Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Clean Vocals or Death Growl? (Modern Prog)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedClean Vocals or Death Growl? (Modern Prog)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 20>
Author
Message
Elderflower Man View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 05 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2010 at 09:37
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by chrijom chrijom wrote:

Never really got the 'cookie monster' thing, just can't take it seriously.  
You can start by not calling it "cookie monster" Stern Smile

I do so hate that term.
Indeed, it's awful.
All your hearts now seem so far from me,
It hardly seems to matter now.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2010 at 09:41
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:


You'd never say that you "hate distorted bass", or that you "prefer violin to cello". Stupid, right? 

That's not a good comparison, a cello is just a deeper, more low pitched instrument, it can essentially etch out a moving - in the physical and not emotional sense - melodic line just like a violin.  Death growls usually centre around the same notes, performing a very similar function to metal riffs in fact.  While it is eminently suited to some forms of music - and indeed I wouldn't want Cannibal Corpse without Chris Barnes's guttural 'emissions' LOL -  it is also a limited style of vocals compared to clean singing as a whole.  In essence, it's not even a fair question because death growl is just one style within the larger subset of harsh vocal techniques while clean vocals is a whole wide basket by itself.  I would have to assume there's something wrong with the tastes of someone who prefers "death growl" to clean vocals because he would be limiting himself to a very narrow range of vocals.  If by clean vocals, only one specific style of clean singing is meant, it is a more pertinent question.

By the way, I do prefer music with clean guitar, especially jazz guitar.  Er, not because I find distorted tones strange but because clean guitar seems to accompany more harmonically interesting music as a general rule.   I get a bit bored of listening to the same ( not to be taken literally!!!!) riffs over and over and I hope that doesn't sound oh so prejudiced to you.Wink
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2010 at 11:33
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:

Well, the question is like "clean guitars or distorted guitars"? 
There may be strange people who "can't take" distorted guitar sound, it makes them laugh, their ears start to ache, etc. At least, so they say :) But I'm sure that 99,9% people here understand that the thing that matters is the way you use this stuff. I'm sure that "not taking" extreme vocal at all is always prejudice. You see, types of vocals are like types of instruments. Take it that way. You can use them badly, as you can use clean vocals badly. 

I would go further by saying that in fact there are no TWO types of vocals :) There are different types pf clean vocals and extreme vocals. And how they sound varies significantly from singer to singer. 

I used "not to take" the extreme vocals at all, I also called them "not singing"... But then I understood - hell, that's what you need in heavy music! Can you imagine Meshuggah with clean vocals? wtf?! Can't you feel the emotion in Townsend's screams and growls? It's a new instrument found in one's throat!

So, be open-minded, and listen to that instrument in the context of music.
You'd never say that you "hate distorted bass", or that you "prefer violin to cello". Stupid, right? Narrow-minded, right?) So why do you say "I can't take extreme vocals"? That's the same thing... You can't compare them. 

You know, music (including vocals) of Opeth, Meshuggah, Townsend, Cynic, etc, is so damn different! It's ringing so different bells! And the vocals are so *different*! If you're putting all these types if vocals in the same basket... I think you should reconsider :) 
 
Nahh....most of this I don't agree/understand.....Just because someone does not like, or in your words"not taking", extreme vocals is always prejudice....That's wrong, if someone does not like the vocals has nothing with prejudice.
 
Of course the human throat is an instrument, it makes noises and sounds just like a trumpet.....but not all instruments make sounds we all like or simply don't make good sounds.
There are plenty of times I would prefer a violin to cello and vice-versa, piano to a synthesizer........
 
Screaming is extreme vocals, rap is extreme vocals, growling is extreme vocals........I can handle the first two way more than I can handle growling.
But I don't consider that prejudice.
Back to Top
LinusW View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2010 at 13:21
I've never been able to stomach growling, unfortunately. I hear great music behind it, but sadly it's already ruined. Perhaps it's something you can get used to, because I feel I might be missing out on some great stuff. 

Edited by LinusW - November 28 2010 at 13:21
Back to Top
Matthew T View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 01 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5291
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2010 at 14:13
When I first heard Opeth years ago,I thought you have to be joking but over time I have come to love it. As you all know we have Pavarotti and those other two Tenors and we also have Lars Mikael Åkerfeldt from Opeth with a growl straight out of Hell.Thumbs Up  Modern Metal is not the same without it.  Although not technically growling but more twisted screaming,Devon Townsend and Jons Kidman,"Meshuggah" also are beautiful in their own way.
 
