Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
Crossover Prog vs. Progressive Pop |
Post Reply 
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | |
IndianaParkWars 
Forum Newbie 
Joined: January 12 2021 Location: Buffalo Status: Offline Points: 26 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(1)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Crossover Prog vs. Progressive PopPosted: January 12 2021 at 22:50 |
|
What is the difference between the two? They both seem like the same thing to me, a variation of progressive rock with elements related to pop whether it's in the structure, style, or sound of the music.
|
|
 |
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member 
VIP Member Joined: July 20 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ USA Status: Offline Points: 7266 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 12 2021 at 23:17 |
Welcome to PA! I'll let some others comment, I admit that the terms used around here can be confusing!!
|
|
|
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
|
|
|
|
|
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 07 2019 Location: Culver City, CA Status: Offline Points: 3036 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 12 2021 at 23:43 |
|
I think Crossover is a broader term. A band/artist that would consistently be considered Progressive Pop would probably end up under Crossover here. If they have a few works that would be Progressive Pop, they may be put as Prog Related here instead. But Crossover Prog is not synonymous with Progressive Pop.
|
|
|
|
|
Frenetic Zetetic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2017 Location: Now Status: Offline Points: 9233 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 12 2021 at 23:49 |
|
They're synonyms as far as I'm concerned, but I'm not a pro in that sub-genre!
|
|
|
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021 |
|
|
|
|
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer 
Joined: September 10 2020 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline Points: 4133 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 00:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 01:02 |
|
Crossover prog doesn't necessarily have to be rooted in pop. Any (fairly) simple genre will do. Obviously there is alot of cross pollination, and if something has strong enough pop leanings but still manages to be progressive it would land there.
|
|
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|
|
|
|
IndianaParkWars
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 12 2021 Location: Buffalo Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 01:12 |
|
Hmm. So would Progressive Pop then be a subgenre of Crossover Prog? Along with Progressive Folk, Progressive Bluegrass, Progressive Metal, and Progressive House?
I'm guessing the parent genre is Progressive Rock, which breaks up into its many subgenres, Crossover Prog being one of them. And then maybe Crossover Prog breaks down into other non-rock Prog genres? Am I onto something or going totally off the wrong track?
|
|
|
|
|
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 10 2020 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline Points: 4133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 01:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Frenetic Zetetic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2017 Location: Now Status: Offline Points: 9233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 01:29 |
|
"Music most people would refrain from listening to on their own volition" is a more succinct description of most prog in general LOL.
|
|
|
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021 |
|
|
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 10:19 |
|
Hmm....I looked at the Crossover Prog section and none of the 'main entries' there are all that 'poppy'
to me (perhaps Supertramp at times...)...I would ask which specific bands are poeople referring to that straddle those two categories...?
Edited by dr wu23 - January 13 2021 at 10:20 |
|
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
|
|
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Offline Points: 40187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 10:45 |
I think Kate Bush is one Crossover Prog artist who's more pop than prog.
 |
|
|
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 12:15 |
|
Everything nowadays is Crossover Prog, "prog" being the key word as nothing is "progressive" anymore, it's all been done and recorded.
Progressive Pop, to me describes a pop song that might be using some off tempo, odd measures different structures to the sound but being 100% pop in nature where 4/4 is the main theme. Rick Beato does those videos "I listened to the Top 10 Pop Songs..." and he breaks down the ones that are interesting to him musically. There are some he highlights that catch his attention regarding tempo, pace, odd measures/beats and use of acoustic/analog instruments. In most cases he deems the songs pretty generic riffs......
|
|
  
|
|
|
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 13:48 |
|
Crossover wears capes and fishnets.
|
|
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|
|
|
|
Argo2112
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2017 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 4462 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 13:51 |
|
Not sure who you would put in the progressive pop category.
Asia maybe? 80's Genesis? Some Bowie?
Edited by Argo2112 - January 13 2021 at 13:54 |
|
|
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Offline Points: 40187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 14:04 |
|
A bird in the band is worth two in the Kate Bush.
|
|
|
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 15:16 |
Both Asia and Genesis are rock bands, not pop. I have not thought about what bands, possibly bands like Chicago, Fleetwood Mac....It's tough cause these bands could still be/are rock. I would push myself to state that it could be artists like Madonna, Lady Gaga, Prince, Maroon 5 artists that are 100% pop, although Prince crossed into many genres and I don't know Maroon 5 but they are popular it seems. To me both Madonna and Lady Gaga are very progressive for their genre of music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Online Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 15:37 |
|
For me most (if not all)of the bands labelled as crossover on here could also be considered what I would call art rock. That is to say stuff like 10cc, supertramp, Styx, Ambrosia, Moody Blues, City Boy, Roxy Music etc. That is to say bands that mostly focus on shorter songs but with all the prog toppings. Neo prog sort of picked up where these bands left off but were more influenced by Yes, Genesis and Camel where as these bands were contemporaries of those bands and so weren't really influenced by them. That's the way I see it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
IndianaParkWars
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 12 2021 Location: Buffalo Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 15:57 |
|
Understandable! But I think I may enjoy theorizing/classifying/organizing just as much as I enjoy listening to music!
I'm working on a project where I'm exploring all the different genres, subgenres, styles, and movements and defining them and organizing them, etc. Crossover vs Progressive Pop was a roadblock, but I think I know how to push through it.
|
|
|
|
|
IndianaParkWars
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 12 2021 Location: Buffalo Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 16:07 |
|
Okay, so I'm looking at all of the response and I did a lot of thinking myself. I think I might have a cohesive answer between the different subgenres. Everyone seems to be hitting the right spots of where I think I'm getting with it.
So, to me Crossover Prog seems like Progressive Rock that has elements of other genres (beyond the normal genre-busting nature of prog) like pop, folk, bluegrass, jazz, etc. but not enough of that element to classify it as a different subgenre (like Progressive Pop, Progressive Folk, Progressive Bluegrass, Jazz Fusion, etc.). So, Crossover Prog is Progressive Rock with elements of other genres but not enough to substantiate it as a different subgenre or enough to say it's just plain-old Progressive Rock. It seems Crossover Prog is the term created for those in-betweeners. Also, I feel like Crossover Prog can include a mixture of genres that are crossed-over, like a little bit of folk and pop but not enough to be considered another genre and not lacking so much that it's not just Progressive Rock. I see Progressive Pop less as a Progressive Rock with pop elements genre and more of a Pop genre with Progressive elements. SO............. anyway I feel like you can classify The Moody Blues as a few different genres. Symphonic Rock, Progressive Rock, Psychedelic Rock. But, I think they're also Crossover Prog. (These might vary between songs and albums as well). But, The Beach Boys have progressive elements but they're more of a pop band. They're also Surf Rock and Pop Rock, but for their more progressive music, I would call them Progressive Pop, since the nature of the music is pop with some prog elements rather than prog with some pop elements. It's nitpicky as f#ck, but I think this may be the best way to analyze this. And it's all part of my genre project, so it falls into place in the big picture :)
|
|
|
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 13 2021 at 16:45 |
|
^ Right........If your gonna try to define Progressive Pop, it needs to be like you state, pop music with some prog elements, so I'd also add it should be called Prog Pop. Nothing is progressive anymore, it's all been done.
And the prog elements can be anything, not just related to what we understand as prog. Parliament/Funkadelic was hugely progressive in their early days, as most bands were. Jazz was one of the biggest progressive music genres, so much experimentation going on its cra-cra!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
IndianaParkWars wrote: