QM: Does Time exist?

Valdez wrote: (Takes long hit off bong… cough cough)

Nice.   I smoked for years but had to stop due to a condition that causes terrible stomach pain & nausea called Cannabis Hyperemises.   I occasionally miss it but the cravings pass.   Now I just drink Scotch.

I don't and never will smoke weed for two reasons.

1. It's strictly banned in my country.
2. I'm poor and have a tendency for addictions. Weed would drain all my money in no time. I mean, it's not dirt cheap.

Edited by Hrychu - Yesterday at 01:28

...then watch them in rapid sequence.

"Rapid sequence" is a time-dependent operation. You're using something that depends on time to define time.

Edited by wiz_d_kidd - 22 hours 9 minutes ago at 06:40

I have not read either of the 2 books, but they seem fascinating.  Both authors could be right in their own way.

 

Space and time are inseparable. The faster you travel through space, the slower you travel through time. This has been experimented with and demonstrated many times over.  Theoretically, if you can travel at the speed of light, time would essentially stop.  Does this mean that time does not really exist?

 

I think that it exists experientially but not in “reality”.  Similar to matter not being real, only existing experientially.  

 

“Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.”  - Alber Einstein

^ Which implies there is no 'God'.

^ Or the universe & natural world is God. In other words there is no God.

CosmicVibration wrote: progaardvark wrote: I read Barbour's book back when it came out. I remember it being a rather dry, difficult read. If I'm remembering it correctly, much of it had to do with Planck length (or maybe Planck time?) and the "nows" were separated by this. It's an interesting idea, but I sometimes wonder if this is just mathematics trying to find a different reality that may not actually be there. I never read Smolin's book. Valdez wrote: <span style=": rgb248, 248, 252;">If consciousness (as we reckon it) didn't exist, then time wouldn't either. </span> That's a curious idea worthy of thinking about. It sort of reminds me a bit of Donald Hoffman's studies on this in which he considers consciousness as something fundamental in the universe and the physical world emerges from that. It's kind of hard to wrap my brain around that, but curious nonetheless. <p ="Msonormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%">Science boils down everything to just 2 components, energy and consciousness.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>All matter is energy fluctuations. Matter is not solid or motionless. If matter is comprised of energy, then can energy be comprised of consciousness? <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>If so, the physical world emerges from it, along with the universe and anything in creation.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>Tis all a dream..<o:p></o:p></span>

Isn’t Hoffman the guy who says (in essence) that we are in a construct similar to a video game, limited by a VU headset (our brains eyes and senses) that isn’t capable of giving us the entire view of our surroundings? That our perception is limited and basically created by our collective consciousness? Maybe it is a dream like Einstein said “a very persistent dream” lol

The concept of time is related to the succession of our ideas. We can perceive time in different ways depending on how fast or slow our mind is working. If your mind is occupied in a work environment compared to if you are doing nothing more than sitting in your chair. Time is not existing outside our perceptions. When I feel that the days are going too fast, I am always questioning myself if I am doing the right thing and if it's not better to slow things down in our everyday life. But  the sad thing is that we have to work if we can enjoy sitting in our chairs at home...

Edited by octopus-4 - 2 hours 37 minutes ago at 02:12

Atavachron wrote: ^ Which implies there is no 'God'.

Edited by octopus-4 - 2 hours 20 minutes ago at 02:29