HIFI Advices please read |
Post Reply | Page <1 5678> |
Author | |||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 12:28 | ||
As with any speakers, choose your sub to fit your room and the amount of sound absorbing furniture you have. In a small room (less than 30m³ or 1200 cubic-feet) with lots of hard surfaces a 38cm (15") sub will sound unpleasant. Also the speaker cab is more important than the diameter of the driver.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 17 2011 at 01:52 | ||
It doesn't sounds stupid on the paper but i recently moved my system to the living room but just before it was in a less than 30m2 room with low ceiling and full of furnitures and it wasn't sounding unpleasant at all...I think each room has its acoustic, some rooms stand the extreme low, others don't.
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 18 2011 at 04:46 | ||
/edit: I notice in your picture there is something on top of the sub covered in a cloth - if that is a huge lump of concrete then I suspect you needed that to bring the sub under control in such a confined space. (I also note the bubble-wrap to stop the speaker cable from touching the sub ) Edited by Dean - September 18 2011 at 04:58 |
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:32 | ||
OK it make sense. There are about 75 kg of granite blocks on the sub, it's something that i use from a long time, my sub has been installed in two different small rooms before and now it's in a quite big open space (the pic you saw) with a quite high ceiling (2,70m). Whatever the room, heavy weight on sub tightens and globally enhances the low (and so affect the high as we saw before) by reducing the "skin drum" effect. |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:59 | ||
okay... yes it will sort of do that... the weight of the rock puts the sidewalls of the cabinet under tension, which only serves to move the resonance higher up the frequency spectrum, it will also create a sub-sonic pendulum type effect (stick with a weight on the end) which may not be such a good idea. But, again - if it works for you then that's fine. Frankly I'm surprised that the sub needed such drastic (and brutal) treatment - those design guys at Magnat should be able to design a cab that doesn't rattle.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 08:13 | ||
Some audiophiles even put some hydraulic jacks on all sides of their subs...
It not only works for me but for everybody: if you don't do that, the low dribbles. The effect is huge. Anyway, it's not the fault of engineers but money and weight contraints. Including a 100lbs plate would have a cost in freight as well. If you want your sub to work fully, you have to add weight or find another way, that's why optimization is necessary. Brutal treatment? To my knowledge, subwoofers don't have mindstates, i think a rationalist like you would agree with that EDIT: i added a 1mm layer of felt under the granite blocks (as well as those on the source elements) to lower extra resonances with the elements on which the blocks are. Edited by oliverstoned - September 19 2011 at 08:22 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 10:05 | ||
... Nope. That "theory" does not hold water - in a market sector where money is no object the extra freight charges would be negligible, or at least a "feature" worth exploiting. This does not appear to be the case - as far as I know subs are not sold with 70kg ballast weights in any of the market sectors were subs are used (surely the ICE and PA markets would be just as interested in this, if not more so), nor are there a readily available sources of add-on ballast weights for after-sales fitting available in the audiophilist stores.
Something does not have to be sentient to be subjected to brutal treatment - flattening a warped vinyl with a 50 tonnes road-roller would be brutal.
No it doesn't, but never mind, if you think it does then that's fine, you carry on. At least you've protected the cabinet from being scratched by a lump of rock.
Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 10:07 |
|||
What?
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:34 | ||
If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?
|
|||
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:47 | ||
Yeah, I've done that with some of the ported subs I've built - a neat party trick.
Your guess is as good as mine - adding extra weight in the main speaker stands (eg sand-filled) would help somewhat, and I guess that the slabs of marble on top of each piece of electronic equipment do more to deaden acoustic rattle from the sub than they do any electrical induction they are intended to prevent, (however their resonance is most likely to be in the audio band anyway - if you tap them with a hammer they're going to go "ding" rather than "thud" which would result in sound reflection rather than absorption). I would also imagine there could be some weird phase relationships between sub and left-channel speaker - then that may improve the sound-stage - only Oliver would know that for sure.
Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 12:47 |
|||
What?
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 14:10 | ||
^ I guess I was thinking the left speaker would give off a different "coloration" than the right speaker since possibly the left cones would be moving more than the right ones.
I mean I doubt I would notice but maybe high-end audiophile, tubificational type amplificational system would actually amplify the different "colorations"........so to speak
|
|||
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 01:38 | ||
I don't listen to theories and formulas but to sound. You'd be surprised by the gap between your theories and experience. My hifi guru (the guy who learned me all i know thanks to his 40 years of experience)is himself an engineer from the famous Poytechnique school and from the first day he told me that engineers were painful because they think they know everything whereas this knowledge is only theorical. Edited by oliverstoned - September 20 2011 at 03:27 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 02:18 | ||
Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 02:21 |
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 03:34 | ||
Of course the sub produces its own vibrations which may affect the rack of electronics if close. Putting heavy weight also lower the unwanted vibrations produced by the sub, a second effect of that upgrade. Rather than smoky theories and formulas, the best is to try and listen. Because we don't listen to theories but to sound. |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 03:43 | ||
Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 03:45 |
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:21 | ||
So why are you so categoric in your speech?
I don't ignore theories, i simply don't care about it. Only the result counts for me. And if i'd follow your theories, my system would be an ordinary badly sounding one. Edited by oliverstoned - September 20 2011 at 04:33 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:24 | ||
I also question the use of an acoustically resonant and very reflective marble slab here - this is not just smoky theory, this is supported by practical observation - take a sound source into a marble/ceramic bathroom if you want proof.
And none of that is smoky theory and formulas - that was all derived from practical observation and a practical knowledge from years of experience.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:25 | ||
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:29 | ||
I cannot prove it but i don't care as i've heard (and everything would) that it works. That's all. Now you can spell your whole life in speculations of all kinds whereas i'm listening to a great sound. Everyone to its own thing. |
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:31 | ||
No because i'm experienced and you're not. You're experienced with theories only. |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:53 | ||
Really? I do not see how anything I have said here should warrant such snipes as these, but this is not the first time you have answered my posts with such comments. You can choose to ignore my years of practical knowledge and experience of working with audio electronics as a designer and constructor, as a user in the home, studio and public address environments and my demonstrated ability to make observational deductions based upon the evidence you provide and just concentrate on my theoretical knowledge built up over that time if you like.
I simply provide alternative opinions to those that you present - I know I will never change your view, but if one person reading my posts gains understanding and insight then I shall continue to analyse, try to understand and then offer a feasible explaination for every claim made on this subject. Edited by Dean - September 20 2011 at 04:55 |
|||
What?
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 5678> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |