Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Who is your favourite revolutionary?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWho is your favourite revolutionary?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2021222324>
Poll Question: Who is your favourite revolutionary?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [8.33%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [5.56%]
3 [8.33%]
0 [0.00%]
1 [2.78%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [5.56%]
1 [2.78%]
1 [2.78%]
0 [0.00%]
17 [47.22%]
6 [16.67%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:00
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

Nothing says revolutionary like abandoning your own family and country to collect welfare somewhere else
And your proof of this is?

The United Nations Refugee Agency reported last week there were 72 per cent men, 13 per cent women, and just 15 per cent children making the trip to Europe. This was out of a total of 381,412 people, meaning that 274,616 of those making the trip were men, with just 49,583 women, and  57,211 children.
Updated numbers now show 69% men, though these numbers of course suffer from the problem I mention below - they are based on accepted asylum-seekers, not total migrants. 

Eurostat report showed 75% of migrants are male, 80% under 35 years old.

Of the migrants living in the tent city in Dresden, for instance (erected over a bulldozed city park, btw), 79.3-per-cent are men, 12.4-per-cent are women, and 8.3-per-cent are children.

Eurostat reports only 1/5 migrants are from Syria - i.e. most are not refugees.  The UN numbers are intentionally misleading (as mentioned above), they only give demographics for people accepted for asylum (which are 54% Syrians).

Top 5 nationalities crossing Mediterranean into Europe

German authorities report that most asylum seekers claim to be from Syria, but many of those are not.  Same with Greece and Serbia.

Harder to find specific welfare & govt assistance statistics because leftist governments would rather keep it hushed up, but here are some from the Netherlands by country of origin.  In Sweden the 15.1% made up by immigrants make up 60.5% of the entire welfare costs for the nation, according to statistics published by The Swedish Social Insurance Agency and The National Board of Health and Welfare (sorry lost the link, should be google-able)

Migrants leave Denmark in favour of Sweden, because the former "doesn't give them enough benefits"
 (2)

Migrants consider Austria and Hungary unsuitable because they don't get free food, education, and houses like in Germany

Many migrants drawn by welfare in Northern Europe

After 10 years, only 60% of immigrants to Sweden are employed.  The corresponding figure for native-born Swedes is 85%.






Edited by Triceratopsoil - September 23 2015 at 16:26
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:10
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

[QUOTE=Svetonio]
 
 
 
 
 
 
My comment is that Republic of Serbia (and whole west Balkan) is ready fornew socialism, of course with new politicians on the scene.
 
 
It's hard to believe that any sane person living in the 21st century could say something so idiotic.
 
 
[QUOTE]Almost half of the US population - 49 percent - regards the government as a threat to their lives and liberty, according to a new Gallup poll. Distrust in the federal government has been on the rise since 2006, when it stood at 46 percent.

The poll was conducted between September 9 and September 13, and included an open-ended question whether the US government was an “immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens.” Two in three Republicans and one in three Democrats answered yes, Gallup noted.

 

 
Ah, one not need to be Henry Kissinger to clearly see from above text that the claustrophobia in the U.S. is growing LOL
Although, who encourages that claustrophobia, I'm just curious? The Republicans? Democrats? Unidentified groups of similarly thinking people who have an unlimited budget to lobby?
Who are you kidding? Stripped of an image, you would have no opinion on any world event. Only children are concerned with images instead of text because they simply can't read the text or it's difficult for them to understand the text which is too advanced for their tiny brains. Which deficiency applies to you?
Back to Top
twseel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2012
Location: abroad
Status: Offline
Points: 22767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:22
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:


Harder to find specific welfare & govt assistance statistics because leftist governments would rather keep it hushed up, but here are some from the Netherlands by country of origin.  In Sweden the 15.1% made up by immigrants make up 60.5% of the entire welfare costs for the nation, according to statistics published by The Swedish Social Insurance Agency and The National Board of Health and Welfare (sorry lost the link, should be google-able)

Except that if you look at second generation non-western immigrants in the NL, they actually receive less welfare than the average 'original'(can't think of the proper word right now) Dutchman.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:24
Second generation aren't immigrants, and have nothing to do with the current economic migrant influx
Back to Top
twseel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2012
Location: abroad
Status: Offline
Points: 22767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:29
You may say they're not immigrants but they're at least mostly a direct, evidently positive, consequence of immigrants, your opinion is comparable to getting bags of money smacked into your face before you get to take them home, and you quit because you don't want your face to hurt.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:37
"evidently positive" in what way, exactly?
Back to Top
twseel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2012
Location: abroad
Status: Offline
Points: 22767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:44
In the way that according to the numbers, they very likely do more work than they demand in income from the state, even compared to the average inhabitant, besides the fact that cultural diversity is simply fun and the fact that we have used our wealth to actually improve the world beyond our own borders by helping those who are less fortunate, which satisfies our moral.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 15:53
"Cultural diversity" doesn't exist with mass immigration.  Cultural diversity exists with Nationalism, to be witnessed with travel.  Mass immigration destroys cultures in favour of a bland melting pot.  Oh, but we get ethnic food so that's ok.

