Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Topic: A Meshuggah discussion Posted: June 24 2009 at 13:11 |
This is not intended to be an appreciation thread as such, but I would not be surprised if it becomes one The reason I wanted to discuss about this particular band is the mixed feelings I have after purchasing Nothing and Chaosphere. To be honest, I had listened to Chaosphere before and was not at all impressed - I was actually amazed at the rating in PA which seems to be quite high. In brief my initial views about these albums Chaosphere: as the title suggests, this album sounds like total chaos, too much noise and hardly any structure. Personally, I don't feel it will grow on me, but I will not stop listening to it until I get a more rounded opinion. Nothing: much more ''reasonable'' structure, ''cleaner'' riffs and more variations seem to create an interesting result. Feels like a more mature approach to the extreme metal side of things while the prog elements are still there. Looking forward to hear your views. Are Meshuggah in overall closer to the first or second description and/or do you agree with the comments for these albums. Feel free to recommend further albums and/or bash the thread creator
Edited by aapatsos - June 24 2009 at 13:12
|
|
brainerd
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 13 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 70
|
Posted: June 24 2009 at 18:44 |
I kind of agree with you, Chaosphere is a bit messily put together in parts. The slightly (and I mean slightly) more diverse approach of the last few releases is an improvement. Some songs on ObZen also work as individual songs whereas most of the stuff from the late 90s onwards only really work in the context of the album, Catch 33 being the most obvious example seeing as it's meant to be all one track anyway.
Am I making sense? I'm probably too tired to be thinking about this sort of thing...
|
|
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: June 24 2009 at 18:48 |
I'd say Chaosphere is their worst album between Destoy Erase Improve and the present. The production isn't the best and songs are very good, but definitely not consistently on par with their other work. I agree with your comments and highly recommend you take a look at the I Ep and Catch 33. They are very mature in songwriting and the production is great on both.
|
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph
|
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 12:53 |
thanks guys I will try to check them out
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 13:46 |
If you think their songs don't have structure, you won't enjoy anything they have released. They aren't for everyone, so I wouldn't be surprised if you never found anything from them you liked. The point of their music isn't to be melodic or traditionally structured; it's to be rhythmic and trance-like. You can't go into a Meshuggah album expecting 4/4 time signatures and melodic singing about Tolkein-esque fantasy worlds. A lot of traditional prog is like that, but Meshuggah is a different breed altogether.
|
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 15:41 |
^ I thought that in particular Chaosphere lacked structure but not really listened to it that many times to make a rounded opinion. Nothing sounded much more structured.
Surely I would not expect any fantasy world and 4/4 signatures as you say - I can clearly understand that they are devoted in tech/extreme prog metal - need to check the rest of their releases anyway but thanks for your comments
|
|
keiser willhelm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1697
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 16:52 |
their songs may sound chaotic but they are so structured it makes most peoples head spin. if meshuggah is about anything,they are about structure. Thats where that whole "how do they play this" thing comes in. chaosphere is disjointed as an album and the songs arent as memorable as the songs off nothing or well... anything they've done.
Favorite meshuggah album is probably catch 33, though I is pretty great too. I heard their rhythm guitarist (not thorendhal) say once that their songs were rhythmic exercises so i really enjoy that aspect of the music. i like picking it appart and attempting to disect the song, which is pretty fun.
|
|
|
keiser willhelm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1697
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 16:53 |
but almost impossible
|
|
|
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 17:00 |
I actually find Chaosphere to be their most interesting. The grooves are simply divine. If you wanna get into the album, just headbang a little bit to the ending of Sane or Neurotica.
|
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg
|
|
zappaholic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 19:51 |
Chaosphere was my first exposure to Meshuggah as well, and I didn't care for it. A few years later I decided to give them another shot and picked up catch thirtythr33. That's the one that hooked me. Since then I've picked up Nothing, I and obZen - all great discs, but catch thirtythr33 is still my favorite.
|
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 21:05 |
zappaholic wrote:
Chaosphere was my first exposure to Meshuggah as well, and I didn't care for it. A few years later I decided to give them another shot and picked up catch thirtythr33. That's the one that hooked me. Since then I've picked up Nothing, I and obZen - all great discs, but catch thirtythr33 is still my favorite.
|
Wow. I have the EXACT same story as you when it comes to my getting into their music. Spooky . . .
