The creepy cult of modern faux liberalism

The T wrote: Triceratopsoil wrote: The T wrote: ^Yes but he might harbor much warmer feelings about that other famous German...  Yes, Beethoven is great Actually my bad. The famous one I was talking about is actually Austrian...  And not Mozart, Haydn, Schoenberg, Webern, Bruckner, Berg, or any other composer...

Ah yes, Arnold Schwarzenegger, of course

I'm not sure if someone brought this up, but there are more true heavier left leaning American Democrats in response to the ultra right wing Republican Tea Party in America. Is it possible that some may mistake some of this increase as being faux liberals?

Edited by RayRo - November 12 2015 at 14:37

Triceratopsoil wrote: ...... Should I quote you on this in 5 years when it comes true?  Actually it might be longer than that ....

BaldJean wrote: The T wrote: Triceratopsoil wrote: The T wrote: ^Yes but he might harbor much warmer feelings about that other famous German...  Yes, Beethoven is great Actually my bad. The famous one I was talking about is actually Austrian... a certain Mr. Schicklgruber

I can only imagine how much more difficult it would've been for him if he had stayed with that last name 

Triceratopsoil wrote: RayRo wrote: I'm not sure if someone brought this up, but there is more true left leaning American Democrats in response to the ultra right wing Republican Tea Party in America. Is it possible that some may mistake some of this increase as being faux liberals? When he said "faux liberals" OP was talking about the perpetually offended "your rights end where my feelings begin" crowd that dominates modern academia.  It has nothing very little to do with political parties.

I agree, but people do like to generalize and it seems like we've heard the word liberal stated more times in the last 10 years than in any time that I can remember.

Triceratopsoil wrote: KingCrInuYasha wrote: Triceratopsoil wrote: ... Don't worry, the progressives will legalize that any day now This is what anti-communists actually believe. Should I quote you on this in 5 years when it comes true?  Actually it might be longer than that, they are working on pedophilia first

I have read those articles (well, the Salon one). It clearly states that they think a pedophile is not a monster unless he acts on his impulses and becomes a child molester. Basically it is saying that pedophiles have a psychological problem but they are not all monsters because not all of them go and try to f**k children. But of course you didn't read that. You just googled the headlines.  

In Mr. Touched By A Communists's defense, Salon isn't a site I would trust for social issues.

KingCrInuYasha wrote: In Mr. Touched By A Communists's defense, Salon isn't a site I would trust for social issues.

5 out of 10 articles are OK, the other 5 are over-reacting crazy stuff. 

apparently "communist" and "pedophile" are synonyms for Mr. Triceratopsoil. or how else do I have to interpret this sudden occurrence of pedophilia in this thread?

Well, pedophilia is naturally the default "negative side" of Gay sexuality. While I know that it's used for propaganda by some, I have meet some men who were molested as young boys and these people are emotionally shattered for life.