Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report abuse here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews reporting thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews reporting thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 197198199200201 285>
Author
Message
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CCVP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 14:08
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:


I've reported this review in the past, but since nothing was done I'm reporting it again. This review, published some short period of time after the album was released, is apparently based on a leak that was around before the album was released, which did not contain the two last songs, had a much darker/rawer mix to it and sounded (just as the reviewer put it) a more aggressive, meaner sound to it.

Moreover, it did not have, as I mentioned, the two last songs: Best of Times and Count of Tuscany; the former has an obvious Rush twist to it and the second sounds very much like the "traditional" Dream Theater. 

The first time I did it was more detailed because I could get my hands on the leak, but it eventually disappeared as the album became available. 

Has this come to any fruition?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 16:19
Originally posted by Battlestations Battlestations wrote:

This one's probably bogus too.

Doesn't seem to be, looks legit to me.
What?
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NotAProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 16:24
Originally posted by Battlestations Battlestations wrote:

This one's probably bogus too.

Why?

I looked at the profile: Marina (nice female name), from Russia, high ratings for some Russian and not only Russian albums. I see no evil.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Battlestations View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 30 2011
Location: Brussels
Status: Offline
Points: 62
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Battlestations Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 16:31
Just odd that there's all these ratings in just one day since the account was created. Seems to be the common MO for rating spammers.
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NotAProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 16:35
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:


I've reported this review in the past, but since nothing was done I'm reporting it again. This review, published some short period of time after the album was released, is apparently based on a leak that was around before the album was released, which did not contain the two last songs, had a much darker/rawer mix to it and sounded (just as the reviewer put it) a more aggressive, meaner sound to it.

Moreover, it did not have, as I mentioned, the two last songs: Best of Times and Count of Tuscany; the former has an obvious Rush twist to it and the second sounds very much like the "traditional" Dream Theater. 

The first time I did it was more detailed because I could get my hands on the leak, but it eventually disappeared as the album became available. 

Has this come to any fruition?
How your arguments could be proved? We don't know whether he listened the album with or without two songs.
And what  fruition you expect? 

IMO nice, humorous review. Much better than yours "Felona e Sorona"Tongue
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NotAProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 16:37
Originally posted by Battlestations Battlestations wrote:

Just odd that there's all these ratings in just one day since the account was created. Seems to be the common MO for rating spammers.
About 20 ratings in total, not that much. My cat heard much more albums.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 17:16
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Originally posted by Battlestations Battlestations wrote:

This one's probably bogus too.

Why?

I looked at the profile: Marina (nice female name), from Russia, high ratings for some Russian and not only Russian albums. I see no evil.
The only problem I see is that she probably hasn't read the definitions of the ratings carefully enough, but she's rating albums she likes (3 stars is her minimum) and it seems she has really listened to them.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NotAProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 18:19
^ With or without reading definitions ratings are more or less the same I guess. Smile
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CCVP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2012 at 19:19
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:


I've reported this review in the past, but since nothing was done I'm reporting it again. This review, published some short period of time after the album was released, is apparently based on a leak that was around before the album was released, which did not contain the two last songs, had a much darker/rawer mix to it and sounded (just as the reviewer put it) a more aggressive, meaner sound to it.

Moreover, it did not have, as I mentioned, the two last songs: Best of Times and Count of Tuscany; the former has an obvious Rush twist to it and the second sounds very much like the "traditional" Dream Theater. 

The first time I did it was more detailed because I could get my hands on the leak, but it eventually disappeared as the album became available. 

Has this come to any fruition?
How your arguments could be proved? We don't know whether he listened the album with or without two songs.
And what  fruition you expect? 

IMO nice, humorous review. Much better than yours "Felona e Sorona"Tongue

Well, I don't have the proof anymore because the file containing the leak, but the review speaks against itself if you listen to the album. He said the album has no Rush influences, for example, but the song The Best of Times are overflowing with them! 

And the fruition would be its deletion. 
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NotAProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 03:26
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 
Well, I don't have the proof anymore because the file containing the leak, but the review speaks against itself if you listen to the album. He said the album has no Rush influences, for example, but the song The Best of Times are overflowing with them! 

And the fruition would be its deletion. 
Perhaps you hear Rush influences but the reviewer does not. Not a reason for killing the beast.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CCVP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 06:59
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 
Well, I don't have the proof anymore because the file containing the leak, but the review speaks against itself if you listen to the album. He said the album has no Rush influences, for example, but the song The Best of Times are overflowing with them! 

And the fruition would be its deletion. 
Perhaps you hear Rush influences but the reviewer does not. Not a reason for killing the beast.

Gd damn it. Unhappy
Back to Top
odinalcatraz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote odinalcatraz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 10:55
The Italians could be back. Ha!
http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=43602
http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=43600
Multiple meaningless sudden ratings from both of them.
They also affected Oceans architecture quite badly.
Interesting to note that Joe and his mum from Oceans Architecture clearly decided not to remove the meaningless rating that his mum gave Corvus Stone tho(even tho he promised here that he would). I find that sad from a 3 star member.
Nevertheless,  they will be happy if you fix the two I just listed.
http://www.corvusstone.com
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 11:17
Originally posted by odinalcatraz odinalcatraz wrote:

The Italians could be back. Ha!
http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=43602
http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=43600
Multiple meaningless sudden ratings from both of them.
They also affected Oceans architecture quite badly.
Interesting to note that Joe and his mum from Oceans Architecture clearly decided not to remove the meaningless rating that his mum gave Corvus Stone tho(even tho he promised here that he would). I find that sad from a 3 star member.
Nevertheless,  they will be happy if you fix the two I just listed.
Sorry Colin, those two are unrelated and not Italian - no foul play, just not necessarily fair play. They stay
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 12:00
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 
Well, I don't have the proof anymore because the file containing the leak, but the review speaks against itself if you listen to the album. He said the album has no Rush influences, for example, but the song The Best of Times are overflowing with them! 

And the fruition would be its deletion. 
Perhaps you hear Rush influences but the reviewer does not. Not a reason for killing the beast.

Gd damn it. Unhappy

The Rush influences are very apparent.
Back to Top
odinalcatraz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote odinalcatraz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 17:13
Smile
SBD has fixed the rating for Corvus Stone. Thank you!!
Sorry that the recent 2star ratings I noticed can't be fixed Joe. I just don't understand why people do that. Still.. people upload music and movies for the world every day. Logic doesn't play any part in life. Dum di dum di dum. They may all be lawn mowers.
http://www.corvusstone.com
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2012 at 23:42
I dont know


this is not really what we should post in a review is it?

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=868747


Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ambient Hurricanes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2012 at 00:10
^I suppose him calling the average rating "offensive" could be construed as making negative comments toward other reviewers, which is prohibited according to the reviewing guidelines.

Otherwise, it just sounded like a terrible review devoid of any good content but also devoid of anything blatantly against the rules.  At least it was concise. 
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2012 at 00:52
^^^ Ture
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Offline
Points: 8952
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2012 at 08:50
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^I suppose him calling the average rating "offensive" could be construed as making negative comments toward other reviewers, which is prohibited according to the reviewing guidelines.

Otherwise, it just sounded like a terrible review devoid of any good content but also devoid of anything blatantly against the rules.  At least it was concise. 

well, he does say the music flits around quite a bit and has no cohesion.  So there is some attempt at explaining himself.  I think it should stay because he doesn't pick on an individual reviewer, but it takes a lot of nerve to come on here, post a first review that degrades a well known and respected album, and then refer to the ratings of others as disgusting.  He may not realize that his review probably didn't move the overall rating of TB by more than 0.01
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CCVP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2012 at 10:03
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 
Well, I don't have the proof anymore because the file containing the leak, but the review speaks against itself if you listen to the album. He said the album has no Rush influences, for example, but the song The Best of Times are overflowing with them! 

And the fruition would be its deletion. 
Perhaps you hear Rush influences but the reviewer does not. Not a reason for killing the beast.

Gd damn it. Unhappy

The Rush influences are very apparent.

Glad that someone who actually listened to the album agrees. Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 197198199200201 285>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.430 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.