Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Who's the brain behind The Beatles?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWho's the brain behind The Beatles?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>
Poll Question: Who is the mastermind?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
18 [26.87%]
6 [8.96%]
7 [10.45%]
22 [32.84%]
14 [20.90%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2009 at 09:15
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

ShockedShocked
Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

Macca is the brain, and more evident after the death of Epstein.
 
BTW Sacred 22 i have read the Estulin interview, i do not believe anything about that he's saying about the Beatles.
 
And i think that Adorno have no time to "compose" the music of the Beatles between 1967-69, becuase he was doing other things, like writing his Aestetic Teory for example. 
 
Of course, I would be concerned if the majority of people could see thru it. That would just be kookie. Wink  What would the point be?????
It's like what Hitler said, he said, "if you are going to sell a lie make sure it's a big one otherwise no one will believe it"Shocked
 
I imagine Adorno in the studio chat session with the Beatles telling how's Get Back might have sound.LOLLOLLOLWink




Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2009 at 13:58
Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

 
 I imagine Adorno in the studio chat session with the Beatles telling how's Get Back might have sound.LOLLOLLOLWink
 
No, Adorno and anyone else connected with the actual song composition would have them passed down through the proper channels. Then the band would be instructed as to where to go from there.
It is not uncommon to have ghost writers in music and literature and have someone elses name attached to it. Happens all the time.
The band went from a simple rockin blues band to writing very slick and polished tunes out of no where. Anytime anything is mass peddled I tend to take it all with a grain of salt.
Back to Top
mr.cub View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 00:08
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

 
 I imagine Adorno in the studio chat session with the Beatles telling how's Get Back might have sound.LOLLOLLOLWink
 
No, Adorno and anyone else connected with the actual song composition would have them passed down through the proper channels. Then the band would be instructed as to where to go from there.
It is not uncommon to have ghost writers in music and literature and have someone elses name attached to it. Happens all the time.
The band went from a simple rockin blues band to writing very slick and polished tunes out of no where. Anytime anything is mass peddled I tend to take it all with a grain of salt.
Considering how high the Beatles were at the time, I believe if they were covering something up they wouldn't have had the sense not to spill it. One way or another they would have said something.
 
And you obviously haven't heard the evolution from Help to Rubber Soul to Revolver. That is certainly not out of nowhere. They were great writers and solid musicians; people still listen to their music for that reason. If they are conning us, then I'd gladly follow and worship them obediently
Back to Top
mrcozdude View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 00:09
You should of put a yoko option up Big smile
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 02:09
Originally posted by mr.cub mr.cub wrote:

Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

 
 I imagine Adorno in the studio chat session with the Beatles telling how's Get Back might have sound.LOLLOLLOLWink
 
No, Adorno and anyone else connected with the actual song composition would have them passed down through the proper channels. Then the band would be instructed as to where to go from there.
It is not uncommon to have ghost writers in music and literature and have someone elses name attached to it. Happens all the time.
The band went from a simple rockin blues band to writing very slick and polished tunes out of no where. Anytime anything is mass peddled I tend to take it all with a grain of salt.
Considering how high the Beatles were at the time, I believe if they were covering something up they wouldn't have had the sense not to spill it. One way or another they would have said something.
 
And you obviously haven't heard the evolution from Help to Rubber Soul to Revolver. That is certainly not out of nowhere. They were great writers and solid musicians; people still listen to their music for that reason. If they are conning us, then I'd gladly follow and worship them obediently
 
It's not to take anything away from the music, no, some of it is very good, but I'm not convinced they wrote it, that's all. As far as not talking, well money goes a long way in keeping a person quiet, among other things. Gag orders are issued to military personal and others in positions close to so called sensitive information all the time. I know an individual who has a gag order placed on him and he has to inform the authorities of any change of address etc, etc. I even suspect that Lennon may have been killed for that very reason. If Lennon spilled the beans on that one, the world would have listened. Anyway, who knows, it's all possible. Lets put it this way, the Beatles had an awful lot to say about shaping the culture of youth. They really got the ball rolling so to speak.
Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 06:14
This threa(t/d) is obviously in the wrong forum. It should be in the "Just for Fun" forum.
 
The Ruthless have returned from outer space.
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 21:23
[QUOTE=Equality 7-2521] [QUOTE=Sacred 22]
None of the above listed. Theodor W. Adorno was the brains behind the 'Beatles' as he held the rights to the music and eventually his estate sold those rights to Michael Jackson.
 
Adorno a classical musician wrote their music and it was all filtered down through Paul who could not read a note of music by the way. In fact the only half way real musician in the band was George Harrison. John was a poet who could strum a few chords and Ringo a hack drummer at best. George often wondered why they never wanted to use his songs. Oh and as an aside, Paul ended up being Knighted, and you don't get Knighted unless you have done as you were told and made your masters proud.