All up though it is horses for courses but Metal has to have growling these days for me.Kinda wimpy if it hasn't and we don't listen to wimpy Metal, Down here LOL
Matt

Back to Top
Floyd919 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 03:21
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

 
 
There are plenty of times I would prefer a violin to cello and vice-versa, piano to a synthesizer........
 

Exactly! That's what I'm saying: sometimes you prefer violin to cello, and sometimes the other way around! It depends on musical context, and your mood etc. But you can't say "violin is superb to cello always" or something like that.
Same with growling. Sometimes it's done so-so, sometimes it doesn't fit, sometimes the context is bad. But sometimes not. One of the best examples is Opeth.

I think one should not try to get into growling vocals itself, but into music where it's suitable. Get into Opeth music. Not the "cookie monster" noise that singer is making. By taking growling out of context you make it sound funny, in context it is beautiful/atmospheric/emotional.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 03:31
 
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:

 I think one should not try to get into growling vocals itself, but into music where it's suitable. Get into Opeth music. Not the "cookie monster" noise that singer is making. By taking growling out of context you make it sound funny, in context it is beautiful/atmospheric/emotional.

I tried to listen to Opeth once. The Baying of the Hounds sounds like Keith Emerson having a bad trip. I'm not sure why people always recommend Opeth to see that growls don't have to be silly, I don't hear much a difference between theirs and most metal. I listen to a lot of music that other people would think is silly, so whatever, I just don't see why Michael always wins the growling vocalists polls, maybe it's because he can also actually sing as well. But even still, Mike Patton is better at that too...
 
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:

 You'd never say that you "hate distorted bass", or that you "prefer violin to cello". Stupid, right? Narrow-minded, right?) So why do you say "I can't take extreme vocals"? That's the same thing... You can't compare them.

Neither of those opinions would be stupid or narrow-minded, and it's not the same thing at all as comparing singing to extreme vocals.

Edited by Henry Plainview - November 29 2010 at 03:35
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Oliverum View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 30 2010
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 06:33
Growls - like or not?

Opeth - yes (occasional, to support the mood of the music)

Devin Townsend  - no (too much, just for the cause of growling)
All the best freaks are here, please stop staring at me. Marillion - Freaks (1988).
Back to Top
Floyd919 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 12:17
Originally posted by Oliverum Oliverum wrote:

Growls - like or not?

Opeth - yes (occasional, to support the mood of the music)

Devin Townsend  - no (too much, just for the cause of growling)

Strongly disagree. Both "yes". And Devin screams most of the time, not growls. His extreme vocals always sound kinda more natural, more melodic than most others'.
Back to Top
Floyd919 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 12:21
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
I tried to listen to Opeth once. The Baying of the Hounds sounds like Keith Emerson having a bad trip. I'm not sure why people always recommend Opeth to see that growls don't have to be silly, I don't hear much a difference between theirs and most metal. I listen to a lot of music that other people would think is silly, so whatever, I just don't see why Michael always wins the growling vocalists polls, maybe it's because he can also actually sing as well. But even still, Mike Patton is better at that too...

You know, after I listened to Opeth "once", I didn't like it at all. Same thing with Genesis, Tool, Cynic, Bjork, Townsend and many others. It takes time to dig into it. I did, and now they are one of my favourite bands. I always recommend not to discard a band after only a few listens.


Edited by Floyd919 - November 29 2010 at 12:22
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 20:18
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
I tried to listen to Opeth once. The Baying of the Hounds sounds like Keith Emerson having a bad trip. I'm not sure why people always recommend Opeth to see that growls don't have to be silly, I don't hear much a difference between theirs and most metal. I listen to a lot of music that other people would think is silly, so whatever, I just don't see why Michael always wins the growling vocalists polls, maybe it's because he can also actually sing as well. But even still, Mike Patton is better at that too...
You know, after I listened to Opeth "once", I didn't like it at all. Same thing with Genesis, Tool, Cynic, Bjork, Townsend and many others. It takes time to dig into it. I did, and now they are one of my favourite bands. I always recommend not to discard a band after only a few listens.
I try to avoid music I don't like. I'm not going to write a bad review for them because that wouldn't be fair, but I'm quite certain nothing is going to make me like Opeth and Tool. Everything they like about music is the opposite of what I like.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17511
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 21:35
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

That's why I said as long as you represent your reasons why you don't like something with respect, there is no problem NOT liking an artist or style of music or whatever.
If someone simply states.."hate it" with no reasons why, then I generally don't pay attention.
 Tell me why you don't like something......then I can understand better without making my own judgements.
 
Absolutely ...
 
