Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tom Waits for RIO
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTom Waits for RIO

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
beaverteeth92 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 31 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Tom Waits for RIO
    Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:32
It's almost a crime that Tom Waits, probably among the most stylistically creative musical geniuses of the 20th Century is not on ProgArchives.  Virtually everything since "Swordfishtrombones" (and some stuff before it) has exemplified Waits's gritty, avant-garde style that has cemented his reputation as a musical tour-de-force.  He seems like an ideal candidate for RIO, as his most musically-similar counterpart, Captain Beefheart is listed under that label.

With regard to excluding him, I've heard the argument that because his first few albums were more jazzy and less proggy, he shouldn't be on here.  In that case, we should exclude Miles Davis, as nothing prior to "In A Silent Way" was fusion.
Back to Top
Sheavy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 28 2010
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 2866
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:37
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:40
He has been discussed here many times.
I'm a fan, but I'm not sure if he's strange enough for RIO or avant.
I'd give him a yes vote for crossover if he was sent there.
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
beaverteeth92 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 31 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:43
Not strange enough?  Underground and Poor Edward aren't "strange?"
Back to Top
Sheavy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 28 2010
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 2866
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:50
No, because he apparently never made any Avant Garde Prog rock songs.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67465
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:51
I agree with the Beefheart comparison, but I don't think Tom Waits has much to do with progressive rock. He's avant, but not prog.
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13849
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 14:54
There is a very good reason why Waits is not on PROG Archives. It's because he's not prog!
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 38303
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:19
Prog is in the ear of the behearer.  There is such diversity of music deemed Prog in the archives (the prog umbrella) that I think one is commonly on a very slippery slope when one creates an absolute prog/ non-prog divide -- especially when artists music can be diverse.  What is Prog (in terms of all thee styles represented by all the groups/ artists in PA)? And how can a person be prog? A person can be male or female, Chinese or French, but Prog? And even if one means that person has made or not made Prog music, or commonly both with names in PA, who has the absulute truth?

As for if I think Tom Waits is suitable for any PA category (including Prog Related), I haven't heard enough of his music.  My general opinion is that the Prog/ non Prog dichotomy is often overemphasized, and I prefer not to think of is something prog proper, but could it fit a category at PA.  When someone is suggested and supported by quite a few as Tom Waits has been, I find it hard to belive that the case has no merit (has merit to those who suggested him which gives it merit to me despite any preconceived notions -- doesn't mean I'd approve something becuase of that if I were on a team, but I wouldn't easily dismiss it).  You, Lazland, are probably much more famialir with his music than I, but we all bring our own biases and perspectives.


Edited by Logan - October 15 2011 at 15:23
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:22
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Prog is in the ear of the behearer.  There is such diversity of music deemed Prog in the archives (the prog umbrella) that I think one is commonly on a very slippery slope when one creates an absolute pro/ non-prog divide -- especially when artists music can be diverse.


I don't think the divide is absolute, but as we're not prepared to catalog every musical artist that's ever lived, some boundaries are appropriate.  Wink
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:27
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

There is a very good reason why Waits is not on PROG Archives. It's because he's not prog!

There is quite a lot of non prog in prog archives.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 38303
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:28
Pat: I don't mean to imply otherwise, but the boundaries can be very hazy and limitations can be very subjective (sometimes depending upon too limited material one knows and a lack of understanding of the categories parameters as well as people having different perceptions of what can be prog umbrella music).

Some people have said that Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock should not be on this site; whereas I thought both essential JRF additions.


Edited by Logan - October 15 2011 at 15:31
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
beaverteeth92 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 31 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:34
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

There is a very good reason why Waits is not on PROG Archives. It's because he's not prog!

But Deep Purple, The Beatles, Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock, The Doors, Jimi Hendrix, Led Zeppelin, Wishbone Ash, Black Sabbath, and Blue Öyster Cult are?  As in all of them are more "progressive" than Tom Waits?

How exactly are we defining the differences between Avant-Garde rock and Avant Prog?  Because it doesn't seem like there's anything separating the two other than that one category contains bands that members of this website may not like for whatever reason.


Edited by beaverteeth92 - October 15 2011 at 15:38
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:36
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

There is a very good reason why Waits is not on PROG Archives. It's because he's not prog!

There is quite a lot of non prog in prog archives.
 
Just because that is the case that doesn't mean we should add more non prog.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
beaverteeth92 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 31 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:39
If that's the case, would you recommend removing non-prog artists like Blue Öyster Cult and Led Zeppelin?
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 38303
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:43
They're in Prog Related of course, which may be a good place for Tom Waits (though I wonder, quite doubt, if he could sufficiently fit the criteria for addtion there).  Some purists say we should get rid of Prog Related.


Edited by Logan - October 15 2011 at 15:46
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:44
Originally posted by beaverteeth92 beaverteeth92 wrote:

If that's the case, would you recommend removing non-prog artists like Blue Öyster Cult and Led Zeppelin?


Those artists are in a special non-prog category that, much to my personal dismay, exists here.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:45
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

There is a very good reason why Waits is not on PROG Archives. It's because he's not prog!

There is quite a lot of non prog in prog archives.
 
Just because that is the case that doesn't mean we should add more non prog.

I never came to any conclusion. All acts should be judged on their own merits.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 38303
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:47
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by beaverteeth92 beaverteeth92 wrote:

If that's the case, would you recommend removing non-prog artists like Blue Öyster Cult and Led Zeppelin?


Those artists are in a special non-prog category that, much to my personal dismay, exists here.


Why does the category bother you?
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:52
Originally posted by beaverteeth92 beaverteeth92 wrote:

If that's the case, would you recommend removing non-prog artists like Blue Öyster Cult and Led Zeppelin?
 
Well yeah, I would prefer they weren't here but they aren't going to be removed. I don't like the PR category as a whole, but it's here so the best I can do is ignore it (and occasionally bitch about it. Tongue)
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2011 at 15:54
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by beaverteeth92 beaverteeth92 wrote:

If that's the case, would you recommend removing non-prog artists like Blue Öyster Cult and Led Zeppelin?


Those artists are in a special non-prog category that, much to my personal dismay, exists here.


Why does the category bother you?
ClapClap, Greg...great points made above this post too. Subjective is probably becoming the most important word on PABig smile
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.