Worst prog lyricists |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
Hrychu
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 03 2013 Location: poland? Status: Offline Points: 5358 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BTW the voice who says "The Rednex, Shockin'!" at 2:24 mark is none other than Nad fricking Sylvan. :D Edited by Hrychu - November 12 2024 at 06:56 |
|
On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.
Ernest Vong |
|
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 11593 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Robert Wyatt is normally not a bad lyricist, but when he sings the alphabet?
|
|
Hrychu
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 03 2013 Location: poland? Status: Offline Points: 5358 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.
Ernest Vong |
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't know who wrote Greg or ELP's lyrics before Pete Sinfield arrived, but in general, him, Keith Reid (Procol), Pete Brown (Cream, and J Bruce) or Palmer James (Crimson, Supertramp & Emergency) had obscure poetry talents, which I won't condemn on the account that it doesn't make sense to me. |
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi, I look at it a bit .... left field. I (more or less) started with the things that were called "art rock", and one of the important things for some of those works, was the POETRY, and how it was presented ... we got to understand that "lyrics" were not only mundane, but also silly, in most radio stuff in the early days, and psychedelia poked a huge hole in that idea, by making fun of it, so to speak ... but the main difference ... no one was going to confuse the poetry showing in The Moody Blues to the crap in yummy yummy I got love in my tummy ... which is the ugly stuff that "art rock" wanted to get away from. In some ways, the word "art rock" just about makes sense here, instead of comparing the lyrics to another era or poet ... and this is the hard part of this thread, when "lyricists" are kinda comparing a lot of writers to just a bunch of songs, that ... I suppose we could say have no literary value in them? But the song became famous and sold, see? These days, I no longer look at "lyrics" as poor poetry, or vice versa, as there are many folks out there that are quite capable, except that no one is going to publish a book of their "poetry" .... like so many did for Jim Morrison, Peter Hammill, and so others. I don't even know if Pete Brown had any books published, but we know that his "ability" with lyrics went downhill after Cream for some reason, if some of the stuff he did afterwards was a clue.
Edited by moshkito - November 16 2024 at 04:56 |
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|
Floydoid
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 02 2007 Location: Planet Prog Status: Offline Points: 1524 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ Not all (possibly not many) prog lyrics would stand alone as good poetry, and conversely, much good poetry would struggle to be set to music in the form of a song. Poetry and lyrics are similar but distinct written word forms tho there is a certain amount of crossover.
|
|
'We're going to need a bigger swear jar.'
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi, Agreed ... although I think poetry has more weigh since the word has to stand up "by itself" ... as opposed to the lyrics, that are relying on some music behind to carry it, and then there is the suggestion that the music itself is a good backing for the lyrics ... many times it isn't and we immediately comment on it. There are very few, for me, folks that are really good at illustrating lyrics, and we can almost go back 55 years and watch Mick Jagger in the film "Performance" give us the first MTV piece ... and show us how to make some lyrics stand up and then some ... I find it a really big stretch on a lot of bands these days, trying to do something as good, or as well defined ... the main issue being that rock folks hate "directors" and think they are better actors than the hackers in your local theater! And I'm not sure of many of these folks ... as my feeling is that the band would likely be getting more attention, if it were better defined and worked, although that is hearsay, and might not be valid. But, in general, bands that define these things to a really good detail, are eventually found and heard. It might take a few years as we have found with some old psychedelic stuff ... but the Internet is good at making sure that we all know it exists, heard or not. Watch the film "Neruda" and listen to the words ... or even Ginsburg in "Tonight We All Love in London" ... where, reading his stuff doesn't click with me, but hearing him? Wow ... that is good! There aren't many rock singers that can even come close to that quality ... because a lot of the words themselves are not as important as the band, or the song itself, which has the famous riff, etc, etc, etc. And, in many ways this was the art in Led Zeppelin that helped them a lot ... it was very theatrical for some time and RP made sure that it was understood, though many men don't like it because it is so sexy for a lot of women. But, for RP, it was very real, and not fake, and this is a massive difference. Compare this to BD, with YES, when I saw them one of the the last tours by Chris Squire and BD was totally out of it, did not know or understand the lyrics and was using 1000 year old had gestures to make it look like all he sang had meaning ... I can't believe that YES even allowed something like that to take place. It was a real shame to see that. I kinda thought at that point that Jon's words were just really poor ... and while some of them are not great, he is way better than seeing this ... at least he knows what he means and sings like it! Kinda reminds me of the mid 60's with Sgt Pepper's that all of a sudden got a bunch of copy kat bands ... doing fun things ... but I'm not sure that we will confuse Winchester Cathedral with poor, or good lyrics! I don't think that there are "worst" lyricists per se, since so much of it is blended into that band's specific work which makes it harder to say something about it ... and then we have Francesco (Banco) singing, and we don't even know if the lyrics are good or bad, but it sure sounds good. The same for Francis Decamps in Ange ... but at least, by the attitude and feeling around it, that the lyrics are important ... and specially so, in France, where the wording had been a major issue in theater, and then their music. It has to have that incredible depth of feeling and emotion or it was considered crap.
Edited by moshkito - November 18 2024 at 20:20 |
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |