Is Rush prog |
Post Reply | Page <1 891011> |
Author | ||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 17853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is why Rush is prog. Close thread.
|
||
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 12074 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
|
||
Bj-1
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 04 2005 Location: No(r)Way Status: Offline Points: 31530 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yeah. Prog. |
||
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65445 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
How is Graham, haven't talked to him in awhile. |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
rushaholic
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 13 2005 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1140 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
thank you for this! still more on this thread. and again - call em whatever you want. tired of the labels tbh. wonderful band. incredible video and performance. fantastic song. |
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 2014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Does a bear 💩 in the woods?
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Oh, Moriarty, you're a saucy one.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 2014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Does a one-legged duck swim in a circle?
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's clear that progressive/prog concerts at this level will cease to exist....I knew once Rush stopped touring experiencing this is not possible anymore. I'm glad for the videos to help me remember what amazing performances they always gave and the incredible joy it was to see them live over my past 40+ years with Rush in my musical life. Yes a wonderful band.....
|
||
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 36532 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ That performance beats this one:
|
||
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 10 2020 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline Points: 5072 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Why is such a question even necessary? And above all, why does it matter if Rush are prog? They weren't when they started out, then Neal Peart traveled to Europe, heard some great music, came back to Canada and brought in these different influences as the story goes. Their music did get quite proggy in the late 70s and remained so for a couple more years in the 80s (although one might make the argument that they never really refrained from the progressive rock sound [whatever that sound might be, right ] until the end of their career). So in a word, Rush is indeed a progressive rock band for me, based on being familiar with their music and their massive and probably immeasurable influence over hundreds of prog bands and virtually the entire progressive metal movement/sub-genre. Really surprised seeing such a post in early 2025, I think some people ought to move on; the genre is evolving and is in fact alive and well. It also has its new forerunners, heroes, globetrotters, whatever you want to call them... but why re-munch the same old boring themes from decades ago. Not that I completely disapprove of discussions of old bands (especially when I participate or sometimes initiate them) but the fact that they are still dominating over discussions of newer bands is frustrating.
Edited by A Crimson Mellotron - January 10 2025 at 12:08 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 36532 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
^ It's not necessary. This topic is trolling. As for if it matters, from one perspective, this is Prog Archives, so I can understand why it would matter to an archive of prog and people who not only build but those who use these archives.
I find these kind of "this or not this" dichotomies silly, whether coming from a troll like with this topic or more earnest people. I see Prog as a spectrum, an umbrella, the term can be so nebulous and there are no clear-cut boundaries (in fact the lack of clear boundaries is part of kind of the point of progressive rock and progressive music commonly). It's amorphous. And a band/artist can release both Prog and non-prog material. I would sooner claim that Rush released prog material than Rush is prog in-and-of-itself. That said, I'm fine with describing Rush aa a Prog band, even if not everything they released is Prog. because the relation to prog is a big part of Rush's identity. Rush: Prog? Check! Hard rock? Check! AOR? Check! Pop Rock? Check! Bootycore? If you consider some of the album covers. Edited by Logan - January 10 2025 at 12:27 |
||
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 10 2020 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline Points: 5072 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^Bootycore is what they're particularly good at!
Edited by A Crimson Mellotron - January 10 2025 at 12:50 |
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's a very progy performance.....
|
||
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Your right.....not needed for the masses or those that have been on PA for so long. But I welcome the (non trolling) question about this as it may be coming from a prog newbie who is just getting into this F*up prog rabbit hole and needs help.
|
||
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I do too, but the person who started the thread had no such issue.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Word....hence not much input from my end. But I welcome the honest question about if a band is prog or WTF do we call them on PA .
|
||
|
||
TexasKing
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2016 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 579 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would say Rush is MORE PROG than Pink Floyd, but LESS PROG than Yes, Genesis and King Crimson.
Their two most successful albums are generally not prog in my book: 2112 is straight up classic hard rock (not much different than Zeppelin/Deep Purple style of hard rock) and that album is very popular with hard rock fans for a reason; Moving Pictures - it's mostly AOR and arena rock, only two tracks can pass as prog rock (The Camera Eye and YYZ). Out of classic prog names only Pink Floyd (I personally consider them barely prog) and Rush have a big portion of non-prog public. It seems that Rush and King Crimson generally don't share the SAME AUDIENCE.
Edited by TexasKing - 12 hours 35 minutes ago at 14:04 |
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ highly contentious for all sorts of reasons. BUT 'prog' in the seventies was narrow. There were a whole raft of bands that were not prog but now considered so. Even Jethro Tull were barely prog compared to ELP, Yes, Genesis and Crimson. Those were the big four. Tull were a heavy folk blues band with some prog pretensions. Rush were a hard rock band with some prog pretensions. Floyd were a psyche band with some prog pretensions. As so we can go on. However we can't just draw the boundaries how we like according to our personal tastes IMO.
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Let's just say the 1970s were the greatest decade ever.
Any period with Andy Kaufman and Prog was not to be missed. Edited by Atavachron - 50 minutes ago at 01:49 |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 891011> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |