/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
|
QM: Does Time exist? |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 789 |
| Author | |
MikeEnRegalia 
Special Collaborator 
Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 14 hours 7 minutes ago at 03:35 |
|
^ Science by definition cannot be incomplete, since it includes all approaches which reliably describe the world we live in. You reject science and insist not only that there is more, but that you know more than science can know.
Put in another way: You insist that there is more than pure rationality. Which is irrational by definition.
 |
|
 |
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 4 hours 10 minutes ago at 13:32 |
|
^ I do not reject science, and I surely do not know that there is more, or know more than science can know, I merely know I don't know. In other words science is only complete in a theoretic way, by which I mean the very statement "science can know" suggests it does not yet know all things about all things. Science can know but does not always know.
Y'know? |
|
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 2 hours 35 minutes ago at 15:07 |
|
^ My point is that by definition science is the only way to KNOW anything with a reasonable degree of certainty.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 789 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
