Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - H to He, Who Am the Only One
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedH to He, Who Am the Only One

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Yanns View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 999
Direct Link To This Post Topic: H to He, Who Am the Only One
    Posted: June 16 2005 at 23:02
Somebody tell me, are those the correct time lengths on this website for this album by VDGG? An album from 1970 can't hold that on an album, let alone the fact that The Emperor in his War-Room would have to be on both sides of the album.
Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2005 at 23:14
Someone has mixed the track length up with "A Plague Of Light House Keepers" from the "Pawn Hearts" album, apparently. The correct length of "The Emperor In His War-Room" is 8:15.
Back to Top
nousommedusolei View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 233
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2005 at 00:08
Yes, it sort of made me angry when I bought it, expecting a 23+ minute song and then finding out that that it's about 8 minutes. Still a great song, though. Hooray for Fripp!
I don't believe in demons
I don't believe in devils
I only believe in you
Back to Top
con safo View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2005 at 01:30
Originally posted by nousommedusolei nousommedusolei wrote:

Yes, it sort of made me angry when I bought it, expecting a 23+ minute song and then finding out that that it's about 8 minutes. Still a great song, though. Hooray for Fripp!

Yea
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2005 at 13:49

Originally posted by nousommedusolei nousommedusolei wrote:

Yes, it sort of made me angry when I bought it, expecting a 23+ minute song and then finding out that that it's about 8 minutes. Still a great song, though. Hooray for Fripp!

hooray for Banton/Jackson/Evans/Smith!

Excellent track on and equally excellent album.  possibly my favorite of 1970.

Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2005 at 14:13
Originally posted by NetsNJFan NetsNJFan wrote:

Originally posted by nousommedusolei nousommedusolei wrote:

Yes, it sort of made me angry when I bought it, expecting a 23+ minute song and then finding out that that it's about 8 minutes. Still a great song, though. Hooray for Fripp!

hooray for Banton/Jackson/Evans/Smith!

Excellent track on and equally excellent album.  possibly my favorite of 1970.

When you consider where VdGG were compared to the other greats it seems to me that they were WAY ahead of the game IMO. It makes me sad of the fact of those 3 years that were lost...72-74....ah....if if's and buts were candy and nuts......sigh.

Back to Top
Yanns View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 999
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2005 at 14:21
OK, thanks guys.
Back to Top
con safo View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 14:10
Does anybody have a misprint on their cd case? Mine says that Emperor is 9:04, but its only about 8:15. I just noticed this a few days ago.

Edited by con safo
Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:20

Mine says 9:04 as well (this is the old edition, not the remaster)

Back to Top
Duncan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 23 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:27
It's on my copy of the remaster, too
Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:32
strange... 
Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:45
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

When you consider where VdGG were compared to the other greats it seems to me that they were WAY ahead of the game IMO. It makes me sad of the fact of those 3 years that were lost...72-74....ah....if if's and buts were candy and nuts......sigh.



Yeah, i thought that too .... the only album of comparable "progresiveness" at that time was ITCOTCK (and In the Wake of Poseidon)

 
Back to Top
beterdedthnred4 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:51
I disagree that 72-74 were lost years.  Peter Hammill was putting out VDGG albums under his own name the whole time.  I especially like Over
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 15:57
Originally posted by BebieM BebieM wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

When you consider where VdGG were compared to the other greats it seems to me that they were WAY ahead of the game IMO. It makes me sad of the fact of those 3 years that were lost...72-74....ah....if if's and buts were candy and nuts......sigh.



Yeah, i thought that too .... the only album of comparable "progresiveness" at that time was ITCOTCK (and In the Wake of Poseidon)

 

Trespass (1970) was pretty proggy too.

A lot of the Canterbury bands were prog as well around 1969-1970 in their own canterbury way.

Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 16:17
Originally posted by NetsNJFan NetsNJFan wrote:

Originally posted by BebieM BebieM wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

When you consider where VdGG were compared to the other greats it seems to me that they were WAY ahead of the game IMO. It makes me sad of the fact of those 3 years that were lost...72-74....ah....if if's and buts were candy and nuts......sigh.



Yeah, i thought that too .... the only album of comparable "progresiveness" at that time was ITCOTCK (and In the Wake of Poseidon)

 

Trespass (1970) was pretty proggy too.

A lot of the Canterbury bands were prog as well around 1969-1970 in their own canterbury way.

Tresspass is a solid lp...but as far as ahead of it's time compared to H to He...

H to He is lightyears ahead

Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 16:21

Originally posted by beterdedthnred4 beterdedthnred4 wrote:

I disagree that 72-74 were lost years.  Peter Hammill was putting out VDGG albums under his own name the whole time.  I especially like Over

Hammill did some excellent stuff in 73-74...no doubt...as far as 72 went I think he just basically sat on his ass that year. Chameleon in the Shadow of Night and Silent Corner and the Empty Stage are fantastic SOLO lps. Aside from a few tunes, most do not have that VdGG sound whatsoever. I never thought much of In Camera.

PS: Over was in 77' and sounds nothing like a VdGG lp.

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 17:18

I have a CD with recordings from the lost period

P.S. Strange that you don't like In Camera

Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10261
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 17:20

Originally posted by beterdedthnred4 beterdedthnred4 wrote:

I disagree that 72-74 were lost years.  Peter Hammill was putting out VDGG albums under his own name the whole time.  I especially like Over

Only "Over" is from 1976.



BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Salmacis72 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: June 19 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 18:03

VERY strange not to like In Camera, I agree. With the small exception of "Magog", that album is a 10/10.

[useless trivia]H To He Who Am The Only One was the first album Bruce Dickinson ever bought.[/useless trivia]

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 18:18
Then Bruce Bruce had exellent taste in music!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.189 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.