Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Gentle giant-With or without Philip?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedGentle giant-With or without Philip?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: When did they produce their best albums (or your favorites)
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
10 [58.82%]
7 [41.18%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Runaway View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Gentle giant-With or without Philip?
    Posted: October 20 2005 at 00:34
Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him...
Back to Top
Mategra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 23 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 592
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 03:22

My favourite GG albums are:

In a Glass House
The Power and the Glory
Free Hand
Interview

all without Phil

The best Phil-era album is Three Friends, imho.

Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 04:52
Definitely with. Their sound had a much greater variety with him.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 05:01

With, with, with!

Friede said it all, and what can I do but agree?

Back to Top
magog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 06 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 218
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 06:37
Originally posted by Runaway Runaway wrote:

Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him...


The same for me...I've never thought of this problem...good idea
Back to Top
Flip_Stone View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 388
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 13:02

That's hard to say.  I think both "eras" of the band are equally good, although the music and focus is different.  The early stuff is obviously more progressive and interesting, but the later stuff is more refined and somewhat more listenable.

 

Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 13:28
Originally posted by Runaway Runaway wrote:

Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him...


good question and considering my four favorite albums are split between with and without him. I guess I can say, I enjoy Gentle Giant whether it is with or without him ha ha hah. However if I HAD to choose, it would be with him. 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 20:14

Without Phil, though Octopus is my favorite. They had more variety with Phil, yes, but the post-Octopus albums are slightly better generally, IMO.

RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 21:13

I liked the sax and trumpet...when Phil left those did as well.

So i will say with Phil for dirversity sake, tho the albums they made without him are better.

Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2005 at 22:24
Definitely with Phil ... for me ... but then again, I'm one of those who thinks Power And The Glory is the least enjoyable of their first six albums ...
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Ray Lomas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2005 at 03:43
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Definitely with. Their sound had a much greater variety with him.


Yes, I absolutely agree. All those horns and saxophones are great, I also like his voice.
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2005 at 08:58

Oooh... looks like I'll be the voice of controversy.

When Phil left the band got tighter and more focused, AND stopped filling their albums with obscure literary allusions. They didn't lose out musically as Ray could play trumpet too and Kerry handled the softer vocals nicely (albeit never live ). IAGH to Interview showed GG at their creative peak.

Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2005 at 11:20
You disappoint me, Trousie; I would have bet you vote for GG with Phil. And I certainly don't agree they were at their creative peak without him. Tighter and more focused, yes; but that's rather something to deplore. I like them freaky and wild. Though I like GG after Phil left too, but my preference is the early period.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Badabec View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 14 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1313
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 19 2005 at 10:08
It's not that Phil wouldn't be a good musician (no doubt about it). But most of the band-members didn't want to have him in Gentle Giant anymore I think. So it was better for Gentle Giant when he left.


Edited by Badabec
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 20 2005 at 16:14
Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

Oooh... looks like I'll be the voice of controversy.

When Phil left the band got tighter and more focused, AND stopped filling their albums with obscure literary allusions. They didn't lose out musically as Ray could play trumpet too and Kerry handled the softer vocals nicely (albeit never live ). IAGH to Interview showed GG at their creative peak.

yep.

IAGH, The Power and the Glory, Interview are all better than the Phil era albums.

nothing they did is 'bad' though 70-77

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.