Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - I just got felony arrested, not kidding.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedI just got felony arrested, not kidding.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 11>
Author
Message
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:42
In my mind guns are symptom not a cause. The gun ownership in the rural town I grew up in was likely much higher than most urban areas. Gun violence was extremely low, but lots of kids got killed every year in drunk driving events. Every class had casualties. I know of two shootings in 40 years (one a bar fight and one a labor dispute), and I suspect over half of households had firearms.
 
In urban areas, it's a very different story.
 
I'm not saying guns are good. I think they're terrible and there is no gun in my house. But violence in the U.S. runs much deeper than gun control.


Edited by Negoba - April 29 2010 at 16:43
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Dalezilla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:43
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Dalezilla Dalezilla wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Dalezilla Dalezilla wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

But places in the US have banned guns, only to find that crime increases


I can see that as a short term effect, yes. The outlaws feel more at ease and take advantage of the situation; some citizens feel deprived of their right and hide the guns, tension grows from all sides... But I can see no other solution to the problem. Investing money and trust in people's lives and it will profit... with lives saved. Build more prisons (as you said), finance raids, extreme control, surveillance, etc and don't expect results very soon.



Banning guns doesn't work for the same reason banning alcohol didn't work and banning drugs isn't working.


The only thing common to those three is the fact that they were banned. By your logic,
- anyone who has ever bought an overpriced, illegal bottle of whiskey to satisfy a minor vice would also buy a killing device just because one comes after another (?) Confused
- dumping the ban on heroin would lower the consume Confused
etc


You missed my point. The people who want guns, alcohol, drugs, will get them anyway, whether there is a ban or not. Historically bans have increased the consumption of the banned good.


I didn't miss your point, I put it to test in various situations. It doesn't stand...



I never implied that someone who would buy whisky would also buy guns. What I'm saying is that bans only ban things from people who don't want them anyway. The criminals who want guns will get them regardless of whether there is a ban or not and in fact if there is a ban they'll just get them more easily. Like I said historically bans don't work. Check out the article I posted: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html
Back to Top
Any Colour You Like View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12294
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:43
In NZ there has been a big call for Police to arm themselves in the wake of several officers and civilians being killed by gun related crime. Our Police now have tasers and stab-proof vests, but they are not always worn while on duty. Last year an officer was killed and three others wounded when a man shot them whilst on a routine drug house search. That shoutout occured less than a mile from my house, and scared the crap out of everyone here. I'm not saying that gun control is really a huge issue in NZ, we have farmers with guns, hunters (like me) with guns and that is usually about it. Recently though some gangs have begun to use them as well, and this has caused a reciprocal call for the Police to be armed. Personally, I have no issue with this because I'm a law abiding citizen who won't antagonise the Police nor threaten others with guns.

Everyone in this country has the right to defend themselves, not as explicitly outlined as in the American Constitution; but we seemingly have a flawed system of liberty and justice here. People should have the right to own guns, but only through proper liscensing and education systems, this must be countered by the fact that the Police can arm themselves too. It is absurd that a man can kill an unarmed Policeman with a gun, while the Police must respond with the AOS (Armed Offenders Squad) or in serious cases, the SAS.

(BTW: It is illegal in NZ to own a full auto rifle or handgun without a collector's (C) license, and NZ Police now are issued with an AR-15 in the boot of each squad car in the wake of that shooting I outlined earlier)


Edited by Any Colour You Like - April 29 2010 at 18:09
Back to Top
Dalezilla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:46
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

But places in the US have banned guns, only to find that crime increases


I can see that as a short term effect, yes. The outlaws feel more at ease and take advantage of the situation; some citizens feel deprived of their right and hide the guns, tension grows from all sides... But I can see no other solution to the problem. Investing money and trust in people's lives and it will profit... with lives saved. Build more prisons (as you said), finance raids, extreme control, surveillance, etc and don't expect results very soon.

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

If you are saying that Europe has lower crime without guns, then clearly the guns are not the variable.


Why?



Let me ask this (it's my roundabout way of answering "why"):

What percentage of the homicides in the US are gang-related and/or involving hard drugs?

According to this, 22.4% of federally incarcerated people and 32.6% of state incarcerated people reported to being under the influence of drugs during the time of their offense.

According to this chart, 1.2% of all deaths in the US involve firearms (and this includes gang warfare, self-defensive shootings, and police shooting dangerous criminals).

This article states that in one city, 86% of homicides were gang-related.

