Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Your top most pretentious prog bands?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedYour top most pretentious prog bands?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8631 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 18:42
^Really? A message is pretentious?  Not everyone can be a lawyer or promote change with huge infusions of cash. 

Again, this word is slung around like it exists anywhere but complete abstraction.

Bandcamp
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15352 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 19:26
pretentious

 

Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Wikipedia.

pre·ten·tious

  (prĭ-tĕn′shəs)
adj.
1. Claiming that or behaving as if one is important or deserving of merit when such is not the case: a pretentioussocialite.
2. Showing or betraying an attitude of superiority: made pretentious remarks about his education.
3. Marked by an extravagant or presumptuous outward show; ostentatious: a pretentious house.




Really? Are bands that are just more able to present musical expressions that you can not yet understand ---- pretentious? Or are you just jealous that you don't get it because you don't want to advance to the levels of getting it? 

These and other questions haunt our psychological realities day to day but no answers truly satisfy until we do the homework to understand how advanced Calculus was derived from Algebra in the first place. I guess we should call of of creation pretentious? I mean, you don't understand it totally so why not?

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8631 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 22:46
^Fantastic! 

Except you dropped this. 

Bandcamp
Back to Top
Thatfabulousalien View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2016
Location: Aussie/NZ
Status: Offline
Points: 1409 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 23:07
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

^Really? A message is pretentious?  Not everyone can be a lawyer or promote change with huge infusions of cash. 

Again, this word is slung around like it exists anywhere but complete abstraction.

No, a message infused with a huge ego and self-importance to that message. 

Otherwise, as I see it. Music is music, good and bad. Entirely up to subjective debate. 
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.

https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8631 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2017 at 23:34
^Fair enough. 
But you REALLY don't like Bono, do you?

I don't even like U2, but I just don't think he's as much of an attention whore as all that. But no biggy. I don't like Roger Waters.

Bandcamp
Back to Top
Son.of.Tiresias View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 23 2014
Location: Northern Hemisp
Status: Offline
Points: 441 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 02:36
In this context the word pretentious is totally wrong, of course.

For me itīs dull.  
Without Keith Emerson and Rick Wakeman progressive music would have been still quite dull back in the day. They were geniuses, they created something new. No wonder critics hated them. Damn commies LOL




Edited by Son.of.Tiresias - February 10 2017 at 02:57
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Back to Top
Son.of.Tiresias View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 23 2014
Location: Northern Hemisp
Status: Offline
Points: 441 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 02:54
Originally posted by Cosmiclawnmower Cosmiclawnmower wrote:

Ive always believed that music is created in the cosmos and is only channelled through humans therefore it is impossible for music to be pretentious.. even if, on occasion, the people who make it might beWink

Quite rightly so, dear Watcher of the Skies. And I would add that the people who listen to it as well. 
Silly human, silly human race, isnīt it ?
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 03:09
Originally posted by Mascodagama Mascodagama wrote:

Evidently there are very different understandings of what constitutes pretentiousness being employed by different posters. My own personal one is that pretentiousness is about pretence - specifically, pretending to operate on some kind of artistic or intellectual level that is not actually earned or achieved. e.g. Jon Anderson's Yes lyrics were frequently pretentious as they aspired to the status of poetry / philosophy without having any actual substance. Peter Hamill's lyrics with VdGG weren't pretentious because, although they had obvious literary and intellectual aspirations, Hamill had the substance to back it up - an actual poet not a pretend one.

Just passing through...but this one sums it up perfectly.
Anderson is a pretentious ex-milkman from Accrington, while Hammill is a towering genius.
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
Son.of.Tiresias View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 23 2014
Location: Northern Hemisp
Status: Offline
Points: 441 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 03:44
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

Originally posted by Mascodagama Mascodagama wrote:

Evidently there are very different understandings of what constitutes pretentiousness being employed by different posters. My own personal one is that pretentiousness is about pretence - specifically, pretending to operate on some kind of artistic or intellectual level that is not actually earned or achieved. e.g. Jon Anderson's Yes lyrics were frequently pretentious as they aspired to the status of poetry / philosophy without having any actual substance. Peter Hamill's lyrics with VdGG weren't pretentious because, although they had obvious literary and intellectual aspirations, Hamill had the substance to back it up - an actual poet not a pretend one.

Just passing through...but this one sums it up perfectly.
Anderson is a pretentious ex-milkman from Accrington, while Hammill is a towering genius.

Or maybe you just envy Jonīs gorgeous hair. Passing thru. Great. Go and get a life.
Damn commies, didnīt I tell... LOL
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 15216 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 04:32
Of course proggies could give the word some kind of positive ironic spin. "Now ELP are really badly pretentious, so cool!"
By the way, I think there was a pretentious element to most of what Eloy's Frank Bornemann did (I tend to suspect that if he calls an album "Visionary" it's really about himself), but then he managed to get some positive creative energy out of it, so fine by me. (And I'm able to ignore lyrics when listening to music... good for me!) 


Edited by Lewian - February 10 2017 at 04:33
Back to Top
hellogoodbye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP member

Joined: August 29 2011
Location: Troy
Status: Offline
Points: 7251 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 05:08
Everyone, probably. To confront with Bach, Bartok and Cage is pretentious, but it's also risky. It is that risk taking which sometimes makes prog so interesting. 
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8780 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2017 at 05:40
These guys aren't pretentious, under-rated as hell, but not pretentious.
Back to Top
Arnulf Floyd View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2017
Location: Transylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 78 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2017 at 06:06
1: King Crimson
2: Pink Floyd
3: Emerson, Lake and Palmer
4: Yes
5: Genesis
Long Live Rock 'n' Roll
Back to Top
Thatfabulousalien View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2016
Location: Aussie/NZ
Status: Offline
Points: 1409 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2017 at 06:23
Have any prog bands created societies to take over the planet yet?? 
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.

https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.