Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - HIFI Advices please read
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHIFI Advices please read

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>
Author
Message
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2011 at 12:28
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Thanks Dean....totally makes sense. But is it then my mind playing tricks on me, when I actually see the sub under a table or next to a setup (like in Olivers case)...that I can tell where the low end is coming from and if I move around it seems to "disappear", the sound that is.
I have my Bose sub tucked behind a sofa at least 4.5m away from the small cube speakers.....I guess our ears can play tricks on us......


IMO a real sub is 38 cm diameter. Below, it just makes "boom boom".
As with any speakers, choose your sub to fit your room and the amount of sound absorbing furniture you have. In a small room (less than 30m³ or 1200 cubic-feet) with lots of hard surfaces a 38cm (15") sub will sound unpleasant. Also the speaker cab is more important than the diameter of the driver.
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2011 at 01:52
It doesn't sounds stupid on the paper but i recently moved my system to the living room but just before it was in a less than 30m2 room with low ceiling and full of furnitures and it wasn't sounding unpleasant at all...I think each room has its acoustic, some rooms stand the extreme low, others don't.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 18 2011 at 04:46
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

It doesn't sounds stupid on the paper but i recently moved my system to the living room but just before it was in a less than 30m2 room with low ceiling and full of furnitures and it wasn't sounding unpleasant at all...I think each room has its acoustic, some rooms stand the extreme low, others don't.
Obviously there is more to room acoustics than just size and I did mention sound absorbing vs. sound reflecting surfaces (ie the amount of soft and hard furniture in the room). Position is also important, a sub in a corner is going to reflect off 3 room surfaces whereas one placed in the middle of a wall will only reflect off two; and one place behind furniture/equipment rack will be absorbed/reflected differently to one in front that has no obstructions. However room size is the defining parameter - a small room will have a small volume of air to move, and a big sub will want to move more air than the room contains - this can dampen the dynamics of the speaker (something that constructors of sealed speaker & infinite baffle speaker cabinets know all about) - the rooms natural reasonance has a lot to do with how a sub will sound so matching the sub to the room is as important as matching the speaker cabinet to the speaker itself. While your sub didn't sound unpleasant in a small room, I suspect it would have sounded better with a smaller diameter driver, or in a bigger room, but if you are happy with the sound then that is the be all and end all of of it.
 
 
/edit: I notice in your picture there is something on top of the sub covered in a cloth - if that is a huge lump of concrete then I suspect you needed that to bring the sub under control in such a confined space. (I also note the bubble-wrap to stop the speaker cable from touching the sub Wink)


Edited by Dean - September 18 2011 at 04:58
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:32
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

It doesn't sounds stupid on the paper but i recently moved my system to the living room but just before it was in a less than 30m2 room with low ceiling and full of furnitures and it wasn't sounding unpleasant at all...I think each room has its acoustic, some rooms stand the extreme low, others don't.

Obviously there is more to room acoustics than just size and I did mention sound absorbing vs. sound reflecting surfaces (ie the amount of soft and hard furniture in the room). Position is also important, a sub in a corner is going to reflect off 3 room surfaces whereas one placed in the middle of a wall will only reflect off two; and one place behind furniture/equipment rack will be absorbed/reflected differently to one in front that has no obstructions. However room size is the defining parameter - a small room will have a small volume of air to move, and a big sub will want to move more air than the room contains - this can dampen the dynamics of the speaker (something that constructors of sealed speaker & infinite baffle speaker cabinets know all about) - the rooms natural reasonance has a lot to do with how a sub will sound so matching the sub to the room is as important as matching the speaker cabinet to the speaker itself. While your sub didn't sound unpleasant in a small room, I suspect it would have sounded better with a smaller diameter driver, or in a bigger room, but if you are happy with the sound then that is the be all and end all of of it.


 
 

/edit: I notice in your picture there is something on top of the sub covered in a cloth - if that is a huge lump of concrete then I suspect you needed that to bring the sub under control in such a confined space. (I also note the bubble-wrap to stop the speaker cable from touching the sub Wink)


OK it make sense.

There are about 75 kg of granite blocks on the sub, it's something that i use from a long time, my sub has been installed in two
different small rooms before and now it's in a quite big open space (the pic you saw) with a quite high ceiling (2,70m).

Whatever the room, heavy weight on sub tightens and globally enhances the low (and so affect the high as we saw before) by reducing the
"skin drum" effect.

Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:59
Ermm okay... yes it will sort of do that... the weight of the rock puts the sidewalls of the cabinet under tension, which only serves to move the resonance higher up the frequency spectrum, it will also create a sub-sonic pendulum type effect (stick with a weight on the end) which may not be such a good idea. But, again - if it works for you then that's fine. Frankly I'm surprised that the sub needed such drastic (and brutal) treatment - those design guys at Magnat should be able to design a cab that doesn't rattle.
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 08:13
Some audiophiles even put some hydraulic jacks on all sides of their subs...

It not only works for me but for everybody: if you don't do that, the low dribbles. The effect is huge. Anyway, it's not the fault of engineers but money and weight contraints. Including a 100lbs plate would have a cost in freight as well. If you want your sub to work fully, you have to add weight or find another way, that's why optimization is necessary.

Brutal treatment? To my knowledge, subwoofers don't have mindstates, i think a rationalist like you would agree with that

EDIT: i added a 1mm layer of felt under the granite blocks (as well as those on the source elements) to lower extra resonances with the elements on which the blocks are.

Edited by oliverstoned - September 19 2011 at 08:22
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 10:05
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Some audiophiles even put some hydraulic jacks on all sides of their subs...

It not only works for me but for everybody: if you don't do that, the low dribbles. The effect is huge. Anyway, it's not the fault of engineers but money and weight contraints. Including a 100lbs plate would have a cost in freight as well. If you want your sub to work fully, you have to add weight or find another way, that's why optimization is necessary.
LOL ...  Stern Smile Nope. That "theory" does not hold water - in a market sector where money is no object the extra freight charges would be negligible, or at least a "feature" worth exploiting. This does not appear to be the case - as far as I know subs are not sold with 70kg ballast weights in any of the market sectors were subs are used (surely the ICE and PA markets would be just as interested in this, if not more so), nor are there a readily available sources of add-on ballast weights for after-sales fitting available in the audiophilist stores.
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



Brutal treatment? To my knowledge, subwoofers don't have mindstates, i think a rationalist like you would agree with that
Something does not have to be sentient to be subjected to brutal treatment - flattening a warped vinyl with a 50 tonnes road-roller would be brutal.
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:


EDIT: i added a 1mm layer of felt under the granite blocks (as well as those on the source elements) to lower extra resonances with the elements on which the blocks are.
No it doesn't, but never mind, if you think it does then that's fine, you carry on. At least you've protected the cabinet from being scratched by a lump of rock.
 


Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 10:07
What?
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:34
If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:47
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame...
Yeah, I've done that with some of the ported subs I've built - a neat party trick. LOL
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

...I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?
Your guess is as good as mine - adding extra weight in the main speaker stands (eg sand-filled) would help somewhat, and I guess that the slabs of marble on top of each piece of electronic equipment do more to deaden acoustic rattle from the sub than they do any electrical induction they are intended to prevent, (however their resonance is most likely to be in the audio band anyway - if you tap them with a hammer they're going to go "ding" rather than "thud" which would result in sound reflection rather than absorption). I would also imagine there could be some weird phase relationships between sub and left-channel speaker - then that may improve the sound-stage - only Oliver would know that for sure.
 
 


Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 12:47
What?
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2011 at 14:10
^ I guess I was thinking the left speaker would give off a different "coloration" than the right speaker since possibly the left cones would be moving more than the right ones.
I mean I doubt I would notice but maybe high-end audiophile, tubificational type amplificational system would actually amplify the different "colorations"........so to speak
Big smile
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 01:38
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Frankly I'm surprised that the sub needed such drastic (and brutal) treatment


I don't listen to theories and formulas but to sound. You'd be surprised by the gap between your theories and experience.

My hifi guru (the guy who learned me all i know thanks to his 40 years of experience)is himself an engineer from the famous Poytechnique school and from the first day he told me that engineers were
painful because they think they know everything whereas this knowledge is only theorical.


Edited by oliverstoned - September 20 2011 at 03:27
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 02:18
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ I guess I was thinking the left speaker would give off a different "coloration" than the right speaker since possibly the left cones would be moving more than the right ones.
I mean I doubt I would notice but maybe high-end audiophile, tubificational type amplificational system would actually amplify the different "colorations"........so to speak
Big smile
That one is simple to prove or disprove by practical experiment: disconnect the cables from the left speaker and play some music - any sympathetic vibration (hell, any vibration) in the left speaker cone will produce an electrical signal across the speaker terminals that can be measured on an oscilloscope even if you cannot physically see (or feel) any movement in the cone itself - the difference between a speaker and a microphone is simply size. How big that induced signal is will determine how much of an effect it would have on the left channel's sound/colouration.

Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 02:21
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 03:34
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?


Of course the sub produces its own vibrations which may affect the rack of electronics if close. Putting heavy weight also lower the unwanted vibrations produced by the sub, a second effect of that upgrade.
Rather than smoky theories and formulas, the best is to try and listen.
Because we don't listen to theories but to sound.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 03:43
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Frankly I'm surprised that the sub needed such drastic (and brutal) treatment


I don't listen to theories and formulas but to sound. You'd be surprised by the gap between your theories and experience.

I have yet to discover any difference between theory and experience in the realm of hi-fi electronics and audio acoustics. My 40 years of practical experience in applying theory into practice has taught me to question, analyse and understand cause and effect - nothing happens by magic no matter how hard you wish that it would, acoustics are not governed by the supernatural but by very basic physics that is taught in school rooms across the planet. Ignoring the 'theories and formulas' does not make them go away.

Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 03:45
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:21
So why are you so categoric in your speech?

I don't ignore theories, i simply don't care about it.
Only the result counts for me. And if i'd follow your theories, my system would be an ordinary badly sounding one.



Edited by oliverstoned - September 20 2011 at 04:33
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:24
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?


Of course the sub produces its own vibrations which may affect the rack of electronics if close. Putting heavy weight also lower the unwanted vibrations produced by the sub, a second effect of that upgrade.
Rather than smoky theories and formulas, the best is to try and listen.
Because we don't listen to theories but to sound.
Nah, you cannot prove that  is the "a second effect" - if (as you say) that adding the slab of marble on top of your passive pre-amplifier affects the sound you hear then that 'improvement' is in suppressing the primary source of unwanted noise, which would be the rattle of the pre-amp casing caused by the proximity of the sub woofer and not to any 'theoretical' yet completely undetectable electromagnetic inductions into the electronics caused by the vibration (which is what you have claimed is the first effect).
 
I also question the use of an acoustically resonant and very reflective marble slab here - this is not just smoky theory, this is supported by practical observation - take a sound source into a marble/ceramic bathroom if you want proof.
 
And none of that is smoky theory and formulas - that was all derived from practical observation and a practical knowledge from years of experience.
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:25
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

So why are you so categoric in your speech?
I cannot say that I have been, certainly less so than yours at least.
What?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:29
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?
Of course the sub produces its own vibrations which may affect the rack of electronics if close. Putting heavy weight also lower the unwanted vibrations produced by the sub, a second effect of that upgrade. Rather than smoky theories and formulas, the best is to try and listen. Because we don't listen to theories but to sound.

Nah, you cannot prove that  is the "a second effect" - if (as you say) that adding the slab of marble on top of your passive pre-amplifier affects the sound you hear then that 'improvement' is in suppressing the primary source of unwanted noise, which would be the rattle of the pre-amp casing caused by the proximity of the sub woofer and not to any 'theoretical' yet completely undetectable electromagnetic inductions into the electronics caused by the vibration (which is what you have claimed is the first effect).
 

I also question the use of an acoustically resonant and very reflective marble slab here - this is not just smoky theory, this is supported by practical observation - take a sound source into a marble/ceramic bathroom if you want proof.

 

And none of that is smoky theory and formulas - that was all derived from practical observation and a practical knowledge from years of experience.


I cannot prove it but i don't care as i've heard (and everything would) that it works. That's all. Now you can spell your whole life in speculations of all kinds whereas i'm listening to a great sound.

Everyone to its own thing.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:31
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

So why are you so categoric in your speech?

I cannot say that I have been, certainly less so than yours at least.


No because i'm experienced and you're not. You're experienced with theories only.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:53
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



I cannot prove it but i don't care as i've heard (and everything would) that it works. That's all. Now you can spell your whole life in speculations of all kinds whereas i'm listening to a great sound.

Everyone to its own thing.
 
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



No because i'm experienced and you're not. You're experienced with theories only.
 
Really? I do not see how anything I have said here should warrant such snipes as these, but this is not the first time you have answered my posts with such comments. You can choose to ignore my years of practical knowledge and experience of working with audio electronics as a designer and constructor, as a user in the home, studio and public address environments and my demonstrated ability to make observational deductions based upon the evidence you provide and just concentrate on my theoretical knowledge built up over that time if you like.
 
I simply provide alternative opinions to those that you present - I know I will never change your view, but if one person reading my posts gains understanding and insight then I shall continue to analyse, try to understand and then offer a feasible explaination for every claim made on this subject.


Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 04:55
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.189 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.