1 Registration Process for FORUM+Review |
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Author | ||
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Topic: 1 Registration Process for FORUM+Review Posted: February 04 2005 at 14:08 |
|
Max has said he could make it so only members of this forum could post reviews. http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3317&a mp;PN=1&TPN=2 Sounds like a good idea to me.Why should people who cant take the trouble to become members be allowed to have reviews displayed on the Archive? |
||
|
||
Azrael2112
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 19 2004 Status: Offline Points: 246 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 14:22 | |
I agree!
|
||
arcer
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 01 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1239 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 14:24 | |
Definitely, the four-line dross submitted for most albums makes the site look amateurish - Prospective reviewers should at least have to join and dip into the forums to see how amateurish we really are ... |
||
mirco
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2005 Location: Venezuela Status: Offline Points: 819 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 15:05 | |
That seems a little fundamentalist to me. I someone is a good critic, and has taste and love for the music, but doesn't want to participate in a forum, why don't let him posts his reviews? On the other hand, I approve the deleting of pointless or amateuristic reviews, in order to mantain the level of this great site.
|
||
Please forgive me for my crappy english!
|
||
gdub411
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 24 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3484 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 15:10 | |
What difference would it really make? All someone would have to do is sign up and never post....so what's the dif?
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 15:26 | |
I'm not sure about it. 1. It may lead to a huge number of inactive (postless) forummembers, that's not a big problem but it gives a wrong impression of the size of this forum. already their are more than 1000 members, of which less than 50? are truly active 2. It may scare of reviewers, who do not want to join a forum, or share more than their reviews 3. Thev diversity in reviews is what make the review section great. Amateurs and non-musicians have a different way of reviewing than muscisians and trained reviewers. (I'm an amateur) Their reviews are often more emotional and focus more on general appeal than on musical purity or perfection (not happy with this sentence but it'll do)
I don't see any real advantage aside from the more controlability of the issued reviews, and the avoidance of trolling. Maybe their should be a better control on the apropriatness of reviews, and maybe their should be some moderators who check the reviews for apropriatness. The quality of a review is not something to debate about. some people are capable of producing great technical reviews, other people are not that articulate, or have more difficulty to transpose their thoughts and ideas to writing. that doesn't lessen the potential importance of such a review.
I'm sorry I'm not very good with words, but this is my general idea about it |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 15:30 | |
You could PM them if you didnt like their review and ask them to discuss it. |
||
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 15:47 | |
"You could PM them if you didnt like their review and ask them to discuss it.
1. How do you PM someone who only comes in for one review and then never appears again. 2. People might get upset when someone tells them that their review is bad, and consequentially stay away from this site. (asuming that they wrote the review with good intend). 3. who should do the PM-ing, the moderators? or can it be anybody? And who's to decide which review is bad? 4. The forum is for discussion and the review section is for reviewing. When I issue a review it's my final word about that album (in time it can change of course) and I have no wish to defend myself on how or why I wrote that review.we shouldn't drag every review we partialy or entirely oppose to into a discussion thread.
I agree on the accountability remark. on that account It may help in keeping the reviews free from spamming or trolling. but it will work more as a barrier for good reviewers than that it will keep people away with bad intend. hope this makes sense |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:19 | |
I think it's a great idea - there are pros and cons either way - but if you make the mp3s downloadable to members only too, that would be a real incentive to people who really are interested in prog.
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:26 | |
That would be depriving the people who might get interested in prog through the mp3's from an accessable source of good prog songs. Aren't the mp3 ment as an introduction to progressive music in general. when only for members, people will sooner run away to other site's and explore music somewhere else. I think sites like this should be as open to public as possible. the occasional Britney fans shouldn't be kept away or be facing a barrier. They should be welcomed, brainwashed and set free to spread the gospel. |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:27 | |
100% in favour of that too! |
||
|
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:30 | |
Tux: Ye-es, but I think it's a bit dodgy offering mp3's of bands anyway - I made all the points I want to make in the mp3 legal or not thread that was running a while back, but basically, while it's legal for Canadians to upload mp3s, it's not legal to distribute copyright IP without the owner's express permission. Edited by Certif1ed |
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:35 | |
I was only stating some ideas. BTW can't the requerement to register first before downloading be considered a way of purchasing the mp3? in that way the site would be selling copyrighted material instead of offering it entirely for free? just a question. |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
Richardw
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 10 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 762 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 16:36 | |
I vote No. I don't see why being a member of the forum has anything to do with the album reviews.
|
||
Joren
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 07 2004 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 6667 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:04 | |
NO! We would miss a lot of reviews! There are many albums on the archives that have not been reviewd by a forum member, but by an outsider. Then you would delete the review an then nobody would know an opinion about that album. A GREAT LOSS. And I think everybody should be allowed to write a review. What if you like to write reviews but don't like do argue about stupid things like we do?
|
||
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:27 | |
Surely that's... more illegal? |
||
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:30 | |
Why would you want to read reviews from non-forum members? You could go to another forum to do that! |
||
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:33 | |
In general I take more notice of reviews by forummembers and I take them more serious, but.... Edited by tuxon |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:45 | |
Some forummembers are actively making reviews, so there are long-term contributors already. some long-term contributors, are hardly envolved in the forum, they just post a review and don't bother about the forum. The issue is if I'm correct to avoid bad inapropriate reviews. Instead of going about it at the portal of this site, maybe we should keep an eye out for reviews that are inapropriate, and stop it from there. in the same manner as we do now. |
||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2004 Location: Sao Tome and Pr Status: Offline Points: 5187 |
Posted: February 04 2005 at 17:48 | |
Nah, I want to create my own issue were we go all isolationist, ban free trade and invade non-prog sites and kick the sh*t out of them! |
||
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |