Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 17:13 |
Did someone just fart?
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 17:26 |
Avantgardehead wrote:
I definitely wouldn't mind Sonic Youth and shoegaze being here!! I'd actually have something to do other than troll and make smart-aleck comments.
I might actually... like this site... again...!
|
Hey Dianne, welcome back! I trust you've had a good time away from the site, gazing at shoes.
|
|
Jonny Two Shoes
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 23 2008
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 18
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 19:07 |
On a further note....apologies to the mods.....passion took over reasoning :)
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 19:34 |
^ I probably should let your last post go but I won't-- Insulting young people? Not understanding why the Beatles are here and then screaming about it? We should get our heads out of our asses? No, no, no, that won't do at all.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
|
Posted: October 25 2008 at 03:04 |
Jonny Two Shoes wrote:
The exclusion of bands such as Stratovarius and the flaming of an awesome Evergrey album...I really think some of you need to get your heads straight.
|
I really like Evergrey, but you have to admit that their music has been getting less progressive with each release ... Torn and Monday Morning Apocalypse are only a shadow of their former music, as far as the progressiveness is concerned. Mind you: That doesn't necessarily mean that the new albums are bad ... there is not fixed relationship between progressiveness and quality, at least not for me.
Why not some more praise for the likes of David Bowie? and yet you get some guys who try to get the likes of Metallica in here without inclusion of more deserving bands.
|
Bowie was added months before Metallica ... what's your point?
The Beatles???????????????????????? FFS! and metallica wish they were prog! not to say they are bad...but come on lets try exclude the popular bullSh** just because you love 'em.
|
Metallica were not excactly a popular band during the 80s ... of course they were praised in metal magazines, but their mainstream popularity essentially began with the Black Album. In any case, popularity or personal preference has nothing to do with whether their music contained progressive elements or not. However, popularity and personal preference may help to speed up the addition process, because it simply means that the band gets suggested more often and it is more likely that those who make the decision have access to the music and know it well enough.
*sigh....total lack of what to say here :( feelings beyond words.
However to all who agree with this sentiment I give you my utmost respect. Peace :) |
And all others can go to hell? Why are you so angry?
|
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: October 25 2008 at 03:52 |
Oh my - Monday Morning Apocalypse was my first meeting with Evergrey, and one of the first CDs I reviewed when I started writing for prog4you a couple of years ago.
Somehow I was never tempted to check out any of their other stuff after going through that particular artistic doomsday...
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
|
Posted: October 25 2008 at 09:48 |
^ not the best album for "first contact". I'd recommend Recreation Day!
|
|
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Posted: October 25 2008 at 13:01 |
^ I'd recommend Solitude • Dominance • Tragedy (1999)and The Dark Discovery (1998)instead... (hope you don't mind)
|
|
The Prognaut
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 14 2004
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 1492
|
Posted: October 26 2008 at 22:32 |
I'm a headbanger alright, but I'm aware the Frisco band ain't got nothing to do in the depths of the Archives, that's for sure.
|
break the circle
reset my head
wake the sleepwalker
and i'll wake the dead
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 03:26 |
^Wow, I really understand the deep thought and appreciate the constructive criticism you've put into your post - most befitting of a collaborator.
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 04:26 |
Cloud Zero wrote:
I'm a headbanger alright, but I'm aware the Frisco band ain't got nothing to do in the depths of the Archives, that's for sure.
|
Oh oh.....
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 04:27 |
"Frisco" ? ..please
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 04:55 |
It's kinda funny in a sad way to see some of the reactions coming here.
For about a month there was a thread going discussing this band's addition, where arguments were called for from both sides to get as fair a verdict and as good grounds as possible for evaluation.
Where were the people complaining now when this went on?
And even after the addition when people complain in here, the line of reasoning rarely ventures beyond the lines of "Metallica aren't progressive because I think so", "It's obvious that Metallica aren't progressive" od the classic "they don't belong here".
As when the possible addition was first discussed, there are no arguments, just statements.
Is it really that hard to find a line of reasoning and to actually analyze a little to be able to post some opinions based on a more factual foundation - rather than throwing knee jerk reactions around?
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 05:02 |
^This whole thread was a bad idea (no offense intended to original poster). It was obvious straight away where this thread would lead. Someone was banned over this thread and we have the same unsubstantiated arguments happening again and again.. just a vicious cycle really. It's probably just best people leave their post "yes, there were a great/soso/bad inclusion" to the site, rather than stirring up more flames and arguing over their perceived lack of progressiveness.
|
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 05:26 |
Windhawk wrote:
It's kinda funny in a sad way to see some of the reactions coming here.
For about a month there was a thread going discussing this band's addition, where arguments were called for from both sides to get as fair a verdict and as good grounds as possible for evaluation.
Where were the people complaining now when this went on?
And even after the addition when people complain in here, the line of reasoning rarely ventures beyond the lines of "Metallica aren't progressive because I think so", "It's obvious that Metallica aren't progressive" od the classic "they don't belong here".
As when the possible addition was first discussed, there are no arguments, just statements.
Is it really that hard to find a line of reasoning and to actually analyze a little to be able to post some opinions based on a more factual foundation - rather than throwing knee jerk reactions around?
|
Comes with " post controversial addition territory" Olav The thread is almost frazzled and the circle long complete. The reviews in the main have been very good too I might add.
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 06:24 |
Yeah, good reviews what I have seen - without the site ever being in danger of turning into metallicareviews.com too
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 06:38 |
would of been nice if Steeleye Span got the same sort of positive reviews
|
|
Avantgardehead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 14:52 |
I too am glad to see that the site hasn't turned into MetallicaArchives with 40 topics a day on how great Metallica is and so forth. I've realized that this is probably just another passing fad like when everyone wanted to add hundreds of jazz artists here oh so long ago.
|
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
|
russellk
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 28 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 782
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 15:04 |
Not all Metallica reviews have been positive :)
|
|
The Prognaut
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 14 2004
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 1492
|
Posted: October 27 2008 at 15:15 |
Certif1ed wrote:
^Wow, I really understand the deep thought and appreciate the constructive criticism you've put into your post - most befitting of a collaborator. |
Don't get me wrong Cert. It's not only about splattering a flaming comment on the thread to deeply explain our likes or dislikes upon Metallica based on retrospectives, facts or grounds. Think it's all about respectable opinions wheter they're possitive or negative and never offensive.
I love the crunch and vicious harshness of Metallica, but to me they don't belong here. I believe there's a place for them within the warps of heavy metal or whatever you wanna call it. They ain't prog, that's for sure.
Before performing my part of Collab in the PA, I'm like many other around here, a voice and an opinion. The tag I'm entitled to, means nothing to a personal matter of perspective. And you should now better than that for all the seniority over the PA that back you up. So I rather believe that with your comment you were just being moronic instead of sarcastic!
Cheers amigo!
|
break the circle
reset my head
wake the sleepwalker
and i'll wake the dead
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.