Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Phil Collins solo material
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPhil Collins solo material

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Poll Question: Do you like the solo material by Phil Collins?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [9.09%]
5 [15.15%]
20 [60.61%]
0 [0.00%]
3 [9.09%]
1 [3.03%]
1 [3.03%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 43619
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2018 at 05:51
^ my problem with all the songs you mentioned is that they were overplayed, on radio and TV. 
There was his come back single on his Testify album - Can't Stop Loving You, not a bad song IMO, but OMG, I could not escape this song back when it was released. It got annoying really fast. 
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 51030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2018 at 06:31
It's been so long since I've listened to any of his solo stuff, but a couple interesting ones were:

Tomorrow Never Knows (a Beatles cover)
I Don't Care Anymore
Do You Know, Do You Care?
Thru These Walls
Inside Out
Colours
I Wish It Would Rain Down (with Clapton)

It always seemed like he needed more chords or the Tony Banks treatment or something. But I think he intentionally wanted them simple. For the kind of drummer he was, I'm surprised he didn't showcase his skills in that department much in his solo stuff, especially with the over-usage of drum machines. Was he really that busy that he couldn't lay down a decent drum track? It also seemed he was more interested in personal stuff, ranging from sappy, syrupy things to songs about his divorces.

For what it's worth, Banks' and Rutherford's non-Genesis 1980s stuff are just as flawed. They both had OK debut solo albums. Maybe Phil should have made one back in the 1970s?
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2018 at 16:23
I clicked YES.....too many other choices. Could have gone with the Most option too, but I quite like Phil Collins, I think he is a very good to excellent writer and musician.

He's really smart behind the mixing board too, great producer.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 06:44
Excluding some Brand X stuff, no I don't like his solo stuff. In the Air Tonight and I missed again are the only songs I can tolerate. I've heard maybe five of his albums.

White middle class men in polyester suits murdering Motown classics is not good form at all, by any measure.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Jeffro View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2163
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 07:30
Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

^ my problem with all the songs you mentioned is that they were overplayed, on radio and TV. 
 

No question and I certainly haven't heard deeper tracks on those albums. I suppose I should check some of them out to see if there is any bits of 70s Phil in any of those songs



We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.

My face IS a maserati
Back to Top
Argo2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2017
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 4462
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 08:41
The first two solo albums had some good stuff , especially the first one. It got real poppy after that.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 10:02
Originally posted by Argo2112 Argo2112 wrote:

The first two solo albums had some good stuff , especially the first one. It got real poppy after that.

What does "poppy" have to do with it? The Beatles were all "poppy" and the #1 girl band on the face of the planet, you guys hold them to the highest esteem, so I know you guys like "poppy".
LOLLOL
Back to Top
Jeffro View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2163
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 10:22
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Argo2112 Argo2112 wrote:

The first two solo albums had some good stuff , especially the first one. It got real poppy after that.

What does "poppy" have to do with it? The Beatles were all "poppy" and the #1 girl band on the face of the planet, you guys hold them to the highest esteem, so I know you guys like "poppy".
LOLLOL

Maybe because the Beatles were like that from the beginning. They never pretended to be anything else. Even when they got experimental, it was still poppy. With Phil, he started out as prog, sprinkled in some jazz, and then went full on pop. It smells of sellout, depending of who you ask.
Now, does that mean that the music sucks? Was he really a sellout? That's a matter of opinion.

I cut my teeth on Abacab and later Genesis so I don't get all indignant about Genesis no longer being hardcore prog after about 1980. However, Phil's solo stuff, especially what came later is not at all to my tastes. Again, it shocks me that a guy who could be in Genesis in the 70s and Brand X could write pop tripe like Against All Odds and Sussudio Confused


Edited by Jeffro - February 27 2018 at 10:24
We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.

My face IS a maserati
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30850
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 12:26
Yep...on the radio. Own his first two and never listen to them at home.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 12:32
^ Probably because prog does not pay, unless your Rush. Later Genesis (post PG) gave them fame, hit records and money. Phil's solo career made him a millionaire.....I have zero issue with this and don't consider it a "sell-out".
At the core all these 60-70s musicians are pop music lovers, growing up listening to R&B, soul and American pop as well as local pop music. Prog was experimental for them, but it did not pay......Remember even in the mid 70's when Genesis was very popular, their last scheduled Lamb live show was cancelled due to no ticket sales. This was to be the last show with Gabriel, and it did not happen. It was then they realized the last show had already happened with Gabriel, so it was kinda like a dry hump.....
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18267
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2018 at 14:01
^Low ticket sales. I'm sure some people bought tickets for that show but not enough. ;)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.