If I go to Paris I want to see Paris, not Mogadishu.

Even BBC columnists are backing down from their shameless pro-migrant stance now


Edited by Triceratopsoil - September 23 2015 at 19:24
Back to Top
twseel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2012
Location: abroad
Status: Offline
Points: 22767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 16:04
Well a culture is never pure, it's just a collection of jokes characterizing people from the same social and natural environments, so no egg yolks are being torn open, it's really just one basic drink mixing with another.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 16:24
You can't honestly believe that
Back to Top
twseel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2012
Location: abroad
Status: Offline
Points: 22767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 16:36
Oh, well if you say so...
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:10
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

 
 

The black man with his raised closed hand has nothing to do with fascism; this sign relates to the Afro-American struggle during the 1960s and indicates solidarity of movement, not a Hitler salute or a satire of one.   In fact the photo may be completely misleading, as it appears the man is saluting the soldiers in support.  Either way, you're applying Euro-trash politics to the US--  doesn't work.




Edited by Atavachron - September 23 2015 at 18:14
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
emigre80 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:17

A number of points: young men are probably the most mobile, therefore the most likely to try and immigrate beyond the borders of the countries they are fleeing (trying the same trip with small children is very much more difficult). I haven't seen the figures myself, but it is not surprising if most of the migrants are male and under 35%.

Also not surprising that many of them are economic refugees as well as political ones. I seem to recall that many people emigrated from Europe to America and Canada for precisely those reasons.
 
As for dependence on welfare, the figures you cite are short term and are usually the support required to set migrants up in housing, job and language training, etc.  The vast majority of migrants do not want to move to places where they can live on welfare (which if you have ever tried it ain't much of a life at all - I speak as someone whose family subsisted on welfare for a period when I was young) but rather where they can attain better lives.  To imply that immigrants mostly want to come and "live off" the system is certainly xenophobic.
 
Most importantly, western countries are willing to take migrants in (except for the southern European countries, which are being flooded by economic migrants at the moment - and economic migrants can be just as desperate as political ones, not to mention that economic immigration has been SOP for many centuries now).  They are not taking in those migrants purely from altruism, but because they recognize that immigration has benefits for the host countries.  Cultural diversity, population reinforcement, the migrants' willingness to take jobs that the native inhabitants are reluctant to, etc.
 
Your suggestion that "Mass immigration destroys cultures in favour of a bland melting pot" is belied by the experience of America and Canada, which are populated almost exclusively by mass immigration and are in fact complex societies that no one could call "bland."
 
Your arguments do reveal rather blatant xenophobia. So I'm wondering, how many generations back did your family emigrate to Canada?
Back to Top
Pastmaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 23 2015
Location: Spiderwood Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 1774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:29
EDIT: Deleted my post, as I realized that I don't want to get into a political debate.




Edited by Pastmaster - September 24 2015 at 00:08
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:30
10 generations.  My Scottish side has been here longer than Canada was a nation.

"Xenophobia" is a leftist canard to shut down discussion. Tribalism is natural behavior that has deep roots in evolutionary psychology; it is only not allowed if you live in a first-world country, apparently
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:33
What impact do you think millions of muslim and catholic imports from 3rd-world nations will have on western values like, for instance, freedom of speech & women's rights?
Back to Top
emigre80 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:51
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

10 generations.  My Scottish side has been here longer than Canada was a nation.

"Xenophobia" is a leftist canard to shut down discussion. Tribalism is natural behavior that has deep roots in evolutionary psychology; it is only not allowed if you live in a first-world country, apparently.
 
So economic migration is okay as long as it happened over 200 years ago?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:53
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

Whilst our glorious leaders stick their genitalia into deceased animals there is a world in crisis out there.

Great post

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
emigre80 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 18:55
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

What impact do you think millions of muslim and catholic imports from 3rd-world nations will have on western values like, for instance, freedom of speech & women's rights?
 
The values that I'm concerned about are those of people who  want to live in a "tribal" community composed only of people who look and behave exactly as they look and behave.
 
Freedom of speech isn't worth much if everyone is saying exactly the same thing.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2015 at 19:10
Where did I say that?  Fact of the matter is that not all cultures are compatible.  Another fact of the matter is that the neocons & globalists don't want any culture to remain, that's why they exclusively push immigration from incompatible nations.  Nobody is complaining about immigrants from England, France, or Germany, because they share common values.  By contrast, how much Swedish culture do you think there still is in Malmo?

Originally posted by emigre80 emigre80 wrote:

Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

10 generations.  My Scottish side has been here longer than Canada was a nation.

"Xenophobia" is a leftist canard to shut down discussion. Tribalism is natural behavior that has deep roots in evolutionary psychology; it is only not allowed if you live in a first-world country, apparently.
 
So economic migration is okay as long as it happened over 200 years ago?


If you can't tell the difference between building a nation, and collecting it's social benefits centuries later, you are beyond help.


But I'll leave this thread now, I can tell you are tired of plugging your ears and going lalalala.  Peace.


Edited by Triceratopsoil - September 23 2015 at 19:12
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2021222324>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.256 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.