Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why didn't Les Pauls have tremolo bar?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy didn't Les Pauls have tremolo bar?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why didn't Les Pauls have tremolo bar?
    Posted: January 18 2013 at 09:51
When thinking about 70's classic electric guitars there are 2 clear protagonists, the Fender Strat and the Gibson Les Paul. Each one had its own personality, both sound-wise and looks-wise.

But one thing that always intrigued me, in terms of playing versatility, the Strat had a tremolo bar while the original genuine Les Paul didn't.
Many Les Paul players fitted tremolo bar bridges in their guitars (i.e. Steve Hackett) but the question remains, why did not Gibson fit a tremolo bar as standard in the Les Pauls?

The Les Paul was an amazing guitar, in some respects possibly better sounding than the Start, but being able to do only upwards pitch-bends but no downwards pitch-bends seems a stupid limitation for such a great guitar.

Anyone can throw some light on this question?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:22
Two different guitars. I guess really the Gibson Les Paul should be compared to the Telecaster, the Strat with the Gibson SG.
 
I've always assumed (yeah, I know, a bad habit) that it was to do with the sound, and more specifically the fabled LP sustain - a rigid bridge coupled with the humbucker pickups and the glued on neck results in a fuller sound with more sustain than the single pickups, tremolo bridge and bolt-on neck of the Strat.
 
 
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:33
You could always get a Custom Les Paul with a tremelo arm.
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:37
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Two different guitars. I guess really the Gibson Les Paul should be compared to the Telecaster, the Strat with the Gibson SG. 
The SG didn't have a tremolo bar bridge either. 
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:38
^The ones I have seen do.
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:45
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

You could always get a Custom Les Paul with a tremelo arm.
I know, the question is how come Std Les Pauls did not include tremolo when it was a clearly desirable playing effect at the time (and still now of course). Did Gibson miss the importance of this effect for guitar players?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:46
^^ SG trems are model dependant

Edited by Dean - January 18 2013 at 10:47
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:47
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ it's model dependant

Is this in answer to  the SG whammy bar?

I see it was.Smile


Edited by Snow Dog - January 18 2013 at 10:47
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:50
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

^The ones I have seen do.
Do a Google Images search on "Gibson SG" and tell me how many you see with a tremolo bar. You will indeed see a very few but the Std SG's did not have it.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:51
OK
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:54
I get both. Without in the majority, but plenty with too. I suppose I never really noticed the "withouts" before as much
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 10:57

SGs are simply less common than LPs, just as Teles are less common than Strats. You can get Teles with and without trems too.

What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 11:01
Originally posted by Gerinski Gerinski wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

You could always get a Custom Les Paul with a tremelo arm.
I know, the question is how come Std Les Pauls did not include tremolo when it was a clearly desirable playing effect at the time (and still now of course). Did Gibson miss the importance of this effect for guitar players?
One other factor was probably keeping the guitar in tune - guitars with trems (especially old trems) don't stay in tune, that's why Floyd-Rose invented the locking tremolo. Mr Les Paul probably considered staying in tune was more important than excessive whammy abuse.
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 11:03
The Les Paul is incredibly popular without anyway. It is obviously not such a desired thing anyway. 
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2013 at 15:39
Unless I missed something here it was because of the design of the body.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
HackettFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2013 at 20:31
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Unless I missed something here it was because of the design of the body.


Yeah, installation is trickier on guitars with a carved top versus a flat top. Lots of Floyd Rose users prefer the tremolo flush with the bridge. This saves the tuning of the other five strings if a string breaks. This is not an option on the Les Paul for some physical design reason. If memory serves me, it's because the strings do not come in from the back through the body of the guitar as they do on Strats and Strat-like guitars. They come from the front on a Les Paul through the bridge.   To have it flush, you actually have to gauge a hole in the body for the tremolo to pivot downward. I've seen one customized like this at a second hand shop, very distressing. I could only hope it was an imitation Les Paul.   A Floyd Rose on a Les Paul needs to be elevated or "floating". You can get the elevated or "floating" installation of a Floyd Rose on a Les Paul Classic Custom, the kind Steve Hackett has. I wanted one of these but it's a little shy of twice as much as the Les Paul Classic Plus that I now sleep with.

Edited by HackettFan - January 21 2013 at 08:24
Back to Top
bonestorm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2013 at 19:00
My first guitar was an Ibanez that had a floyd-rose.  It was a complete nuisance to keep in tune.  When I upgraded to a Les Paul I've never missed it, but I guess it's not my playing style to use it much anyway.
Hibernal http://hibernal.bandcamp.com
"This is a stunning work of art" - Muzik Reviews
"A precious gem" - Dante's Prog
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2013 at 20:48
Because trems are garbage bridges.  Kills sustain, intonation & tuning integrity, especially in the 1950s
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2013 at 22:26
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

Because trems are garbage bridges.  Kills sustain, intonation & tuning integrity, especially in the 1950s

Good answer!  The Les Paul was originally intended as an upscale guitar, and Les himself saw it more for jazz-clubs, dance bands etc.  (especially the "Black Beauty" Les Paul Custom). 

One of the tonal secrets to the Les Paul, and the source of its amazing sustain, is its construction and integrity of design...the carved top is a cap of flame maple glued onto a solid mahogany body...this cap is very hard and allows the energy from the vibrating strings to propagate from nut to bridge, providing a nice ringing sustain.  Players who have used this to maximum advantage include Fripp and Hackett.  

Although certain Gibson guitar designs (SG, Flying V) have used the Gibson "vibrola," I don't think they were ever used on the Les Paul.  The Vibrola isn't bad, but tuning is a problem & I only know a few who used it extensively (Andy Powell of Wisbhone Ash comes to mind).  A few players installed Bigsby vibratos on their LPs, but those are notorious sustain killers! 


Fripp is an interesting character....although he used a non-trem Les Paul Custom through much of the formative years of King Crimson, he adopted the Roland synth-guitar system for the "Discipline" era, and his guitar had a factory trem (I've spoken to him about it).  I think Adrian Belew, who was a "Twang-Bar King," had an influence on Bob!!  

Later on (Thrak period), Bob had the Fernandes company in Japan build him a Les Paul Custom copy that incorporated advanced synth pickups, Fernandes sustainer, and built-in trem!!   His 1953 LP Custom was far too valuable to risk traveling with, and the new Fernandes guitar allowed him to trigger synth patches such as Mellotron samples....amazing to watch!!   This guitar is the secret weapon behind his "Soundscapes" techniques:


Sorry for the dissertation!  I own both trem-equipped guitars (Charvel Model 6) and non-trem guitars (Les Paul etc.).  At most, I use the trem to impart a slight "wiggle" or shimmer to notes, particularly during solos.  I avoid the hair-metal "dive bomb" sound effect completely, as I don't think it is a very dignified/musical tone! 





Edited by cstack3 - April 12 2013 at 11:57
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2013 at 22:33
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

Because trems are garbage bridges.  Kills sustain, intonation & tuning integrity, especially in the 1950s

Good answer!  The Les Paul was originally intended as an upscale guitar, and Les himself saw it more for jazz-clubs, dance bands etc.  (especially the "Black Beauty" Les Paul Custom). 

One of the tonal secrets to the Les Paul, and the source of its amazing sustain, is its construction and integrity of design...the carved top is a cap of flame maple glued onto a solid mahogany body...this cap is very hard and allows the energy from the vibrating strings to propagate from nut to bridge, providing a nice ringing sustain.  Players who have used this to maximum advantage include Fripp and Hackett.  

Although certain Gibson guitar designs (SG, Flying V) have used the Gibson "vibrola," I don't think they were ever used on the Les Paul.  The Vibrola isn't bad, but tuning is a problem & I only know a few who used it extensively (Andy Powell of Wisbhone Ash comes to mind).  A few players installed Bigsby vibratos on their LPs, but those are notorious sustain killers! 


Fripp is an interesting character....although he used a non-trem Les Paul Custom through much of the formative years of King Crimson, he adopted the Roland synth-guitar system for the "Discipline" era, and his guitar had a factory trem (I've spoken to him about it).  I think Adrian Belew, who was a "Twang-Bar King," had an influence on Bob!!  

Later on (Thrak period), Bob had the Fernandes company in Japan build him a Les Paul Custom copy that incorporated advanced synth pickups, Fernandes sustainer, and built-in trem!!   His 1953 LP Custom was far too valuable to risk traveling with, and the new Fernandes guitar allowed him to trigger synth patches such as Mellotron samples....amazing to watch!!   This guitar is the secret weapon behind his "Soundscapes" techniques:


I own both trem-equipped guitars (Charvel Model 6) and non-trem guitars (Les Paul etc.).  At most, I use the trem to impart a slight "wiggle" or shimmer to notes, particularly during solos.  I avoid the hair-metal "dive bomb" sound effect completely, as I don't think it is a very dignified/musical tone! 

Players using trems on Les Pauls these days include Steve Hackett and Alex Lifeson, who has a Gibson signature LP including a whammy!  


Oops, sorry for the dissertation!! 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.169 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.