Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Nature and Organisation for Prog Folk
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Nature and Organisation for Prog Folk

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Gordy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Folk/Eclectic/PSIKE/Metal/Post/Math Team

Joined: January 25 2007
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 4246
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gordy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 30 2021 at 12:13
Thanks Ian and Mike for the heads up - Eclectic makes more and more sense to me. I haven't seen N&O pop up on the Progfreak PSIKE charts yet, but I really doubt they'll stand a chance there - they aren't psychedelic or krautrock, and their forays into PE (via the early industrial experiments and the more sleekly-produced modern post-rock stuff) will be too weak to convince the electronic team to accept them. I still believe their destiny lies in Eclectic or Prog Folk.
Back to Top
Gordy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Folk/Eclectic/PSIKE/Metal/Post/Math Team

Joined: January 25 2007
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 4246
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gordy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 13 2022 at 06:14
Would the Eclectic team like to take them to a vote? 
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Online
Points: 9045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2022 at 21:27
I've pinged eclectic to have a look as it doesn't seem to have been discussed there
Back to Top
Gordy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Folk/Eclectic/PSIKE/Metal/Post/Math Team

Joined: January 25 2007
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 4246
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gordy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 01:53
Thank you kindly. I know Mike (TCat) has retired from the Prog Metal team; I take it he's no longer with Eclectic either?
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Online
Points: 9045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 10:33
I don't know honestly.  His title still links him to those subgenre groups.
It's really the "Beauty" album that might qualify them for PA, and prog folk at that.  I don't see the other stuff as being prog - just industrial IMO
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 11:10
Mira is now on the Eclectic team having replaced TC. We are discussing them within the team.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36806
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 11:34
To me based on Beauty Reaps the Blood of Solitude, and with Current 93 included in Prog Folk, Prog Folk would be the obvious place for this Neofolk post-industrial music... When thinking of best category, I would compare like-to-like and this is Current 93 related both in terms of personnel and music qualities.



^ to list one of my favourites in that musical universe (in a very similar vein to music on C93's Thunder Perfect Mind and Of Ruine or Some Blazing Starre...)

I am a bit surprised that if it were to be in PA, Prog Folk was not considered to be the obvious place (I haven't heard the next album, and maybe that's why).

And I love this:


Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 11:51
The Folk team did not vote to accept them, they voted move.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36806
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 11:59
^ I knew the history, I've read through the thread. I had meant to respond to this topic when it was quite new as I'm into Current 93 and related.

As was written last year:

Originally posted by kenethlevine kenethlevine wrote:

I'm going to send to Avant.  If that fails, maybe experimental?  If that fails, I say they should be in PF


And earlier today:

Originally posted by kenethlevine kenethlevine wrote:

I don't know honestly.  His title still links him to those subgenre groups.
It's really the "Beauty" album that might qualify them for PA, and prog folk at that.  I don't see the other stuff as being prog - just industrial IMO


If it finds itself in Eclectic or anywhere, I wouldn't complain. I also think you could compare this somewhat with an act like Swans, but we all make our own associations.

By the way, I started writing my post before you posted (multi tasking), so I hadn't seen your latest yet, Ian, when I posted my last message. So I was following the discussion from Ken's latest post rather than yours.

My point was simply that to me Prog Folk seems the most obvious place due to the Current 93 connection (same with Nick earlier), and musically based on Beauty Reaps the Blood of Solitude, but others see things differently. Vive la difference.

Edited by Logan - February 01 2022 at 12:15
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 12:14
^ Yeah, I really don’t understand how this is not in PA under prog folk - but there have always been strange decisions made in PA. Ours not to question why, ours but to do and die…. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36806
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 12:33
^ To borrow from another thread, Nature and Organisation is more Current 93 and Folk and than current Yes is real Yes. ;) I don't know that actually, but the ping-ponging does surprise me. I do hope the people evaluating it do take into consideration Current 93 (maybe check out some of the music from around the years that Beauty Reaps the Blood of Solitude came out such as the albums I listed before). As a team member I had hoped to be quite familiar with the most relevant material to the suggestion that was already in PA so to make good comparisons. Sometimes I found we had disagreements because we were associating differently, and maybe what I was comparing it to another did not know, and sometimes because we were more focused on different materials by the proposed act as well as different materials that we were comparing it to. It's a reason why discussing and sharing ideas (and sharing relevant music) rather than just sharing final votes (results) can be so valuable. I value a variety of perspectives and taking different ideas into account.
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Online
Points: 9045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 12:40
I think that 1983 album was what threw me, but I had voted yes.  We don't have a tiebreaker anymore because Bob hasn't been active for a few years.  I'd love to have a preferably younger person to join prog folk to give the team 3 active people again as I think fewer proposed entries would stall
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36806
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 12:56
^ I proposed before that perhaps we should have floaters, meaning nothing distasteful, but rather people who are not official team members yet are called on to give a vote when needed. Sort of like a collab reserve or auxiliary force. My life is complicated now, and having to deal with some tough family matters, but I have offered my services in the past as a tie-breaker (for categories I know well and really like much music from). Often evaluations have stalled due to personnel issues. A lot have burnt out on various teams as this voluntary work can be very onerous at times.

