QM: Does Time exist? |
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Author | |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ Please define either "scalar energy" or "scalar wave" in scientific terms.
EDIT: Here's some varied opinions about the topic. Some of them are hilarious, some are serious. I'm quoting one of the posts for sh*ts and giggles:
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - 16 hours 27 minutes ago at 01:03 |
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Online Points: 65224 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ It was all fine until the Biblical nonsense at the end.
|
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ Yes, that was unnecessary. Also he spelled "seamlessly" wrong
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - 16 hours 8 minutes ago at 01:22 |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Another nice physics resource I came across: The "Crackpot Index"
|
|
Starshiper
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 08 2024 Location: Englantic Status: Offline Points: 382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Professor Dr. Konstantin Meyl, a German electronics and energy
engineer, here gives an interesting and instructive lecture about the
science of scalar energy and its applications in medicine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAZRconRsLw
|
|
Starshiper
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 08 2024 Location: Englantic Status: Offline Points: 382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ Yes, he scores many points on the Crackpot Index. Most importantly, his theories contradict Quantum Field Theory and Special Relativity. Translation for non-scientific people:
His theories are wrong. Incorrect. Worse than imaginary (since a nimaginary theory might still turn out to be correct). Debunked.
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - 15 hours 32 minutes ago at 01:58 |
|
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ You can post all those trash you want from the
internet but that doesn't take away personal experience (i have plenty
of it). Have you never been to a Traditional Chinese medicine doctor?
Have you never received acupuncture? Even modern medical science accepts
it as a legit practice and they have no idea why it works. You don't
get it. You made that quite clear. Many of these videos are purposefully
constructed to make it look impossible. Unless you have researched this
for at least a decade, you're not even remotely qualified to have a
discussion really. No offense.
|
|
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BTW there is NO controversy in advanced physics that scalar waves exist. It is unknown exactly how they are generated but that is also true of gravity and other forces. Here's just one synopsis you can find that explains it in a more scientific fashion. If you catch DARPA lectures and the like you can sit in on entire presentations. Given that it's so nebulous and advanced very few are up to the task. |
|
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ You have no idea how science works. Science is just not for you. What you call "science" is actually the opposite. You have read a lot of papers and watched a lot of videos which make bold assertions but conflict with experiments which actual scientists have done over and over again around the globe. These actual scientists have imagined theories and laws which make precise predictions that have not only been validated by other scientists, but no attempt to falsify them has ever been successful.
Like I said above, scalar energy theory contradicts special relativity. Do you use GPS navigation? If you do, you might be surprised to learn that it relies, among other things, on special relativity. So does your GPS navigation work? By all means give it a try, conduct an experiment. If it does work, then congratulations, you have just verified that scalar energy theory is wrong.
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - 7 hours 57 minutes ago at 09:33 |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, that "David Publishing" paper is the one that turns up when one does their "google research"
|
|
progaardvark
Collaborator Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams Joined: June 14 2007 Location: Sea of Peas Status: Offline Points: 50894 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I sometimes like to fall into these rabbit holes and wander around a bit to see what's going on. I have to say that Bahman Zohuri is quite a character. Retracted books at Springer (granted, not all of them). Seems to have disappeared from the University of New Mexico because of these retracted books (not entirely sure, but the timing is right; academic institutions like to keep this stuff quiet) and is now at a business school at Golden Gate University writing on all kinds of subjects unrelated to a business school, often in disreputable journals published by predatory publishers (i.e., probably not peer reviewed or peer reviewed by some bloke off the street). He's the CEO of an engineering consulting firm which doesn't appear to have updated its website since 2009. Very curious fellow.
I find this article to be absolutely hilarious: The title is stating that these things are true science and not pseudoscience or fiction, but the bulk of the memorandum in a roundabout way states the opposite. It's a big WTF written in pseudo-science-ese. No peer reviewed journal would have ever published this. And I'm saying this with an inkling of experience in that I have been published twice in a library science journal. Granted that's not the same field, but I knew I was dealing with really good peer reviewers that made my articles so much better than they were when I submitted them.
|
|
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ I also dug a little into Konstantin Meyl. He was a professor at a German university, but they distanced themselves from his pseudoscientific theories and he was not permitted to mention them in his capacity as professor.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |