Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - too heavily weighted ratings ? its outrageous
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedtoo heavily weighted ratings ? its outrageous
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 20:30
Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Russelk, I don't make the rules, they are done by the owners, and they have reasons to do it.

 

Plus the rule is in 100 words, not in 150, which BTW is  a very  rational limit IMO, there's very little to be said in less than 100 words in the case of a review, except I like it , it’s my all time favorite band, a masterpiece that  nobody should avoid etc..

 

A limit must be placed somewhere, and I believe 100 is perfect.

 

This reply has exactly 104 words… Do you believe normally you can review an album in less than this?

 

Iván



???

What? Wazzat? Ivan, I haven't posted on this thread for a week, and I don't have a problem about word limits. Are you sure you didn't mean to critique someone else? Weren't you arguing with NotaProghead?

???
 
Yes, it's a "Lapsus Calami"
 
But the idea remains LOL
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.