Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: December 28 2010 at 05:05 |
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes... I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground. But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
|
rdtprog
Special Collaborator
Heavy, RPI, Symph, JR/F Canterbury Teams
Joined: April 04 2009
Location: Mtl, QC
Status: Offline
Points: 5328
|
Posted: December 28 2010 at 06:34 |
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
Anglagard have been original in their way of taking the influence of the 70's band to create their own sound. And their sound is not the same as any specific bands. The choice of using the same instruments of the 70's bands just give to their music a beautiful sound that is still enjoyable 40 years later.
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: December 28 2010 at 06:37 |
Even if Anglagard were heavily inspired by past's greatest, I would NEVER mistake their sound if I heard the a bit of their music without being told who's playing. It's unique.
|
|
CCVP
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
|
Posted: December 28 2010 at 08:04 |
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13738
|
Posted: December 28 2010 at 11:26 |
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
In a recent thread, I made a New Year's Resolution to completely ignore the crap Walter comes out with. Maybe all of us should do the same I am really looking forward to the new album.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28633
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 03:24 |
lazland wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
In a recent thread, I made a New Year's Resolution to completely ignore the crap Walter comes out with. Maybe all of us should do the same
I am really looking forward to the new album.
|
best policy is to ignore him otherwise the thread becomes about him which is obviously what he wants
|
|
SMSM
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 212
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 16:59 |
Re, best policy is to ignore him otherwise the thread becomes about him which is obviously what he wants
- good advice, and also applicable to apply to a number of those who state opinions on other websites as well, especially the arrogant indignant ones who can't take opinions they don't agree with.
Hopefully, given the legendary cult status of Anglagard will result in them signing with a label with half decent distribution (no major label that would try and make them radio friendly), and result in their previous recordings being made available again in reasonable numbers
|
|
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:15 |
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Bravo! Reason prevails against the defenders of post-89 thieves.
|
|
Anthony H.
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 11 2010
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 6088
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:36 |
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Many people don't realize this about Roine. I think that he is one of the greatest composers and guitarists ever. But hater's certainly are gonna hate (I don't understand why).
|
|
|
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4521
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:41 |
Still curious about the "89" Walter dogma. Is it because you still want to include a certain 89 album that you like or is it just a random thing that sounds cool to you but that is totally ridiculous for anyone else?
Edited by Bonnek - December 29 2010 at 17:42
|
|
CCVP
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 19:15 |
Bonnek wrote:
Still curious about the "89" Walter dogma. Is it because you still want to include a certain 89 album that you like or is it just a random thing that sounds cool to you but that is totally ridiculous for anyone else?
|
Could it be that 89 was the year that Clutching at straws was released or maybe the year he was born? I also have absolutely no idea why he goes on and on about it. He's a troll IMO.
|
|
|
Sckxyss
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 05 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1319
|
Posted: December 31 2010 at 03:00 |
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Bravo! Reason prevails against the defenders of post-89 thieves.
|
So wait, Roine Stolt and the Flower Kings are allowed to be derivative because he started making music before 1989? How is that any different than Anglagard doing the same thing (and much more effectively, IMO) in a different time period?
|
|
ferush
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: January 26 2011 at 17:38 |
I hope that's not a plan but a reality.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: January 26 2011 at 18:11 |
Yet another thread where people actually respond to Walter.
Thread failed. Abort.
|
|
|
Mr.Singularitarian
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 19 2010
Location: Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:50 |
well, i'm relatively new here, and i have to say that since i discovered progarchives and started reading threads i've always wondered if he was raped or something in 1989... otherwise i smile at such pseudo-rational, close-minded, dogmatic... i dont know... "chronophobic" arrongance
anyway, this is really marvellous news: i'm already enjoying very much this year's music, and i've got high hopes for what is yet to come! also, i probably would have never known Anglagard and other bands i'm loving if it wasn't for this website: so, despite what i said before, i find it a great place
|
|
Luna
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Funky Town
Status: Offline
Points: 12794
|
Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:53 |
He was born in 89, I believe.
|
|
|
Mr.Singularitarian
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 19 2010
Location: Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: February 06 2011 at 17:22 |
so he believes there's a cause-effect relation between his birth and music becoming crap?
|
|
Kallabow
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 14 2011
Location: Lithuania
Status: Offline
Points: 23
|
Posted: July 07 2011 at 13:11 |
Great!
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.