Gentle giant-With or without Philip?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=13296
Printed Date: January 09 2025 at 18:49 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Gentle giant-With or without Philip?
Posted By: Runaway
Subject: Gentle giant-With or without Philip?
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 00:34
Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him...
|
Replies:
Posted By: Mategra
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 03:22
My favourite GG albums are:
In a Glass House The Power and the Glory Free Hand Interview
all without Phil
The best Phil-era album is Three Friends, imho.
|
Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 04:52
Definitely with. Their sound had a much greater variety with him.
-------------
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
Posted By: Moogtron III
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 05:01
With, with, with!
Friede said it all, and what can I do but agree?
|
Posted By: magog
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 06:37
Runaway wrote:
Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him... |
The same for me...I've never thought of this problem...good idea
|
Posted By: Flip_Stone
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 13:02
That's hard to say. I think both "eras" of the band are equally good, although the music and focus is different. The early stuff is obviously more progressive and interesting, but the later stuff is more refined and somewhat more listenable.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 13:28
Runaway wrote:
Well, philips's era was more consistent, but they made my fav without him... |
good question and considering my four favorite albums are split between
with and without him. I guess I can say, I enjoy Gentle Giant whether
it is with or without him ha ha hah. However if I HAD to choose, it
would be with him.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 20:14
Without Phil, though Octopus is my favorite. They had more variety with Phil, yes, but the post-Octopus albums are slightly better generally, IMO.
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 21:13
I liked the sax and trumpet...when Phil left those did as well.
So i will say with Phil for dirversity sake, tho the albums they made without him are better.
------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
Posted By: Trotsky
Date Posted: October 20 2005 at 22:24
Definitely with Phil ... for me ... but then again, I'm one of those who thinks Power And The Glory is the least enjoyable of their first six albums ...
------------- "Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
Posted By: Ray Lomas
Date Posted: October 21 2005 at 03:43
BaldFriede wrote:
Definitely with. Their sound had a much greater variety with him. |
Yes, I absolutely agree. All those horns and saxophones are great, I also like his voice.
|
Posted By: The Hemulen
Date Posted: October 21 2005 at 08:58
Oooh... looks like I'll be the voice of controversy.
When Phil left the band got tighter and more focused, AND stopped filling their albums with obscure literary allusions. They didn't lose out musically as Ray could play trumpet too and Kerry handled the softer vocals nicely (albeit never live ). IAGH to Interview showed GG at their creative peak.
|
Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: October 21 2005 at 11:20
You disappoint me, Trousie; I would have bet you vote for GG with Phil.
And I certainly don't agree they were at their creative peak without
him. Tighter and more focused, yes; but that's rather something to
deplore. I like them freaky and wild. Though I like GG after Phil left
too, but my preference is the early period.
-------------
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
Posted By: Badabec
Date Posted: November 19 2005 at 10:08
It's not that Phil wouldn't be a good musician (no doubt about it). But most of the
band-members didn't want to have him in Gentle Giant anymore I think.
So it was better for Gentle Giant when he left.
|
Posted By: NetsNJFan
Date Posted: November 20 2005 at 16:14
Trouserpress wrote:
Oooh... looks like I'll be the voice of controversy.
When Phil left the band got tighter and more focused, AND stopped filling their albums with obscure literary allusions. They didn't lose out musically as Ray could play trumpet too and Kerry handled the softer vocals nicely (albeit never live ). IAGH to Interview showed GG at their creative peak.
|
yep.
IAGH, The Power and the Glory, Interview are all better than the Phil era albums.
nothing they did is 'bad' though 70-77
-------------
|
|