Bin Laden is dead.

All the dialysis thing was known... It's not entirely unthinkable that, even without having killed him, he would've died pretty soon (or had been death for w hile)... 

 

The T wrote: As I said I understand the joy and celebrations... It's sad because I remember the minutes after 9/11 footage was shown of celebrations in the middle east... Hell some Anti-US people in my country (and all south america) celebrated... Humanity is repulsive I guess..

Yes, these two things are totally equivalent.  I see no difference whatsoever between the death of 3000 people and the death of the person who killed them. 

manofmystery wrote: Actually, Bin Laden slipped away to Argentina to live with a 122 year old Hitler, whose his new robotic heart has him gearing up for a comeback.

Robot Hitler has my vote, but I'm gonna need to see the birth certificate. 

The question is not whether to trust Daily Mail but whether to trust David Ray Griffin. At least DM got the title and the author right:

http://www.amazon.com/Osama-Bin-Laden-Dead-Alive/dp/1566567831

Rolling my eyes @ u T

refugee wrote: The question is not whether to trust Daily Mail but whether to trust David Ray Griffin. At least DM got the title and the author right: http://www.amazon.com/Osama-Bin-Laden-Dead-Alive/dp/1566567831

Oh man, a mountain a circumstantial evidence! Maybe I can get him to publish all these anecdotes I have as a scientific study. 

I actually like this reaction from the Canadian PM:  we received the news of Bin Laden's death with "sober satisfaction".

The T wrote: JFK i'm still unconvinced about Oswald being alone but probably he was

Speaking of which, did anyone else see that Discovery Channel program about replicating the shot? They came remarkably close.

Henry Plainview wrote:   The T wrote: Explain please. I see groups of people celebrating other groups of people's deaths. In this case, the US is celebrating the death of ONE person apparently responsible for 3000 deaths. In the first case, Palestinians (for example) were celebrating the death of 3000 people (and, most importantly, the big strike to US' pride) apparently (in their eyes) responsible for years and decades of oppression via their next-door allies... I've said I understand the joy this time, but it's still sad and even disgusting to celebrate death. And yet, those 3000 people had nothing to do with Israel, so perhaps not all viewpoints are equal.

No they aren't. But you still fail to grasp the deeper concept behind "celebrating death" do you? Whoseever death it is, celebrating it is nothing to be proud about. I said I understand it and have nothing bad to say about the people who relatives died that day but it still seems sad...

Edited by The T - May 02 2011 at 12:40

Gamemako wrote: The T wrote: JFK i'm still unconvinced about Oswald being alone but probably he was Speaking of which, did anyone else see that Discovery Channel program about replicating the shot? They came remarkably close.

Atkingani wrote: Just remembering that Al Qaeda killed innocent people around the world including in poor countries like Kenya and Tanzania, and also Spain and the UK. Even in the rich countries the majority of the victims were common people, simple workers... Their "war" was (is) insane!

I never wanted to kill anyone when I flew fighter aircraft. It was a duty. But when 911 happenned if wished I was still in the military and without hesitation I would have gone out on any insane mission to get rid of this c**t. Whenever a Canadian solier dies over in Afghanistan I weep.

I might add that I saw the 911 attacks live on CNN and I thought I was watching a Spieberg movie. I got on the horn (phone ) with an old  flying buddy.

All thw people that died in the World Trade Center were innocent people trying to make an hohnest living. These Islamic fanatics are far from innocent.

I am agnostic but I I believe anyonne should be allowed to possess religious beliefs so long as they are peaceful.


Edited by Vibrationbaby - May 02 2011 at 12:52

I don't believe it.