|
|
keiser willhelm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1697
|
Posted: June 25 2009 at 21:22 |
p0mt3 wrote:
zappaholic wrote:
Chaosphere was my first exposure to Meshuggah as well, and I didn't care for it. A few years later I decided to give them another shot and picked up catch thirtythr33. That's the one that hooked me. Since then I've picked up Nothing, I and obZen - all great discs, but catch thirtythr33 is still my favorite.
|
Wow. I have the EXACT same story as you when it comes to my getting into their music. Spooky . . .
|
wow. I have the EXACT same story as BOTH of you when it comes to my getting into their music. Spooky . . .
|
|
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 08:03 |
wow... it seems my story would be exactly the same... spooky...
|
|
moe_blunts
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 18 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 617
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 08:19 |
I really love Meshuggah, but it definitely took some time for me to fully "grok" their music. Firstly, I have friends that cover their songs. Listening to the individual instruments is quite remarkable, particularly the drums. Then, put those parts back together. Their music is yet another case of being "more than the sum of its parts."
Seeing them live really sealed the deal. Great band and one of the most influential of the past two decades.
|
|
|
avalanchemaster
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 11:29 |
They are so much better live than on album.... that said, I find their I ep to be their best release. It is just the right length, has just the right changeups and keeps it intense from beginning to end. Catch 33 is somewhat boring imo. Chaosphere is excellent. so is Obzen. Nothing is almost too repititious for me. (yes I get the polyrhythmic interplay) The early material is a different beast all together... very thrashy. Well most of their stuff is somewhat thrashy, but just insanely complex rhythmically.... sort of like african polyrhythmic contortions... call them a love/hate band.... and Thordendahl's solos are just Allan Holdsworth ripoffs.
also, the best related project is not a Meshuggah album at all, but the extremely rare "Fredrick Thordendahl's Special Defects- Sol Niger Within version 3.33" which features more diversity, better songs, and Saxophone in some songs.... like Meshuggah meets jazz.... good stuff for sure!
|
|
|
Ben Enochian
Forum Newbie
Joined: June 24 2009
Location: Portsmouth
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 12:00 |
The Pessimist wrote:
I actually find Chaosphere to be their most interesting. The grooves are simply divine. If you wanna get into the album, just headbang a little bit to the ending of Sane or Neurotica.
|
This. CHAOSPHERE is majestic in my eyes, it's holds some amazing grooves and feels that still blow me away, almost 10 years after it came out. It's all a matter of taste and opinion, but this is one of my fave 3 albums of all time and there is not a bad song on the record that I skip when listening to it. I spent a few months working it all out when it first came out and thus became a much better player, simply by 'ape-ing' the styles of riffage that Fredrik and Martin utilise. ...oh, and Tomas can play drums a little bit too... Live...they are amazing...as they are on record. I think the production of Chaosphere is chaotic, and it's meant to be that way. Daniel Bergstrand did a good job I think.
Edited by Ben Enochian - June 26 2009 at 12:08
|
www.enochiantheory.co.uk
www.myspace.com/enochiantheoryband
"Direction...what we need to achieve..."
|
|
moe_blunts
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 18 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 617
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 12:20 |
avalanchemaster wrote:
and Thordendahl's solos are just Allan Holdsworth ripoffs.
|
that's not a fair assessment.
|
|
|
avalanchemaster
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 13:33 |
moe_blunts wrote:
avalanchemaster wrote:
and Thordendahl's solos are just Allan Holdsworth ripoffs.
|
that's not a fair assessment.
|
I suppose it would offend your sensibilities less if I said that his solos are influenced by Holdsworth.... if you don't agree, well then I would have to question your exposure to Holdsworth....
Edited by avalanchemaster - June 26 2009 at 13:33
|
|
|
moe_blunts
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 18 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 617
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 14:17 |
avalanchemaster wrote:
moe_blunts wrote:
avalanchemaster wrote:
and Thordendahl's solos are just Allan Holdsworth ripoffs.
|
that's not a fair assessment.
|
I suppose it would offend your sensibilities less if I said that his solos are influenced by Holdsworth.... if you don't agree, well then I would have to question your exposure to Holdsworth....
|
holdsworth is in a league of his own. really awkward guy, too, but he sure as hell can play. Fredrik's solos are more ripoffs of beebopjazz saxophone...
Edited by moe_blunts - June 26 2009 at 14:17
|
|
|
Conor Fynes
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 11 2009
Location: Vancouver, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3196
|
Posted: June 26 2009 at 15:19 |
Meshuggah personally, are a band I can appreciate for up to two minutes at a time, before it starts to hurt my brain. :)
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.