In Europe, do countries have a problem with gangs like our large cities do?  What's the situation there?  Question


I don't know about the rest of Europe. (Europe has many countries) And I don't have facts, but I will just say that when I moved to Canada from Finland the whole gang situation was something I had never experienced. This has been something completely new to me. There may be gangs of some sort in Finland too, but not like here. Gangs aren't in the media at all and most people think of them as a problem countries in North America have.
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:51
 
What I think confuses us most about the States goes back to something Epignosis said about why you get shootings in schools but not in police stations.  We don't get these incidents of students shooting up schools or colleges in this country.  Most people can't believe that just one of these incidents doesn't result in at least some strengthenings of gun law.  It seems that anyone with any mental health problems can if not own a gun then pick one up pretty easily without any planning. 
 
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 16:59
Originally posted by Dalezilla Dalezilla wrote:


I never implied that someone who would buy whisky would also buy guns. What I'm saying is that bans only ban things from people who don't want them anyway. The criminals who want guns will get them regardless of whether there is a ban or not and in fact if there is a ban they'll just get them more easily. Like I said historically bans don't work. Check out the article I posted: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html


You didn't imply that yourself, but the logic you employed implies that. By your logic (and I mean that, I'm not just putting words in your mouth), the increase of drug use was because of them being banned. I honestly think that's than oversimplification used for a getting a simple explanation where there's none. History says the drug use grew because they were a main item of the alternative culture of the late 60s and early 70s, because they create addiction and other such "real" not theoretical reasons. Saying that drug use would have been smaller than it is were they not banned is just naivity IMO. Also, guns are banned here and that didn't lead to an increase of gun use. Of course there's a completely different context in the US, what I'm saying is that you can't extrapolate into an universal law because it would have to fit all situations (and it doesn't).
Back to Top
Dalezilla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:01
harmonium.ro, you might want to take a look at this too: http://www.iwmc.org/IWMC-Forum/JamesSwan/060129.htm

"No one, except criminals, wants crime and mayhem. But however well-intentioned anti-gun folks may be, research shows that gun bans are likely to get the opposite results of what they are intended to achieve, because legal gun owners by and large are not criminally inclined. And without self-defense, people become easy prey for human predators."

This study obviously applies more to the States and owning a gun is completely foreign to me and the countries I've lived in. However, bottom line is that banning guns doesn't solve the problems and there are a number of studies that prove it.
Back to Top
Dalezilla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:05
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Dalezilla Dalezilla wrote:


I never implied that someone who would buy whisky would also buy guns. What I'm saying is that bans only ban things from people who don't want them anyway. The criminals who want guns will get them regardless of whether there is a ban or not and in fact if there is a ban they'll just get them more easily. Like I said historically bans don't work. Check out the article I posted: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html


You didn't imply that yourself, but the logic you employed implies that. By your logic (and I mean that, I'm not just putting words in your mouth), the increase of drug use was because of them being banned. I honestly think that's than oversimplification used for a getting a simple explanation where there's none. History says the drug use grew because they were a main item of the alternative culture of the late 60s and early 70s, because they create addiction and other such "real" not theoretical reasons. Saying that drug use would have been smaller than it is were they not banned is just naivity IMO. Also, guns are banned here and that didn't lead to an increase of gun use. Of course there's a completely different context in the US, what I'm saying is that you can't extrapolate into an universal law because it would have to fit all situations (and it doesn't).


All I'm saying is that a number of studies show that the decriminilization of drugs decreseas the use of drugs and that banning guns has the opposite effect of what it is intended to achieve.

And yes there obviously are other factors to be considered, but many studies show what effects bans have. I don't know what the situation in France is, but maybe the ban worked, because there wasn't a problem in the first place? The US has a problem and studies show that bans have not worked there. Therefore, I think they have to find some other solutions.

Did you check the article I posted on drugs? There seems to quite a lot of evidence for drug use decreasing due to decreminilization.


Edited by Dalezilla - April 29 2010 at 17:07
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:25
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

But places in the US have banned guns, only to find that crime increases


I can see that as a short term effect, yes. The outlaws feel more at ease and take advantage of the situation; some citizens feel deprived of their right and hide the guns, tension grows from all sides... But I can see no other solution to the problem. Investing money and trust in people's lives and it will profit... with lives saved. Build more prisons (as you said), finance raids, extreme control, surveillance, etc and don't expect results very soon.

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

If you are saying that Europe has lower crime without guns, then clearly the guns are not the variable.


Why?



Let me ask this (it's my roundabout way of answering "why"):

What percentage of the homicides in the US are gang-related and/or involving hard drugs?

According to this, 22.4% of federally incarcerated people and 32.6% of state incarcerated people reported to being under the influence of drugs during the time of their offense.

According to this chart, 1.2% of all deaths in the US involve firearms (and this includes gang warfare, self-defensive shootings, and police shooting dangerous criminals).

This article states that in one city, 86% of homicides were gang-related.

In Europe, do countries have a problem with gangs like our large cities do?  What's the situation there?  Question


Those are good and useful points. I don't know much about the situation in Europe (and I think there aren't over-all statistics). As an overview, what I can say is that:
- there are huge issues with ghetto/gang criminality in France, especially at the North of Paris and in the South of the country, where most of the African and Arab African immigration is located. The 2005 riots I mentioned are very similar to the famous 1992 Los Angeles riots, the ugliest American riots I have heard about, from the period with the worst crime rate ever in the history of the US. The damage done was worth four times greater in the US than in France, but the number of deaths was 22.5 times greater in the US than in France. I think that speaks volumes.
- I don't recall any of the British riots Wikipedia mentions, but it seems like there were some.
- there is a quite violent Muslim community in the Netherlands, whose most atrocious act was cutting the throat of Theo van Gogh on the street. He was the last descendant of Vincent van Gogh and had recently made a documentary showing how are women treated in the Dutch Muslim community.
- there are bloody problems in Germany between the immigrant Turkish and Kurd communities (a dispute with a historical tradition) and between the Neo Nazi gangs and those two communities but also against other immigrants as well (a few years ago this was accelerated by the leader of the Conservatives who run for PM office with the slogan "Foreigners, out!" This reminds me that the 80s and 90s were a good time for Neo-Nazis in England... How is that as of late?
- in Italy there is the older problem of the Mafia, and in recent years there is also the major problem of gypsy immigrants (mostly coming from Romania Ouch). Their acts of violence and crime started a chain of response violence, including burning of immigrant villages and blood shedding.
- even in the peaceful Romania there are violent gangs in two of the major cities, armed with ninja swords... They came close to fighting a few times but they typically chickened out when facing each other LOL Last year there was another case with a huge public audience, when a leading public figure sent his bodyguards to solve a gang issue... which they did by shooting a guy in the leg with a compressed air gun. LOL The real problems in Romania are in villages with both gypsy and non-gypsy villagers... There were a few conflicts, the bloodiest was when a house was burnt with its owners inside.

That's basically what I know. So the phenomenon is here too, but doesn't have a homogenous coverage (never heard of anything like that in the Scandinavian countries indeed).
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:32
Originally posted by Dalezilla Dalezilla wrote:

harmonium.ro, you might want to take a look at this too: http://www.iwmc.org/IWMC-Forum/JamesSwan/060129.htm

"No one, except criminals, wants crime and mayhem. But however well-intentioned anti-gun folks may be, research shows that gun bans are likely to get the opposite results of what they are intended to achieve, because legal gun owners by and large are not criminally inclined. And without self-defense, people become easy prey for human predators."

This study obviously applies more to the States and owning a gun is completely foreign to me and the countries I've lived in. However, bottom line is that banning guns doesn't solve the problems and there are a number of studies that prove it.


I agree with this, and I addressed it in a post:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

But places in the US have banned guns, only to find that crime increases


I can see that as a short term effect, yes. The outlaws feel more at ease and take advantage of the situation; some citizens feel deprived of their right and hide the guns, tension grows from all sides... But I can see no other solution to the problem. Investing money and trust in people's lives and it will profit... with lives saved. Build more prisons (as you said), finance raids, extreme control, surveillance, etc and don't expect results very soon.


Smile
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:37
The problem is, this sort of crap happens here in the U.S., and it comes to seem reasonable to own a gun. 
 
 
This seems to happen about once a week in my neck of the woods.


Edited by jammun - April 29 2010 at 17:39
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 17:59
I can't believe that someone is actually proclaiming banning guns as a good idea. Thats absolutely retarded as we don't live in a fascist country.  
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:00
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

The problem is, this sort of crap happens here in the U.S., and it comes to seem reasonable to own a gun. 
 
 
This seems to happen about once a week in my neck of the woods.


Yep, getting more common every day. 

I agree with one of the commenters at the end...."hope they catch these animals and hang them."  Of course that won't happen.  We'll give them training and therapy instead. 
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:03
Originally posted by himtroy himtroy wrote:

I can't believe that someone is actually proclaiming banning guns as a good idea. Thats absolutely retarded as we don't live in a fascist country.  


Yours is the only out of place post, actually. Thumbs Down
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:07
Originally posted by himtroy himtroy wrote:

I can't believe that someone is actually proclaiming banning guns as a good idea. Thats absolutely retarded as we don't live in a fascist country.  


I agree.

Sorry for the lack of cultural sensitivity, but I'd rather not feel neutered.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:15
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

But places in the US have banned guns, only to find that crime increases


I can see that as a short term effect, yes. The outlaws feel more at ease and take advantage of the situation; some citizens feel deprived of their right and hide the guns, tension grows from all sides... But I can see no other solution to the problem. Investing money and trust in people's lives and it will profit... with lives saved. Build more prisons (as you said), finance raids, extreme control, surveillance, etc and don't expect results very soon.

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

If you are saying that Europe has lower crime without guns, then clearly the guns are not the variable.


Why?



Let me ask this (it's my roundabout way of answering "why"):

What percentage of the homicides in the US are gang-related and/or involving hard drugs?

According to this, 22.4% of federally incarcerated people and 32.6% of state incarcerated people reported to being under the influence of drugs during the time of their offense.

According to this chart, 1.2% of all deaths in the US involve firearms (and this includes gang warfare, self-defensive shootings, and police shooting dangerous criminals).

This article states that in one city, 86% of homicides were gang-related.

In Europe, do countries have a problem with gangs like our large cities do?  What's the situation there?  Question
According to that chart the total number of deaths by firearms in the USA in 2002 was 28,663
 
If 86% of those were gang-related that means 14% were not gang-related ... or 4,013 deaths
 
According to this article the total number of deaths by firearms in the UK in 2009 was 42 (and cites many of those as being gang-related)
 
... which works out as something in the order of 0.0068% of all deaths in the UK being gun-related.
... or almost 20 times fewer than the non gang-related US firearm deaths when normalised for population size.
... or 136 times fewer than all US firearm deaths when normalised for population size.
 
 
What?
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:26
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by himtroy himtroy wrote:

I can't believe that someone is actually proclaiming banning guns as a good idea. Thats absolutely retarded as we don't live in a fascist country.  


Yours is the only out of place post, actually. Thumbs Down

Not really, you've been criticized by the majority, I have the way our countries are on my side, and I have the constitution.  I'm not into guns or violence in the least bit, but invading our lives and saying what we can and can't own is the opposite of helping.  You  put way too much trust in other people and your government if you think society can give up guns.  How are we going to defend ourselves when we get attacked?  Or when our government gets out of line?  

Try telling smaller people, like women who live in bad areas,  that they shouldn't be able to have guns, they should be able to defend themselves against men over three times their weight who have weapons (oh yeah theres no guns, well I'm sure they can threaten and kill people with something else)


Edited by himtroy - April 29 2010 at 18:26
Back to Top
WalterDigsTunes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:31
Originally posted by himtroy himtroy wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by himtroy himtroy wrote:

I can't believe that someone is actually proclaiming banning guns as a good idea. Thats absolutely retarded as we don't live in a fascist country.  


Yours is the only out of place post, actually. Thumbs Down

Not really, you've been criticized by the majority, I have the way our countries are on my side, and I have the constitution.  I'm not into guns or violence in the least bit, but invading our lives and saying what we can and can't own is the opposite of helping.  You  put way too much trust in other people and your government if you think society can give up guns.  How are we going to defend ourselves when we get attacked?  Or when our government gets out of line?  

Try telling smaller people, like women who live in bad areas,  that they shouldn't be able to have guns, they should be able to defend themselves against men over three times their weight who have weapons (oh yeah theres no guns, well I'm sure they can threaten and kill people with something else)


Pepper spray? Knives? Self-defense classes? You know, things for personal protection rather than lobbing ammunition?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:33
^^ I am talking to presumably reasonable people, willing to take some time off their daily routine and discuss various issue just for the sake/fun of it.  That's probably not the case for you. This is a discussion where people have exchanged only arguments before you joined. And speaking of "retarded", the only thing said here that would bring that in mind would be
- calling various civilized countries fascist because they ban guns
- calling the polite expression of opinion on a public discussion forum "invading one's life". If you can't stand the expression of opinions different to yours, please stay away of public forums.
Cheers.


Edited by harmonium.ro - April 29 2010 at 18:34
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2010 at 18:34
Okay, firstly I was joking.  I was saying that the criminals are going to find other weapons and....guns.  Just because they're not sold in stores it doesn't mean criminals won't have them. They're still going to be much more dangerous than the innocent person they're preying on, in fact even more so now that they know that person doesn't have a gun.  I don't see myself ever owning a gun, but if more good people had guns criminals would be much more wary of who they attacked.

EDIT:   That was a response to Walter


Edited by himtroy - April 29 2010 at 18:37
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.