the 80's , two albums per cassette even
when a few times I had to fade the volume manually ).
So I was used to that, but normally don't care about the lenght.
What I don't like are bonus tracks, in most cases sound artificial
and obviously are out of their natural context. Leave masterpieces as
they were originally recorded.!!!
Iván |
that's interesting Ivan.... I think the bonus tracks can be really
interesting and an insight into the creative processes. Look at
Tormato and it's bonus tracks.... there are two or three songs
that were done during those sessions that really are as good or better
than nearly anything on that yet for some reason weren't put on the
album (though one ended up on Drama)
|
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 22:31 |
At first, looking at the title, I thought this was another Velvet gang "growing pains" thread , but now I see that it's for grownups....
Ideal length?
21 - 30 minutes... certainly no more than 40!
Any more than that, and you risk serious chafing , and the wife calling a halt to the proceedings (at least until the sober light of dawn)! 
Silly, obsessive, list-making progholes! 
BTW: I used to like "singles" too -- now I can't afford them.
Guess I'm in it for the long-play....
Edited by Peter
|
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 23:01 |
micky wrote:
that's interesting Ivan.... I think the bonus tracks can be really interesting and an insight into the creative processes. Look at Tormato and it's bonus tracks.... there are two or three songs that were done during those sessions that really are as good or better than nearly anything on that yet for some reason weren't put on the album (though one ended up on Drama)
|
I don't deny some songs may be good, but an album reached the status of masterpiece with a determined number of songs in a determined order, all this songs create an atmosphere or a concept.
Anything added can change that, if the artist did it one way originally, I believe it should be kept like that.
Bsnus tracks are great for box sets or for bad albums (Tormato is one of the worst Yes albums) in the first case we pay for those rare recordings, in the second case, bonus tracks can only make better a bad album, and if they make it worst...who cares, it was bad anyway. 
Iván
|
|
|
|
Karn Evil 9
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 14 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 96
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 23:11 |
I would like it if bands now would make albums just short of 80 minutes, since thats how much cds hold. I love getting an album with 70+ minutes of good music because in some cases, its twice what you get on most albums.
and I like bonus tracks sometimes, but in many cases, the songs were left off the origional album for a reason. a perfect example is Burn by Deep Purple the bonus tracks are differant versions of songs on the album that sound almost identical to the first verison.
|
|
Watch out where the huskies go,dont you eat that yellow snow
|
|
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 23:14 |
Since most my cd collection is made up of classic prog and classic rock with a adequate amount of modern rock and modern prog, i am used to listenng to albums that are about 40 minutes to 60 minutes in length.
However, i enjoy live albums that run the full 80 minutes on cd and double live albums. Also, double studio albums TFK's Unfold the Future, are good.
Studio albums that are one cd that run the whole 80 minutes, like Zappa's You Are What You Is, are pretentious and overdone most of the time,
Edited by Asyte2c00
|
|
ChadFromCanada
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 12 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 293
|
Posted: February 24 2006 at 23:50 |
|
For an album, I wish the classic ones were using a format at the time
that would have allowed more than 40 minutes of music per LP.
It'd be nice if they were all 60-70 minutes.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: February 25 2006 at 00:38 |
I see that the 40 - 50 minutes option is the most voted (along with doesn't matter), seems that all the old farts raised with the limited LP format are voting.
Despite being an old fart also, I voted for doesn't matter, the artist should decide the lenght, but keeping always the lenght and tracks of the original release.
Iván
|
|
|
|
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: February 25 2006 at 01:28 |
It really doesn't matter. Quality is the most important aspect. Classics were generally in the 30-50 minute range because of the format limitations, and that works for me; it's great music, and it doesn't take up too much time. Roine Stolt and Neal Morse are great examples of long material outputs. Neal has put out at least one 60+ minute album every year since 1999, and Roine at least one 60+ minute album every year since 1994, and for the most part, it's quality material, though some is awfully time consuming and difficult to get through in one sitting. I'm kind of ranting a bit, but the point is, I'm happy either way, as long as it's quality.
|
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph
 
|
|
Prog-jester
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 05 2005
Location: Love Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 5908
|
Posted: February 25 2006 at 03:28 |
It DOES matter.I'm tired with silly 70-min albums filled with stupid tracks which might be archived for a bonus releases.I'd throw away few tracks from every DT's 70-min album.
Why overload someone?I think, 35-60 min is ideal lenght.
I voted 51-60,to be honest 
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Ideal Length
