Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
|
Post Reply 
|
Page 123 14> |
| Author | |
Chris S 
Special Collaborator 
Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 09 2004 Location: Front Range Status: Offline Points: 7028 |
 Topic: CensorshipPosted: October 10 2013 at 02:10 |
Roger Waters - The Pros and Cons of Hitch-hiking cover has been censured.....Well, well, well I thought the old apartheid regime had long died but apparently not. " They sell Pepsi in the Andes.....it's a miracle" It is all about advertising revenue folks, how low or high will you go?
|
|
|
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR] |
|
 |
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 02:38 |
|
We're working on it Chris. I would like to say: "well, at least they've not put fig-leaves on bronze statues".... but alas...
  |
|
|
What?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 09 2004 Location: Front Range Status: Offline Points: 7028 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 02:43 |
and now check at Roxy Music's Country Life   how rediculousEdited by Chris S - October 10 2013 at 02:51 |
|
|
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 12 2011 Location: Melb, Australia Status: Offline Points: 7951 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 02:58 |
|
Hey, boobies! Just like what girls got!
This is f**king pathetic and ridiculous. Guess we better get that nude video of Andy Latimar swinging naked on a wrecking ball taken down right away too. 
|
|
|
|
|
DamoXt7942
Special Collaborator
Joined: October 15 2008 Location: Okayama, Japan Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:09 |
|
Mmm, controversial issue but we've got cautioned by
 someone.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:10 |
|
if anything, the blurring of Country Life just makes it worse
|
|
|
What?
|
|
|
|
|
DamoXt7942
Special Collaborator
Joined: October 15 2008 Location: Okayama, Japan Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:14 |
|
^ And that MUST notify us something por ... g ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 12 2011 Location: Melb, Australia Status: Offline Points: 7951 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:29 |
Just looked at that myself, it makes them look more nude than ever!
Those wicked girls! 
|
|
|
|
|
Sagichim
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 29 2006 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 6632 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:32 |
|
Max has a lot of work infront of him. Is this happening in MMA as well? I haven't seen this happening in any other site.
I think it's much more offensive bluring someone's art work than presenting it, I mean come on it's not that it is pornography or anything even remotely close. But maybe he should have started with this Outrageous anyway! |
|
|
|
|
someone_else
Forum Senior Member 
VIP Member Joined: May 02 2008 Location: Going Bananas Status: Online Points: 24315 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 03:40 |
|
Has the PMRC been frequenting PA lately?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 09 2004 Location: Front Range Status: Offline Points: 7028 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 04:10 |
|
Amazon.com don't censure their covers. Maybe the owner has a new spiritual path, I cannot see advertorial's being withdrawn as a valid threat either.....
.......out jezebelMaybe the sites gonna be sold to Magic School Bus & Co and needs to be squeaky clean
|
|
|
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 04:41 |
|
The site costs money to run. Visitors to the site currently consume 4TB of data a month - that is a huge bandwidth that has to be paid for. Add to that the cost of the maintenance and storage and leasing.
Unless we charge for usage (yeah, right, like that's gonna work) or find a sponsor (not a good idea) then Google Ads are the only viable way of paying for it. So yes, threat of withdrawal of adverts is very serious and very valid. The violation warning notice Max received from Goolge AdSense is very real. If we lose Google Ads we lose the site - plain as. Personally, I think Google Ads are over reacting and Max is being over-cautious, we need to balance the need for complying with Google's Terms and Conditions and being sensible about it. |
|
|
What?
|
|
|
|
|
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 12 2011 Location: Melb, Australia Status: Offline Points: 7951 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 04:53 |
|
Very fair, Dean.
It's a shame that the Google Adsense can't tell the difference between erotic imagery and outright pornography. Also, I very much doubt that there's many young kids looking into the world of progressive rock that could potentially be offended.
|
|
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 04:59 |
Google's guidelines can be read here: http://adsense.blogspot.ie/2011/08/policy-tips-keeping-network-family-safe.html btw: Max was given 3 days to comply, we are currently on Day 2
|
|
|
What?
|
|
|
|
|
progresssaurus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2012 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 1884 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 05:16 |
|
I'm not sure about possible conflict with the law for cover art modifications. Maybe at least some explanation, that picture of cover not match with original?
Edited by progresssaurus - October 10 2013 at 05:21 |
|
|
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Online Points: 16913 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 05:22 |
  |
|
|
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 09 2004 Location: Front Range Status: Offline Points: 7028 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 05:23 |
|
Sign of the times.....the cyber world continues to dumb down everything and privacy laws get more enforced (Lack of privacy). Return to good old country style living, no smartphones, no Internet, no TV.....just good old communes, free love and sharing of ideas. Google is worse than FB now.....enemies of the state, maximize advertising revenues in cyberspace and put a stranglehold on businesses......Bullets for brains
In South Africa in the 70's we had a magazine called Scope. Yes it was mainly targeted towards the male population and the middle pages had these voluptuous white only ladies with their nipples replaced by stars
Well this is just as ridiculous and if Adsense has no measure of what is good or bad nudity then so be it. We are clearly so insignificant in the broad scheme of things there must be thousands of web owners panicking about falling revenues so lets start censuring reference to sex or drugs in songs too....ban the Beatles and Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds.......come on I dare you.Or is Google purely concerned with the visual impact only? Hypocrisy methinks...they only care about the aspect associated with revenues. |
|
|
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 05:31 |
What you currently see is a quick-fix, Max is working on a better solution.
|
|
|
What?
|
|
|
|
|
someone_else
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member Joined: May 02 2008 Location: Going Bananas Status: Online Points: 24315 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 05:35 |
Hypocrisy indeed. Some of their ads can compete in loathsomeness with the explicit cover artwork on some albums. I do not like most of these covers, blurred or not, but what really bugs me is that these s can impose content modifications on site owners  .Edited by someone_else - October 10 2013 at 06:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
progresssaurus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2012 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 1884 |
Posted: October 10 2013 at 06:31 |
Google's guidelines: "... or provocative poses (even if clothed) that have sexually gratifying overtones. "
(sorry
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 14> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Censorship
Topic Options
Dean wrote:
