Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Tales
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 98
|
Topic: The Who v The Stones v The Who Posted: July 27 2007 at 21:19 |
Who was the greatest ?
Edited by Tales - July 27 2007 at 21:26
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: July 27 2007 at 21:23 |
Tales wrote:
Who was the greatest ? |
who?
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JesusisLord
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: Hawaii
Status: Offline
Points: 320
|
Posted: July 28 2007 at 01:13 |
To give this title to anyone other then the Stones is laughable. The question asks not for the greatest Rock band, but the greatest Rock and Roll. The Stones catalog up thru the 70[s and early 80's define Rock and Roll, with it's attitude and it's swagger. Heck, even the Stones knew they were the best, why else would they have named themselves as The Greatest Rock and Roll Band"
|
And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father. Phillipians 2:11
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: July 28 2007 at 11:07 |
VS threads are useless and vague. Be more specific! Who would win in a fight? Who would snort their father's ashes first? Something specific.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: July 29 2007 at 01:00 |
Love them both, but I love and listen to the Who a lot more than those cool Stones cats.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: July 29 2007 at 18:08 |
I love em both very much. But the Who was the greatest.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
febus
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
|
Posted: August 01 2007 at 09:40 |
The WHO have some 4-5 great classics albums
the ROLING STONES ![Thumbs%20Up](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley20.gif) have maybe 8-10 great albums, a myriad of great singles and still roliing without interruption.....they get my vote!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ClashWho
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 04:57 |
Wow, The Who is running away with this. Anyway, I pick the band that smashed their gear after playing songs about "teenage wastelands" and "dying before getting old" at blistering volumes.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guzzman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 21 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 3563
|
Posted: September 20 2007 at 07:28 |
Since we're far from the end of time there's no sense in naming the Greatest Rock'n'Roll Band of All Times. Or do you know more than I about the end of the world?
|
"We've got to get in to get out"
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Revolver
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 02 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 32
|
Posted: October 02 2007 at 21:30 |
The Stones by far they had far more greater songs than the Who and they are more fun to listen.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: October 02 2007 at 21:33 |
micky wrote:
Tales wrote:
Who was the greatest ? |
who?
|
Guess
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: October 02 2007 at 21:46 |
Shakespeare wrote:
VS threads are useless and vague. Be more specific! Who would win in a fight? Who would snort their father's ashes first? Something specific.
|
That would be the Stones both times.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Hat of Truth
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 13 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 82
|
Posted: October 13 2007 at 04:19 |
I will have to chose The Who. Without them we wouldn't have got Rock Operas. And Tommy is one of my favorite albums of all time.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
fuxi
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2463
|
Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:22 |
febus wrote:
The WHO have some 4-5 great classics albums
the ROLING STONES ![Thumbs%20Up](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley20.gif) have maybe 8-10 great albums, a myriad of great singles..... |
Objectively speaking, you're absolutely right. The Stones have played a far more important role in rock history than the Who and recorded more great music.
Until about a quarter century ago, I loved both bands to death. Even nowadays I think "Jumping Jack Flash" is the greatest rock single ever released!
But ever since STEEL WHEELS (which I enjoyed; I even thought it was some kind of comeback) it has irritated me immensely that the Stones have kept repeating themselves again and again and again. Shamelessly, they've released an even larger number of mediocre albums (both live and studio) than the Who! Mick Jagger's endless preening started getting on my nerves. I kept thinking I really appreciated the Who's madcap humour - at least the way it was until the early seventies. In the past fifteen years or so I've lost most of my affection for the Stones - but I enjoy the Who as much as ever.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Chris H
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 08 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 8191
|
Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:27 |
fuxi makes a great point, The Who has been releasing consistent 3.5/4 star albums their whole career, while The Rolling Stones have aa ton of magnificent albums and rock classics and just as much crap and senseless repitition.
Hard choice, but I say the Stones just because they good outweighs the bad, at least in my opinion.
|
Beauty will save the world.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:34 |
Whaaa?
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
|
Posted: October 16 2007 at 21:46 |
the question should be Who's the Most Rock n' roll?
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Sydwaters
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 16 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 22
|
Posted: October 16 2007 at 23:39 |
Neither one is but I prefer the Stones especially Let It Bleed and Satanic Majesties Request.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
FunnyWays
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 23 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 69
|
Posted: October 23 2007 at 12:46 |
Could never get into the Stones really so would have to be The Who.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: February 08 2008 at 12:51 |
How do I love watching the Stones being deafeted by a much greater band!
The Who rocks!!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.