I just describe what I see and felt -- and in the case of the King Crimson story ... what I knew and saw at the time when it came out ...
 
I don't tell you to go listen because this lady (or guy) has great gams for you all to shudder over! ... my opinion is that too many of those "reviews" are not reviews at all and should be removed. I have made that suggestion to the admins, but I think that could be one of those issues ... when some of those words taken out would make the board look to imp'ish and close minded ... instead of a board that has everyone's thoughts and opinions. My preference? ... the democratic way ... and there will be garbage ... you have to leave behind. But I'm sure you can see and identify the pearls when you see them!
 
Close your eyes is one secret ... just close your eyes and listen!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Any Colour You Like View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12294
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2010 at 22:06
I honestly have no preference. Indeed, I love both styles, and especially artists who have the depth of vision and voice to attain the benefits of both (see Devin Townsend, Mikael Akerfeldt). It's all just one big aesthetical texture, which is just simply based around the music's purpose. That's all.

Whether it sounds good or not is up to the individual.
Back to Top
pied piper View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2010
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 94
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 04:21
I hate monster growl voices.
So my vote is obvious... even if the best thing, IMHO, is a clean vocal with just a trace of dirty...
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 09:49
Originally posted by Floyd919 Floyd919 wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

 
 
There are plenty of times I would prefer a violin to cello and vice-versa, piano to a synthesizer........
 

Exactly! That's what I'm saying: sometimes you prefer violin to cello, and sometimes the other way around! It depends on musical context, and your mood etc. But you can't say "violin is superb to cello always" or something like that.
Same with growling. Sometimes it's done so-so, sometimes it doesn't fit, sometimes the context is bad. But sometimes not. One of the best examples is Opeth.

I think one should not try to get into growling vocals itself, but into music where it's suitable. Get into Opeth music. Not the "cookie monster" noise that singer is making. By taking growling out of context you make it sound funny, in context it is beautiful/atmospheric/emotional.
 
Floyd919...I can respect your push for death growl vocals and I understand your point above but for me 99.99999% of the time I prefer non-growling death vocals. Just last night I was streaming Opeth Black Water Park.....I can't get passed the vocals to enjoy the metal music....that's where I start to get bored, frustrated and just stop listening.
 
My answer to your point is that I do like violins, cellos.......and but I don't like death growl vocals....so non-death growl vocals for me please Smile.
 
 
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 09:55
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

   I'm not sure why people always recommend Opeth to see that growls don't have to be silly, I don't hear much a difference between theirs and most metal.

Because there are all those mellow parts accompanying the growls which supposedly makes the growls more palatable. Oh, and the lyrics are so "intelligent" unlike typical death metal lyrics, that too.  Opeth is mostly death metal for people who don't like death metal but would still like to listen to it Shocked. Personally, I find growls really incongruous when they crash into a lush, acoustic landscape. At least with really fast music with mostly crushing riffs, one could argue only growls would suit such music. 
Back to Top
FromuzBand View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: November 23 2010
Location: Uzbekistan
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 10:53
I prefer complex vocals, for example Pain of Solvation vocalists Gildenlow
Back to Top
Harry Hood View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1305
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 18:31
Death growls. Every time. Music is only made better by it as far as I'm concerned.

Not just modern prog. Classic prog as well.

"Death growl" can mean a lot of things. There's actually a pretty wide range of things you can do with it musically. While there's the cliche,limited Akerfeldt type growls, there are also more talented and diverse death growlists. It's as valid of a singing style as anything else.

Chuck Schuldiner had a beautiful voice, not despite being death growl, but because of it. 

The death growl spectrum for me also includes some of the older classic prog vocalists. Lots of them have voices that have detriorated into growl teritory, and honestly the music is made better for it. Listen to some later Kansas recordings for some great examples of this.


Steve Walsh's vocals are pretty much in death metal/black metal territory at this point, and it adds to the tension and intensity of the music in a way that benefits it.Honestly I prefer these newer live recordings to their studio counterparts. Fish and Peter Hammill are also great at this.

Clean vocals can go to hell. Give me the raw passion and intensity of a death growl any day of the week.





Back to Top
ferush View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2010 at 19:00
Geddy Lee, Michael Sadler, James LaBrie, John Wetton, Derek W. Dick, Greg Lake, these are the best.
Back to Top
MrEdifus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 23 2008
Location: VA USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1263
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2010 at 15:43
I'm not going to pick one or the other, because I like too many different kinds of music to just pick one. Certain music demands certain vocals, and there are times when either one is appropriate.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 20>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.230 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.