The Beatles were introduced to the public as a means to spread youth culture which led to the spreading of the 'New Age' culture and this was all geared to setting up a nylistic culture that is all to present today. It's called divide and conquer but this gets into a whole different 'Pandora's Box' if you will. Things are not what they seem

This is probably the wrong thread to discuss this, as I have gone outside the topic many times myself. I love the Beatles no doubt. But I feel compelled to support some of your viewpoints due to all the horrifying crime that I witnessed during my extended time in the music biz. When music changed in the media, I was always there hands on watching agents, managers, and record executives forcing or blackballing anyone that stood in the way of that change.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 21:53
an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml



Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 22:23
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml



I'll be reading that one when I have some time to digest.  In the meantime, everybody let's enjoy the 'reciprocal oral sex' yearning of Please Please Me:
 
C'mon c'mon c'mon c'mon c'mon, c'mon c'mon c'mon
Please please me, oh yeah, like I please you...
 
Damn box set.
 
 
 
 
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2009 at 23:39
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

This is probably the wrong thread to discuss this, as I have gone outside the topic many times myself. I love the Beatles no doubt. But I feel compelled to support some of your viewpoints due to all the horrifying crime that I witnessed during my extended time in the music biz. When music changed in the media, I was always there hands on watching agents, managers, and record executives forcing or blackballing anyone that stood in the way of that change.
 
I have seen it first hand as well. Few people really understand how the business works. You have seen it and you know. Once you get into the business you find out and Frank Zappa was very vocal about that. Steven Wilson as of late is another one.
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 03:08
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml

 
Interesting article and it really supports what I have been saying. Thanks for digging that one up.
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 03:20
Now that I think of it, Plato said in the 'Republic' that he thought musicians should be licenced for the tremendous power that they can weild upon the unsuspecting public, and when you look at what those master musicians (Beatles) who could not even read music did, well it really should have any intellegent person thinking. Culture creation? hmmmmmmmmmm
 
"All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players"
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 03:49
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml

 
Interesting article and it really supports what I have been saying. Thanks for digging that one up.


of course it supports what you've been saying, don't most things?  Surely the substandard quality of the Beatles' solo work was due to Adorno's absence.  And George Harrison was attacked in his home by a crazed fan to silence him.  Wait, I can see it;  one day in early 1966 Paul McCartney quietly meets with one 'Mr. A' who promptly says, "I like you boys but listen to this", at which point he plays a demo version of Eleanor Rigby, after which Paul says "Yeah mate, you've really got somethin there".



 


Edited by Atavachron - September 11 2009 at 03:51
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 05:04
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml

 
Interesting article and it really supports what I have been saying. Thanks for digging that one up.


of course it supports what you've been saying, don't most things?  Surely the substandard quality of the Beatles' solo work was due to Adorno's absence.  And George Harrison was attacked in his home by a crazed fan to silence him.  Wait, I can see it;  one day in early 1966 Paul McCartney quietly meets with one 'Mr. A' who promptly says, "I like you boys but listen to this", at which point he plays a demo version of Eleanor Rigby, after which Paul says "Yeah mate, you've really got somethin there".
This is veering off into von Däniken territory and follows a similar logic to his arrogant theories that ancient civilisations were too primitive to have built the pyramids so they must have had alien help.
 
There are too many assumptions being made about the musical abilities of the Beatles and all this musicologist analysis is retrospective. It is already been asserted that the Beatles played "by ear", so it is only natural that they composed "by ear" - and in doing that they would not have followed any rules of chord progressions, blues or otherwise, since their musical education was practical rather than theoretical and from a broader palate (and palette Wink) than just blues based rock'n'roll.
 
For example their use of the plagel cadence shows that hymns figured somewhere in that education, which is not unsurprising given the School Education system in 1950s Liverpool being considerably less secular than we know it today; also McCartney's family were Jazz and Brass Band musicians, he was exposed to all kinds of music and would have called on that when writing his own music.
 
Of course they would have started from a framework of 'standard' chord progressions learnt from hit tunes of the day without realising that they were "rules", but then modified that with accidental note, chord and key changes that simply sounded right to them, regardless of how right those new progressions where to trained musicologists. These things don't have to be planned or orchestrated, they just happen, and thousands of other bands make similar 'mistakes', just none of them hit upon a winning formula quite like the Beatles did. Wacky (or clever) key changes could be similar 'errors'  - in retrospect they look complex, but they could just as easily be "compose by ear" changes that sounded right to them - I doubt that they knew they were modulating from "the home key of G Major onto an unstable B minor." - the chord just fitted for them at that time so they used it.
 
Another point made in the text is that some of the chord progressions don't stand up without the overlying vocal harmony - which they make out is some wonderfully clever invention - it's not - it's a natural result of composing on the guitar/piano while singing along - both the melody and the chord progression were composed simultaneously, that's all.


Edited by Dean - September 12 2009 at 16:56
What?
Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 06:16
It gives new meaning to the Fab 4...
 
The Fabricated 4LOL
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 06:26
^ I think you're confusing them with the pre-fab four:
Wink
What?
Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 06:54
^the Prefabricated FourWink
Back to Top
camilleanne View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 29 2009
Location: Philippines
Status: Offline
Points: 403
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 07:58
I think its JohnLennon
The planet is fine the people are f**ked.
-George Carlin-
Back to Top
ModernRocker79 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 62
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 08:00

 There are so many things the Beatles did musically that jazz musicians were not EVEN DOING at the time. The psychedelic sounding pre-recorded loops, on "Tomorrow Never Knows", the backward guitar parts on "I'm Only Sleeping, George Harrison was working at a sophisticated level of extrapolating Indian scales to the Western setting, something no one else had done in rock music at the time. "Love You To", which is certainly derived from classical Indian. The guitar feedback on "I Feel Fine", the 12 string jangle sound that influenced Roger McGuinn, the reason why the Byrds went electric was because of the Beatles, the ska rhythm on "I Call Your Name", the layered fuzz bass and bass at the fore-front on "Think for Yourself". They basically influenced every early progressive rock artist and probably invented Avant-Pop on Revolver and Psychedelic Pop for that matter on Rubber Soul. "Tomorrow Never Knows” which is proto so many things is maybe the first example of Psychedelic electronic which in turns has so many spin-offs in today's music. Then there is Sgt Pepper look at the album structure and tell me it was innovative at the time. The "overture" and "reprise" at the end, and A Day in the Life, with its use of orchestra, unusual structure, time changes, sound effects and sometimes complete disregard for pop music conventions--all share a lot in common with prog music. Even Robert Fripp got into rock music after hearing "A Day in the Life".



Edited by ModernRocker79 - September 11 2009 at 08:02
Back to Top
SgtPepper67 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2009 at 20:13
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

an excellent article on how and why the Beatles music, particularly the early work, was so notable for the time, it even mentions Adorno right at about halfway down the page -
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME03/Words_and_chords.shtml

 
Interesting article and it really supports what I have been saying. Thanks for digging that one up.


of course it supports what you've been saying, don't most things?  Surely the substandard quality of the Beatles' solo work was due to Adorno's absence.  And George Harrison was attacked in his home by a crazed fan to silence him.  Wait, I can see it;  one day in early 1966 Paul McCartney quietly meets with one 'Mr. A' who promptly says, "I like you boys but listen to this", at which point he plays a demo version of Eleanor Rigby, after which Paul says "Yeah mate, you've really got somethin there".
This is veering off into von Däniken territory and follows a similar logic to his arrogant theories that ancient civilisations were too primitive to have built the pyramids so they must have had alien help.
 
There are too many assumptions being made about the musical abilities of the Beatles and all this musicologist analysis is retrospective. It is already been asserted that the Beatles played "by ear", so it is only natural that they composed "by ear" - and in doing that they would not have followed any rules of chord progressions, blues or otherwise, since their musical education was practical rather than theoretical and from a broader palate (and palette Wink) than just blues based rock'n'roll.
 
For example their use of the plagel cadence shows that hymns figured somewhere in that education, which is not unsurprising given the School Education system in 1950s Liverpool being considerably less secular than we know it today; also McCartney's family were Jazz and Brass Band musicians, he was exposed to all kinds of music and would have called on that when writing his own music.
 
Of course they would have started from a framework of 'standard' chord progressions learnt from hit tunes of the day without realising that they where "rules", but then modified that with accidental note, chord and key changes that simply sounded right to them, regardless of how right those new progressions where to trained musicologists. These things don't have to be planned or orchestrated, they just happen, and thousands of other bands make similar 'mistakes', just none of them hit upon a winning formula quite like the Beatles did. Wacky (or clever) key changes could be similar 'errors'  - in retrospect they look complex, but they could just as easily be "compose by ear" changes that sounded right to them - I doubt that they knew they were modulating from "the home key of G Major onto an unstable B minor." - the chord just fitted for them at that time so they used it.
 
Another point made in the text is that some of the chord progressions don't stand up without the overlying vocal harmony - which they make out is some wonderfully clever invention - it's not - it's a natural result of composing on the guitar/piano while singing along - both the melody and the chord progression were composed simultaneously, that's all.


That's a perfect explanation. It's so easy to understand, I don't understand why some people need to believe they had some classical musician that wrote their music, how stupid that sounds? well, they had George Martin, that's all the help they needed.

In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.