Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Libertarian Thread #2: We Shall Never Die!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLibertarian Thread #2: We Shall Never Die!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 326327328329330 350>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 10:06

Oh I know...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/il-gov-candidates-name-mispelled-as-rich-whitey-on-electronic-voting-machines.php

 
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 10:23
^Well, I wouldn't see it beyond the media to now call him Rum Paul in strict christian areas... 
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 10:31
This happened just today and is kind of linked in a way:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/ed-miliband-in--blackbusters--gaffe.html

LOL
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 10:38
Reminds me of a few years back when SC democrats voted for Al Greene in their primary for US senate because they thought he was the soul singer.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 12:57
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Reminds me of a few years back when SC democrats voted for Al Greene in their primary for US senate because they thought he was the soul singer.

I think The Temptations should rule by committee government. 
My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 19:21
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/irs-estimate-17-percent-taxes-204637410.html
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Online
Points: 16446 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2012 at 22:25
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/irs-estimate-17-percent-taxes-204637410.html
So much for fixing the deficit! Good job, IRS.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 00:06
Clearly a libertarian IRS!


Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65266 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 00:20
the Ron Paul ad he pulled attacking Huntsman for speaking Chinese to his adopted daughter is beyond contempt; I'm amazed and disappointed Paul would, or would allow, the ad to air or even be made.   Bad call, Ron.   Bad, bad call.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 00:47
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Oh I know...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/il-gov-candidates-name-mispelled-as-rich-whitey-on-electronic-voting-machines.php

 



LOL! American vote rigging at its finest.
Shame it's not like the olden days when you can just have someone watching you vote and stand there looking scary. We gotta be subtle now!

Ya know things like that above, or have minorities "accidentally" put on felon lists in Florida and have them disenfranchised in Ohio.
Oh whoops
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 01:52
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Did anyone know that Santorum thinks that contraception should be able to be banned? Wowza


Would you allow for individual states to pass such measures?

Not directed at me, but I think the availability of contraceptives is a human rights issue. States should not be able to pick and choose human rights issues, which is why I support legalization of same-sex marriage on a federal level. It may be an extreme side of the issue, but the States do not have a right to pick and choose to own slaves. It is fundamentally wrong. Just as is not making contraceptives available when they can be available.


I think there's a difference between what States should be able to do and how the federal government should interact with the States. I do not believe that any State should be able to ban contraceptives, but if our form of government is to actually work (I do not believe it can) I do not think the federal government can override a State that does so. This should be up to the people of the State to change.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 01:57
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

the Ron Paul ad he pulled attacking Huntsman for speaking Chinese to his adopted daughter is beyond contempt; I'm amazed and disappointed Paul would, or would allow, the ad to air or even be made.   Bad call, Ron.   Bad, bad call.



Ron Paul didn't do it. Supposidly, Ron Paul supporters in New Hampshire did it. It's a rogue group which apparently has done nothing except put up this video. It really has nothing to do with Ron Paul.

 Why would Paul waste limited funds on smearing a totally irrelevant candidate? I'm not saying it's necessarily some conspiracy against Paul. It could just be some stupid supporters of his, but it still has nothing to do with Ron himself.

Paul called the video disgusting and applauded Huntsman for his adoption.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 02:14
Probably is. Notice how there's fewer "I support this ad" and more "paid for the friends of..." ads.
Which is a way for a campaign to run horrible ads without supporting it or some fans who just do it themselves.
Paul doesn't seem like that type anyway.

Least I'd hope not.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65266 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 02:28
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt but it reflects badly on his supporters, who I'd never thought of as paranoid xenophobes living in the 1950s
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 08:42
A) There's a strong chance the ad was made by Huntsman supporters trying desperately to help their candidate.
B) How can a presidential candidate be held responsible for every supporter?  That's akin to saying the New York Yankees must be responsible for the behavior of every single fan they have nationally.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 10:03
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Probably is. Notice how there's fewer "I support this ad" and more "paid for the friends of..." ads.
Which is a way for a campaign to run horrible ads without supporting it or some fans who just do it themselves.
Paul doesn't seem like that type anyway.

Least I'd hope not.


Those ads are mostly released by his PAC. This is not. It has nothing to do with the campaign.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 10:04
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt but it reflects badly on his supporters, who I'd never thought of as paranoid xenophobes living in the 1950s




You mean if reflects badly on the handful of supporters who made the ad. I don't see how it reflects poorly on a supporter like me for example.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 10:33
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt but it reflects badly on his supporters, who I'd never thought of as paranoid xenophobes living in the 1950s




You mean if reflects badly on the handful of supporters who made the ad. I don't see how it reflects poorly on a supporter like me for example.

Yeah, guilt by association is wrong, but you should have second thoughts about who you are attracting...
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
Gamemako View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1184 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 12:10
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

A) There's a strong chance the ad was made by Huntsman supporters trying desperately to help their candidate.


Your insanity never ceases to amaze me.
Hail Eris!
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2012 at 13:21
Originally posted by Gamemako Gamemako wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

A) There's a strong chance the ad was made by Huntsman supporters trying desperately to help their candidate.


Your insanity never ceases to amaze me.
 
 
Funny, I think the same way about you.
 
I've worked in politics, btw, and that is far from beyond reason.  It is every bit as sensible to believe that supporters of Huntsman put it out, to make Paul supporters look bad, as it is Paul supporters put it out.  It's a dirty game.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 326327328329330 350>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.297 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.