Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Poaching - do you think it is ok/fine
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPoaching - do you think it is ok/fine

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>
Poll Question: do you think poaching and hunting of animals is bad
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
19 [82.61%]
4 [17.39%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2012 at 12:34
voted wrong - one more against Poaching - one less think its ok 
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2012 at 13:08
Poached Salmon
 
 
Poached Eggs.
 
 
mmm
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35847
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2012 at 13:13
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I've poached salmon before, but generally I'm against the practice.
I assume that's you in your avatar when you were poaching salmon...


What you can't see is that before I poach it, I marinade it in my red manderwear.  Some like codpeices, I prefer pieces of poached salmon.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2012 at 17:47
Thanks for the laughs, last several posts.  LOL
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13058
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 03 2012 at 21:34

Poaching and hunting are two different things. Hunting requires a license and is overseen in most countries by an agency (like the state's Department of Natural Resources) to assure limits are maintained. In civilized countries, animals on an endangered list are not hunted (the whole point of an "endangered list"). As far as "trophy hunting", I know plenty of hunters with a trophy on the wall and meat from the hunt in the freezer. Poaching is an illegal activity with no regard to endangered animals (or people who get in the way, for that matter).

So the original question is flawed.

Edited by The Dark Elf - February 03 2012 at 21:35
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
thehallway View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 13:58
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

The food argument won't cut it anymore.

Obviously, nature works in such a way that you survive by eating other living things. Fine. 

We used to hunt to be able to survive. Fine.

In 2012, can any human on the planet (minus tribes) survive without hunting? YES.

So, we don't need to do it anymore. If we shared what we farmed properly, the world actually has TOO MUCH food.

And, obviously, taking away anything's life just for fun or sport, is ridiculous.



What's the difference between hunting a deer and raising a cow to be slaughtered?

Animals are obviously meant to eat each other. You cannot survive without taking life. So my argument is simple. In today's world, farming seems more structured, profesisonal and humane than small-scale hunting. Although treatment of farm animals has been dreadful, it is improving, and on the whole, farms can produce a lot more food with a lot less problems for the ecosystem. Hunting between animals is necessary, but now that we humans are at the top of the food chain and we have the means to survive without hunting, I really don't see it as necessary or fulfilling in any way.



Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34055
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 14:06
to quote Spiderman, "with great power comes great responibilaty" 

i did not meen to conuse in the introducution question but while i made it lots of topics came to mind not only poaching for endagerd animals but also trophy hunting, rich people invest in trips to Africa or India or other places to shoot animals just for own satisfactiory reasons  that i think is wrong
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 15:09
What about hunting cooks who poach foods?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 16:58
 ^ I think that's a movie
Back to Top
colorofmoney91 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 17:18
I won't vote because it depends on the type of animal and why it's being killed. If not endangered and for the purpose of food, sure. But murdering elephants and dolphins or whatever is totally not okay.
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 17:45
Originally posted by colorofmoney91 colorofmoney91 wrote:

If not endangered and for the purpose of food, sure.

I agree, but I don't like turning living animals into dead ones personally.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2012 at 18:43
How about we take people who like to kill endangered species for sport, kill them, cook them in a liquid bath, and feed them to wild animals?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2012 at 18:37
Oh, let's eat each other, and to hell with this poll! 
Back to Top
caretaker View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 19 2010
Location: united states
Status: Offline
Points: 288
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2012 at 20:53
Couldn't answer the poll question because of the way it was presented so I'll just say poaching bad, hunting good when done responsibly. A guy from Cuba told me that over there when a poacher is caught, two guys on horseback chased him through the cane field beating him with the flat side of a sword. Sounds fitting.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2012 at 21:40
It's not a cooking method I practice or am fond of.  When it comes to the other meaning, of course not.  When it comes to hunting for food, no problem.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2012 at 04:28
Originally posted by caretaker caretaker wrote:

Couldn't answer the poll question because of the way it was presented so I'll just say poaching bad, hunting good when done responsibly. A guy from Cuba told me that over there when a poacher is caught, two guys on horseback chased him through the cane field beating him with the flat side of a sword. Sounds fitting.


That sounds like a scene from a telenovela set in the 19th century, but I could be wrong.
Back to Top
refugee View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: November 20 2006
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 7026
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2012 at 07:31
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 ^ I think that's a movie


This one comes close:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cook,_the_Thief,_His_Wife_%26_Her_Lover
He say nothing is quite what it seems;
I say nothing is nothing
(Peter Hammill)
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2012 at 09:15
Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

The food argument won't cut it anymore.

Obviously, nature works in such a way that you survive by eating other living things. Fine. 

We used to hunt to be able to survive. Fine.

In 2012, can any human on the planet (minus tribes) survive without hunting? YES.

So, we don't need to do it anymore. If we shared what we farmed properly, the world actually has TOO MUCH food.

And, obviously, taking away anything's life just for fun or sport, is ridiculous.



What's the difference between hunting a deer and raising a cow to be slaughtered?

Animals are obviously meant to eat each other. You cannot survive without taking life. So my argument is simple. In today's world, farming seems more structured, profesisonal and humane than small-scale hunting. Although treatment of farm animals has been dreadful, it is improving, and on the whole, farms can produce a lot more food with a lot less problems for the ecosystem. Hunting between animals is necessary, but now that we humans are at the top of the food chain and we have the means to survive without hunting, I really don't see it as necessary or fulfilling in any way.



Is it necessary to eat cows? What if its more human and ecofriendly to only raise chickens? You're not really answering my question, you're just embedding your value system into it.

In PA, I'm sure the ecosystem benefits more from hunting the hugely overpopulated deer than from going through the costly process of raising a cow.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2012 at 12:47
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

The food argument won't cut it anymore.

Obviously, nature works in such a way that you survive by eating other living things. Fine. 

We used to hunt to be able to survive. Fine.

In 2012, can any human on the planet (minus tribes) survive without hunting? YES.

So, we don't need to do it anymore. If we shared what we farmed properly, the world actually has TOO MUCH food.

And, obviously, taking away anything's life just for fun or sport, is ridiculous.



What's the difference between hunting a deer and raising a cow to be slaughtered?

Animals are obviously meant to eat each other. You cannot survive without taking life. So my argument is simple. In today's world, farming seems more structured, profesisonal and humane than small-scale hunting. Although treatment of farm animals has been dreadful, it is improving, and on the whole, farms can produce a lot more food with a lot less problems for the ecosystem. Hunting between animals is necessary, but now that we humans are at the top of the food chain and we have the means to survive without hunting, I really don't see it as necessary or fulfilling in any way.



Is it necessary to eat cows? What if its more human and ecofriendly to only raise chickens? You're not really answering my question, you're just embedding your value system into it.

In PA, I'm sure the ecosystem benefits more from hunting the hugely overpopulated deer than from going through the costly process of raising a cow.


In fact, we could even "skip the cow" and eat the cereals that they are feed with. It would even cost less in regard to the huge quantity of water used to feed the cows and to make burgers, steaks, etc.

Oh, and when one has a problem of deer overpopulation, just hire a professional, skilled, made-for-it hunter: THE WOLF.

And I'm not exactly joking here.
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2012 at 14:35
The problem with the wolf is nobody seems to want them around. Not many animals are exterminated more than the wolf.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.