Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
Duplicated entries |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 3637383940 51> |
| Author | |
NotAProghead 
Special Collaborator 
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: May 31 2016 at 11:36 |
|
^ It seems it's worth to ask another admin.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
 |
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member 
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 31 2016 at 12:48 |
|
^ And who can that be ? Keishiro ?
I wonder if Andy wouldn't think of doing it in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 31 2016 at 13:50 |
|
^ Find yourself a rainbow
 . By trial and error method you'll find "your" admin.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 17 2016 at 03:25 |
|
This
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41447 appears to be just a reissue of this http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=5351 The more recent has only 1 review (exactly duplicated from the one on the other album) so it's easy to get rid of it right away...I'll just wait to your approval and then forward it to Admins |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 17 2016 at 07:57 |
|
^ José, I think you're right.
By the way, it looks more like a compilation than a studio album. I'm not a Zappa specialist though.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 17 2016 at 12:56 |
|
^ I've just updated info (on the one to keep) and among several "compiled" tracks there are a couple of unreleased ones which may justify the classification as Studio, take a look if you wish and tell me your opinion.
I'll contact the sole reviewer, then, to get his permission. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 17 2016 at 13:47 |
|
^ José, both reviews are identical so I think the "sole reviewer's" permission is not necessary.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 17 2016 at 15:08 |
|
^ I noticed that, just a matter of courtesy, you see - people can be so itchy around here.
But I value your experience and take it into account on future issues. This time since I asked I'll have to wait out of respect for our pal reviewer. |
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 27 2016 at 05:09 |
|
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=19806
One of those peculiar cases ... I need some help Wouldn't say it's a duplicate but seems to me to be ill classified as compilation Original album here (read my note under releases details) http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=1749 Thanks |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 27 2016 at 16:36 |
|
^ Some Google search:
"In February 2008, it was announced on Big Big Train's BlogSpot that English Boy Wonders was going to be re-recorded and partially re-mixed" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Boy_Wonders) "This is the 2008 'director's-cut' re-issue of English Boy Wonders. The album was originally released in 1997 in an incomplete state as the band ran out of money to finish the recordings. For the 2008 re-issue, the album was properly completed, much of the music was re-recorded and the CD was entirely remixed from the master tapes." (https://bigbigtrain.bandcamp.com/album/english-boy-wonders-2008-re-issue). Looks like 2008 remake is OK in Compilations. It's quite different record. I think no need to combine these 2 entries in one. Track list of 2008 edition on original album page is not necessary in my opinion, I propose to delete it. I would only mention in "Releases info" that in 2008 the album was remixed, partly re-recorded and issued on CD.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 27 2016 at 17:23 |
|
^ OK, don't want to be a boring ass but from the top of my head I remember a similar situation with Banco that got resolved differently
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=32884 Only raise the question for the sake of consistency (I'm a slow learner, I know, bear with me Eugene) |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 27 2016 at 18:24 |
|
^ José, in case of Banco I see no contradiction - in 1991 they completely re-recorded their debut album (and, by the way, "Darwin!" too). These re-recorded versions are not mixes of old and new performances so they are in Studio albums.
1991 versions of "BMS" and "Darwin!" were released separately while 2CD set Some other examples of such "strange" studio albums in PA database: |
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 28 2016 at 11:50 |
|
Thanks, mate !
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 01 2016 at 16:33 |
|
This one (filed as compilation)
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=5503 Is referenced all around as the American version of this one (filed as studio) http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=5504 In fact they share a total of 8 tracks, and each has its own additional 4 different tracks. Check here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magnificent_Moodies https://www.discogs.com/The-Moody-Blues-Go-Now-Moody-Blues-1/master/697476 It's not a full duplication, alright, but even so considered it couldn't be deleted on account of reviews. Do you think any correction is needed here ? Edited by Quinino - July 01 2016 at 17:01 |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 01 2016 at 17:12 |
|
^ I think the only helpful corrections would be to point out that "Go Now" is a US version of "The Magnificent Moodies" and add some reissues info to both albums.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 01 2016 at 17:59 |
|
^ And keep it in compilations ?
 (and the other one in studio...) |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 01 2016 at 18:34 |
|
^ Hm, like the Beatles early US albums (but they had different track lists).
 Maybe ask XOver team's opinion.
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 02 2016 at 05:30 |
Like these two  (..."In fact they share a total of 8 tracks, and each has its own additional 4 different tracks."...)
Edited by Quinino - July 02 2016 at 05:33 |
|
|
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 02 2016 at 08:37 |
|
^ Sorry, I've missed this point.
If so let's leave US edition in Compilations. It will be a kind of "Meet the Moodies".
|
|
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
|
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 02 2016 at 08:45 |
|
OK, I'll update and cross-reference the two
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 3637383940 51> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
NotAProghead wrote: