Änglagård plan new release for 2011!
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog News, Press Releases
Forum Description: Submit press releases, news , new releases, prog music news and other interesting things happening in the world of progressive music (featured in home and artist page)
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74458
Printed Date: January 07 2025 at 15:01 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Änglagård plan new release for 2011!
Posted By: martinprog77
Subject: Änglagård plan new release for 2011!
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 14:00
Replies:
Posted By: spleenache
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 14:15
Thanks for the great news.
I am sure I speak for many fans when i say that we have been waiting for this moment for a long long time. good luck with the new album. Looking forward to it.
|
Posted By: Tychovski
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 14:18
That's fantastic news! I thought they were over.
------------- Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974, it's a scientific fact.
|
Posted By: Todd
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 14:51
Knowing the pace of their decision-making, I'll be excited for a new album in 2016.
------------- "I have seen the broken sky turn blue."
http://gnosis2000.net/ratertodd.shtml" rel="nofollow - My Gnosis Ratings
|
Posted By: rdtprog
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 15:00
Posted By: Gayball86
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 15:44
Uhu!!!! It's a wonderfull! I'm very happy, band very good
------------- Gaybs
|
Posted By: The Hemulen
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 15:44
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Posted By: Andrea Cortese
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 15:58
I assume all PA members are happy with this new.
The main question is: what kinda music will they play in the new album???
|
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 17:27
Todd wrote:
Knowing the pace of their decision-making, I'll be excited for a new album in 2016. |
definitely, lol.
-------------
|
Posted By: Anthony H.
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 18:46
This is tremendous news! I hope it actually happens.
-------------
|
Posted By: topographicbroadways
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 19:18
this news is the best christmas present i've received, 2011 will be a great year first new stuff from Yes and now something new from Anglagard!
-------------
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 23:39
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Yep sums up my feelings as well
|
Posted By: sorcerer kermes
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 02:36
thats great! hope it`ll become the best album of 2011
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 02:37
CCVP wrote:
Todd wrote:
Knowing the pace of their decision-making, I'll be excited for a new album in 2016. |
definitely, lol.
|
I just hope this doesn't have the same faith as the long awaited 2008 King Crimson album
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 02:41
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
Posted By: bov
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 08:32
In 1992, an immensely popular (in Sweden) movie was released. Its name
was "Änglagård". The same year our beloved group released an album not
half as famous but incomparably much better.
In 1994, the follow-up was released for the crappy but popular movie,
as well as for the album.
Now I just read that the third part of the movie premiered a week ago and now this. Seems they miss by a year this time, still it's a funny coincidence.
http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=%E4nglag%E5rd" rel="nofollow - http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=%E4nglag%E5rd
|
Posted By: omardiyejon
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 10:47
2011 will be a fantastic year for progheads, i am really excited
------------- http://www.normalisr.com/?username=omardiyejon" rel="nofollow - http://www.normalisr.com/?username=omardiyejon
|
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 10:55
Thanks for the heads up!
-------------
|
Posted By: Conor Fynes
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 14:04
Posted By: Dorsalia
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 15:11
------------- "Es ist übrigens unmöglich, eine Meinung zu haben, ohne dass es unerfreuliche Überschneidungen gibt. Die Grünen sind für den deutschen Wald, die NPD ebenfalls."
|
Posted By: The Hemulen
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 05:05
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
Posted By: rdtprog
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 06:34
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
Anglagard have been original in their way of taking the influence of the 70's band to create their own sound. And their sound is not the same as any specific bands. The choice of using the same instruments of the 70's bands just give to their music a beautiful sound that is still enjoyable 40 years later.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 06:37
Even if Anglagard were heavily inspired by past's greatest, I would NEVER mistake their sound if I heard the a bit of their music without being told who's playing. It's unique.
|
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 08:04
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
-------------
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 11:26
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
In a recent thread, I made a New Year's Resolution to completely ignore the crap Walter comes out with. Maybe all of us should do the same
I am really looking forward to the new album.
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 03:24
lazland wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
In a recent thread, I made a New Year's Resolution to completely ignore the crap Walter comes out with. Maybe all of us should do the same
I am really looking forward to the new album.
|
best policy is to ignore him otherwise the thread becomes about him which is obviously what he wants
|
Posted By: SMSM
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 16:59
Re, best policy is to ignore him otherwise the thread becomes about him which is obviously what he wants
- good advice, and also applicable to apply to a number of those who state opinions on other websites as well, especially the arrogant indignant ones who can't take opinions they don't agree with.
Hopefully, given the legendary cult status of Anglagard will result in them signing with a label with half decent distribution (no major label that would try and make them radio friendly), and result in their previous recordings being made available again in reasonable numbers
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:15
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Bravo! Reason prevails against the defenders of post-89 thieves.
|
Posted By: Anthony H.
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:36
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Many people don't realize this about Roine. I think that he is one of the greatest composers and guitarists ever. But hater's certainly are gonna hate (I don't understand why).
-------------
|
Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:41
Still curious about the "89" Walter dogma. Is it because you still want to include a certain 89 album that you like or is it just a random thing that sounds cool to you but that is totally ridiculous for anyone else?
|
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 19:15
Bonnek wrote:
Still curious about the "89" Walter dogma. Is it because you still want to include a certain 89 album that you like or is it just a random thing that sounds cool to you but that is totally ridiculous for anyone else?
|
Could it be that 89 was the year that Clutching at straws was released or maybe the year he was born? I also have absolutely no idea why he goes on and on about it. He's a troll IMO.
-------------
|
Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: December 31 2010 at 03:00
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
CCVP wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Trouserpress wrote:
Excellent news! Imitators like Wobbler have never done much for me, but something new from Anglagard themselves would certainly be welcome!
|
Ironic, since this lousy derivative band does nothing but imitate 70s prog
|
I know I shouldn't bother feeding the troll, but f**k it, here goes...
I've never understood these kinds of lazy accusations which everyone seems to trot out the moment someone mentions Anglagard. If we were talking about The Flower Kings or other such 90s/00s bands who seem to think any song can be improved by stretching it out to twenty minutes with a few superfluous keyboard solos and sandwiching a completely different song in the middle then I'd be in agreement; bands like that really are just going over old ground.
But Anglagard, though 'retro' in mindset, actually did something new. Yes, they lay the mellotron on with a trowel, yes, you can hear echoes of Crimson at times (but you could say the same of 100s of other bands, all of them making unique and valid music) but to my ears Anglagard carved out a niche which was very much their own (until bands like Wobbler came along). Point me in the direction of ANY 70s band that produced music which sounded exactly, or at least pretty similar to that of Anglagard's and I'll admit defeat on this issue, but until then I shall continue to defend them against accusations of unoriginality.
|
I wouldn't bash the Flower Kings on that basis because the main composition hub of the band is Rione Stolt and the guy is in the prog scene since the 70's, so accusing him of sounding like the 70's and saying that it is a bad thing is the same as saying that Yes' recent albums are bad because they sound like Yes. It is one thing being around 20 and making music like they did 40 years ago and it is another being around 50 and making music similarly as you did when you were younger.
|
Bravo! Reason prevails against the defenders of post-89 thieves.
|
So wait, Roine Stolt and the Flower Kings are allowed to be derivative because he started making music before 1989? How is that any different than Anglagard doing the same thing (and much more effectively, IMO) in a different time period?
|
Posted By: ferush
Date Posted: January 26 2011 at 17:38
I hope that's not a plan but a reality.
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: January 26 2011 at 18:11
Yet another thread where people actually respond to Walter.
Thread failed. Abort.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Mr.Singularitarian
Date Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:50
well, i'm relatively new here, and i have to say that since i discovered progarchives and started reading threads i've always wondered if he was raped or something in 1989... otherwise i smile at such pseudo-rational, close-minded, dogmatic... i dont know... "chronophobic" arrongance
anyway, this is really marvellous news: i'm already enjoying very much this year's music, and i've got high hopes for what is yet to come! also, i probably would have never known Anglagard and other bands i'm loving if it wasn't for this website: so, despite what i said before, i find it a great place
|
Posted By: Luna
Date Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:53
He was born in 89, I believe.
------------- https://aprilmaymarch.bandcamp.com/track/the-badger" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Mr.Singularitarian
Date Posted: February 06 2011 at 17:22
so he believes there's a cause-effect relation between his birth and music becoming crap?
|
Posted By: Kallabow
Date Posted: July 07 2011 at 13:11
Great!
-------------
|
|