The Year is 2800

I'm tempted to say "It won't be pretty 'cause I'll be dead by then."

One show provides all the evidence:  Futurama.  They showed civilization dying off several times between now and the year 3000, so I'm going to say Yes, but it won't be pretty.

Voted for :
Yes but it won't be pretty*

*Probably to be inferred that humandkind will be even less loveable than we are now.

I voted for the second option. 

Thanks to the global warning naysayers, we're probably going to have to be someplace else. The question is whether in 800 years we can develop technologies to travel and colonize other locations... 

I'll bet we still won't have hover boots.

Yes but not pretty.

I'm thinking WALL-E.

2800? Sure we'll be here, in a manner of speaking, though at the very least we won't be very much like we are now. We'll have survived a couple of apocalypses, seen climate change come and go, maybe nuclear winter in some areas, but that passes in time. It's very unlikely humanity will die out anytime soon even from nuclear war. 9As far as I can think the most deadly and fearful human extinction even there is is a genetically engineered virus that can attack and kill various populations of people. This, if not possible now, should be completely possible in less than 100 years). By 2800 we'd have recouped any losses, overcome human population problems with controlled breeding, food problems with effective land management (skyscraper farms etc), and have terraformed the f**k out of Mars to a point where millions or more people are living there. If humanity makes it that far, unless there's a HUGE backlash, we'll all be cybernetic and connected by some sort of wireless Internet system internally (think real-life first-person shooter HUBs and universal knowledge). I imagine there may not even be breeding per se unless there is also forced "retirement" (suicide/murder) after a certain age because in 800 years, we're certainly to have the technology to completely rebuild the human body (if maybe not the brain, completely), thus making us at least somewhat immortal.

Think about it, people. 800 years into the future at this rate of technological advance? To think we wouldn't have terraformed Mars, become cybernetic, and interconnected is not aiming too high.

Henry Plainview wrote: Now, if you had a time machine, would you rather go into the future and find out, or travel into the past? I think I'd rather see the future, although if I could only go once I might use it to hang out with Jesus.

According to some hypothesis buy a sciency guy, you could never travel back to a time when the machine you're traveling in didn't exist. No past for u.

What if you go so far forward you go backward? Kind of like being so far out you're too far in.