Edited by Logan - February 01 2022 at 12:56
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 01 2022 at 13:05
^ I would happily be a floater, I’d such a thing ever came about. It’s a good idea. 👍🏻
Back to Top
Gordy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Folk/Eclectic/PSIKE/Metal/Post/Math Team

Joined: January 25 2007
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 4246
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gordy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2022 at 01:26
Hi, relatively young person here, would also like to volunteer for floaterdom. LOL

I'm finally caught up with the new posts and glad to see an active, vibrant discussion. The ping-ponging between teams has honestly been confusing as I thought they were fairly clear-cut, but if Eclectic doesn't pan out I can't see a more perfect fit than Prog Folk. In a separate thread Ken mentioned he and Hugues will discuss them again if Eclectic decides to move them.
Back to Top
Mirakaze View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Eclectic, JRF/Canterbury, Avant/Zeuhl

Joined: December 17 2019
Location: (redacted)
Status: Offline
Points: 4194
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mirakaze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2022 at 04:03
The eclectic team has rejected them, with most members being of the opinion that if N&O belongs anywhere on the site it should be with prog folk, and if the folk team won't accept it then it has no place on this site. In my personal view, this project borders on too many different subgenres to comfortably sit in one of them specifically but at the same time isn't quite "progressive" enough to be considered eclectic prog. I obviously won't protest if the prog folk team wants to reconsider their decision, although I'm not sure if the rules allow that, strictly speaking.
Back to Top
Gordy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Folk/Eclectic/PSIKE/Metal/Post/Math Team

Joined: January 25 2007
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 4246
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gordy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2022 at 06:27
Thanks for the heads up and for elaborating. I don't believe anything was finalised on the Prog Folk team, as Ken left the door open for N&O's further evaluation, so I'll change the topic heading and see what comes of it.
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Online
Points: 9045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 09:06
I've asked Hugues to reevaluate
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 09:50
Originally posted by kenethlevine kenethlevine wrote:

I've asked Hugues to reevaluate

Is it worth his reading all the comments in this thread, if he has not already? It perhaps gives more context as to why Prog Folk seems the obvious fit so for many of us? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Online
Points: 20390
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 11:10
Originally posted by TCat TCat wrote:

I have to say that I agree with nick and Gordy that N&O belong somewhere among the genres of ProgArchives, and I also understand the confusion and doubt of some members whether it belongs here.  I'm not sure where it would end up in the whole scheme of things, but it does need to be evaluated.  Having listened to a lot of Current 93 material, there are several place that project could go, but it ended up in Progressive Folk and fits there probably better than anywhere else, mainly because of the subject matter more than the style.  N&O would fit right there in that same pocket.  Both projects definitely experiment with music styles, but seem to be rooted more in the Progressive Folk subsection more than anywhere else.  

If the Prog Folk team doesn't want to take it, I say maybe I should submit it to Eclectic first and see where it goes from there.  What does everyone else think?


Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

This is undoubtedly one of the problems with PA, as because the collaborators change over time, there ends up with a lack of consistency not just over whether or not something is considered prog “enough” for the site, but where it fits in the site.

There is no doubt in my mind that N&O belongs in the same genre as Current 93. So if N&O are not prog folk, how do the present prog folk collaborators feel about Current 93? Would they have made it into prof folk? These questions are somewhat rhetorical, because not only are there not necessarily easy answers, but they are also somewhat irrelevant.

When it comes down it, so long as a band is prog “enough” for inclusion in PA, I don’t think the genre is necessarily that important. There are numerous bands and artists in PA whose genre is, at best, questionable.

....

I can definitely understand why Gordy has put N&O up for prog folk; and I can also understand Hugues having reservations. Ultimately, so long as N&O are included in PA, it becomes a moot point. But in the meantime, they need to be evaluated by a team. It’s “complicated” submissions like this that make me wish that more collaborator discussions took place in these submission posts (which, as Greg pointed out in another post like this, used to be the norm). Unfortunately it seems a lot of collaborators “ignore” submissions until they formally come to the team for evaluation. I don’t think this is done out of laziness, so much as this is just now seen as the standard way of doing things. The previous, more public, way of discussing submissions before they were taken away by one team for evaluation definitely does have advantages, in my opinion.
 


I guess it comes down o if X is in XYZprog and then why shouldn't Y be?

Yes both projects belong somewhere on PA, C93 having some "folk" contents, but IMHO, not the biggest part of it. TBH, I really would like to get rid of Current 93 to another genre. Yes, sure it's got folk elements - whereas N&O haven't got any at all, IMHO.

As for Cashmore and his multiple solo/project mixture, it's quite confusing. the are two N&O album, plus an archive album. We could look into Cashmore as an entry in itself, but based on the two N&O albums (declared as such), I don't see this N&O project as PF if you consider music alone.



let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.225 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.