Least Proggy Metallica Album |
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Author | |||||
poslednijat_colobar
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 31 2008 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline Points: 394 |
Posted: November 25 2008 at 05:21 | ||||
Load is everything else,but prog rock!
|
|||||
trackstoni
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 23 2008 Location: Lebanon Status: Offline Points: 934 |
Posted: November 25 2008 at 12:02 | ||||
None of these albums are progressive , except for the first 4 albums . Heavy Metal Rock by all means , with
SOME inclination to Progressive in some Songs , specially for the Black Album and Master of Puppets , and maybe Ride the Lightning ////// |
|||||
Tracking Tracks of Rock
|
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 26 2008 at 15:17 | ||||
No, there's lots of actual Progessive Rock on the first 4 albums.
It's Progressive METAL - how hard is that to understand?
There's almost nothing progressive on the Black Album - just ballads, Nu-Metal and some thrash. The Black Album just sounds better than previous albums because of Bob Rock's shiny metallic production. The songs are much less progressive as a rule than Kill 'Em All.
Ride the Lightning is probably the first Progessive Metal album proper, with MoP being the absolute benchmark and pinnacle of Progressive Metal composition - but KEA has moments of PROG, a la King Crimson. Edited by Certif1ed - November 26 2008 at 15:21 |
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 09 2008 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 24598 |
Posted: November 26 2008 at 15:24 | ||||
If you mean that Kill 'Em All is progressive in the sense that it far exceeded anything that was heard in metal at the time, then yes, you're right. Otherwise I agree with you 100%. Also, I'd like to thank the person who resurrected this thread. It gave me a few laughs going back and reading some of the things some people had posted. Edited by birdwithteeth11 - November 26 2008 at 15:26 |
|||||
|
|||||
obiter
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 05 2006 Location: Donaghadee Status: Offline Points: 116 |
Posted: November 26 2008 at 22:23 | ||||
So is any band that does anything new or different progressive?
I suppose Norwegian Death Metal also progressed Metal but does that make it "progressive". If so, then Kill Em All and Master of Puppets qualify. oh whoops my head just disappeared up my own backside. i never knew my navel looked like that (from the inside). There's a voice in my head saying "just vote and run away": OK I voted: I don't reckon any are progressive |
|||||
An té nach mbíonn láidir ní folláir dó bheith glic
|
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 00:22 | ||||
seems like this band, above any other, needs to be eliminated from this website
sticks out like a sore thumb, why not add all metal bands then, or every single rock band for that matter
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 05 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2614 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 00:31 | ||||
St. Anger is the least proggy. They tried hard to ditch their influences with that one. Bad riffs, and uninteresting song structures. Their lyrics focused much more on personal problems than outside political/societal issues. Although to be fair, that is where they were at the time, and needed to get through.
|
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 03:29 | ||||
Not necessarily.
I think there are plenty of Death Metal bands here - Death, for example.
The reasoning that if a subgenre of Metal progressed the Metal genre, then that subgenre is progressive is fatally flawed: Progressive music is easily identifiable in that it is inherently progressive. How that identification is made is much trickier, and is usually decided on a per-band basis, not a per subgenre basis.
Kill 'Em All "qualifies" for many, many reasons.
Master of Puppets is a Bona Fide Prog metal album, superior in many ways to Prog metal albums that followed it - most importantly in that it is one of the very few Progressive Metal albums that actually contains complex compositions instead of mere complicated ones.
Not only are both distinctly (one might say completely) different to everything that preceeded them in a very large number of ways, they also contain plainly identifiable elements of Progressive Rock music, including what is, to me, the most important feature - that the music itself is inherently Progressive, not a simple literal progression from what went before - although there is a case for MoP being a simple progression of RtL.
That's quite a feat
The evidence says otherwise
Apart from the fact that this is almost completely incoherent - assuming you're a native English speaker (if not, I apologise) - your reasoning here is non-existent and plain rude to all the people who think that Metallica should be here.
The reason that not all metal bands are added is because not all metal bands are progressive. Metallica WERE, just like Genesis WERE. Edited by Certif1ed - November 27 2008 at 03:34 |
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 24 2007 Location: Ukraine Status: Offline Points: 25210 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 03:45 | ||||
I am safe to assume you guys need to be directed to some background reading? i.e previous threads on the matter |
|||||
|
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:14 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:19 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:28 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 18:30 | ||||
The prog metal category has to be cut up into 7 different descriptions and my ears have me placing more importance in the word metal than prog for any of the bands within that i've heard, and basically all I've said there is that I don't care for metal even if its labelled "prog" but that's my problem. That doesn't now mean that I believe former metal gods Metallica should be included on this site based on a few complex songs and the fact someone claims them as an influence. If there was a Prog Influences category then fine but hypothetically say the Dixie Dregs were influenced by, say, the Allman Brothers Band and say that said Allman Brothers had a few somewhat complex songs of there own then maybe.....see where we are here. Now I like the Allman Brothers but I don't want them thrown in here just so that I can review their work.
Edited by manofmystery - November 27 2008 at 18:31 |
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 08:32 | ||||
They're not here "based on a few complex songs" - please review all of the reasoning rather than making such a snap assumption.
|
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 09:06 | ||||
Bands cannot be removed once added to the site. Sorry about that, but this is what the OWNER of PA wishes. I'm afraid that people who don't agree with this policy will just have to accept it, or find another place to hang out at. |
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 10:28 | ||||
Going by what progrocker said here:
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
WinterLight
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 09 2008 Status: Offline Points: 424 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 10:51 | ||||
Not exactly.
My emphasis added in both quotations. I don't think any commentary on the discrepancy is necessary. Edited by WinterLight - November 28 2008 at 15:47 |
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 15:12 | ||||
And if we are going to include all complex albums with long tracks we could put a lot of bands that aren't prog here. Frankly, I think that Metallica can only be justified as being here if there was an Influences category otherwise it's a little like the rock and roll hall of fame letting Madonna in, she was popular and influenced a generation of pop princesses but is that what rock is all about. Metallica is the band that turned down a bassist because he played too well for god's sake. Oh well, gotta run now and put on an album from my favorite grammy award winning metal band, Jethro Tull.
I do say, I enjoy this healthy debate and respect very much everyones passion and civility. Tell me this isn't fun.
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 09:57 | ||||
You're overlooking the fact that complexity and long tracks are not the only criteria for adding a band.
Metallica is also the band that took on a bassist because he was the best experimental metal bassist on the scene.
They are in Prog-Related, but it's self-evident that the music is Prog, not standard (or even simply elongated) metal.
|
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
DatM
Forum Groupie Joined: November 19 2008 Location: Berlin, Germany Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 11:39 | ||||
Metallica is kinda like pot...for many they were the gateway to harder dru...I mean, music...
Actually I think many thrash and metal bands showed prog leanings back then, which made a lot of metalheads like me check out Rush and other prog bands. This is why DT made such an impact when they came out. |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |