Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Meat-Eater or Veggi?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMeat-Eater or Veggi?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>
Poll Question: What are you?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
69 [87.34%]
8 [10.13%]
2 [2.53%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:03
Originally posted by lastplaneout lastplaneout wrote:

There might be some evolutionary advantage in being disgusted by nervous system tissue. There are diseases that are transmitted through the consumption of nervous system tissue (and that aren't necessarily killed by cooking). Mad Cow disease, Kuru, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease are all examples. So maybe individuals who are disgusted by eating brains would run less of a risk of contracting these disorders.

Perhaps. Though, it isn't likely I would start eating brains for breakfast every morning, even if I ended up enjoying the taste. Seems more like a rare occasion to me. 
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:05
My father was a POW in Japan during WW2.  His diet during that time was mostly fish heads.  Needless to say, when we had fish (which was not often) the head was not attached.
 
Eyes are just another muscle.  I do not care to eat them.
 
We have lost our connection with our food.  My grandmother was a caterer...weddings, company picnics, the like.  If you wanted fried chicken and you lived in Montgomery County or thereabouts, you went to my grandmother.  She in turn went out to Mrs. Pittman's, and between the two of them they'd kill however many chickens were required.  Round 'em up, get out the axe, chop off the heads...forty/fifty at a time.  Pluck 'em.  Fry 'em up.  She had a friend and assistant, Mrs. Jacobs, a black woman, who always came in through the back door, never the front (we're talking 50's-60's here).  They would fry up those chicken on big ass gas stoves all day.
 
Now?  We go to the store.  We buy chicken pieces if we're lazy, whole chicken if there's time for chopping them up.   
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
lastplaneout View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: November 04 2010
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:10
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by lastplaneout lastplaneout wrote:

There might be some evolutionary advantage in being disgusted by nervous system tissue. There are diseases that are transmitted through the consumption of nervous system tissue (and that aren't necessarily killed by cooking). Mad Cow disease, Kuru, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease are all examples. So maybe individuals who are disgusted by eating brains would run less of a risk of contracting these disorders.

Perhaps. Though, it isn't likely I would start eating brains for breakfast every morning, even if I ended up enjoying the taste. Seems more like a rare occasion to me. 


There's a breakfast restaurant near me that has "Brains and Eggs" on the menu. If I weren't vegetarian I would try it just for the experience, but I'm not sure that I would enjoy it.
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:18
Yuck.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:31
I like meat but as time goes on I feel increasingly guilty about eating it for ecological reasons. Going vegetarian is good for the environment as the meat industry causes starvation and wrecks the environment. Going to seafood is in some ways worse because the ocean is nearly fished out.
 
But in typically cognitively dissonant fashion I continue to eat meat all the time.
 
I can't help it, NZ bacon is just too good.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:32
Oh and having lived in China for years I've just about eaten everything. Had frog for Christmas dinner one year.
 
Worst thing though was, surpisingly, duck eggs. They're HORRIBLE.
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 15:52
Well there was that 'Faces of Death' video where the people were consuming a live monkey's brain.  That's probably where I draw the line.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 18:01
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

I like meat but as time goes on I feel increasingly guilty about eating it for ecological reasons. Going vegetarian is good for the environment as the meat industry causes starvation and wrecks the environment. Going to seafood is in some ways worse because the ocean is nearly fished out.
 
But in typically cognitively dissonant fashion I continue to eat meat all the time.
 
I can't help it, NZ bacon is just too good.

You can't feed 6 billion people by foraging so no matter what we eat we are a massive ecological impact looking for somewhere to hit next. Since we have to resort to intensive farming to feed a population everything we grow buggers up the ecology of somewhere - whether we grow turnips to feed ourselves or our cattle we still need to grow the turnips. The reality for peoples living on islands or in small mainland countries is we simply cannot grow enough protein-rich vegetables to feed ourselves, but we can grow the crappy low-protein ones (like turnips) that we can then feed to animals who convert them into high-protein meat. Whether we are vegetarian or omnivore, most island nations and small mainland countries cannot grow the diversity of food that we require in our daily diet so we have to import it. The moment we have to transport any food from one country to another we take another ecological bite out of the environment, and if that bite is in the transportation of low value foods (low protein, low calorie, low energy) then the ecological impact is disproportional higher.

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 avec le tête 

Now picture your old French teacher scolding you.  Geek

I couldn't possibly eat a female head...

Actually I picture all my old French teachers with the drive shaft of an alternator rammed up their arrière-train so as I murder their precious language they can spin merrily in their graves providing the world with something useful in return.
What?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 18:24
I'm just your basic vore.  Well, not entirely true as I like things that aren't necessarily basic.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 19:52
Actually I think Textbook got it right, raising cattle is a very wasteful way to create food. They take up a lot of space and food.
This isn't related to what Text was saying,but as an added bonus, I don't eat beef and my recent check-up had numbers easily in the upper 90 percentile or higher, cholesterol, blood pressure, weight distrubution etc.

The beef industry has a lot of pals in big government here in the US.

Edited by Easy Money - November 04 2010 at 20:50
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 20:29
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:


Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 avec le tête 

Now picture your old French teacher scolding you.  Geek

I couldn't possibly eat a female head...

Actually I picture all my old French teachers with the drive shaft of an alternator rammed up their arrière-train so as I murder their precious language they can spin merrily in their graves providing the world with something useful in return.

You make your point as eloquently as ever, mon vieux... Tongue
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:29
EasyMoney: Apparently fast food companies are one of the biggest causes of hunger among people because of the colossal amount of grain they use in feeding their livestock, particularly cattle. If this grain were distributed to people world hunger would almost be wiped out.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 03:29
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:


This isn't related to what Text was saying,but as an added bonus, I don't eat beef and my recent check-up had numbers easily in the upper 90 percentile or higher, cholesterol, blood pressure, weight distrubution
I eat beef, lamb and pork in moderation as part of a balanced omnivorous diet along with fish, chicken and copious vegetables - my LDL cholesterol levels are 2.6 and have "normal" blood pressure. I am a little short for my weight - however, the two vegetarians I work alongside have worse BMIs than I.


Edited by Dean - November 05 2010 at 03:30
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 05:36
^ Glad to hear you are in good health, some "vegetarians" I know have terrible diets. Unless you know what you are doing, just cutting all meat out of your diet isn't necessarily going to help you.

Edited by Easy Money - November 05 2010 at 05:41
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 11:03
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ Glad to hear you are in good health, some "vegetarians" I know have terrible diets. Unless you know what you are doing, just cutting all meat out of your diet isn't necessarily going to help you.

I have no problem with vegetarians and what they eat - it's their choice and their health so it is up to them - I'll not be judgemental, emotional or critical unless they use similar arguments first. Pets as food; gross-out naked lunch moments; heath issues and environmental impact arguments are all emotional responses that can be used as personal justifications for being a vegetarian, but they are not reliable arguments for converting or inferring criticism on omnis.
 
Vegetarianism isn't a health diet - I can be just as healthy with including meat in my diet, often more so because my digestive system has evolved for an omnivorous diet. What my biology hasn't evolved for is the ease and frequency that I can obtain meat products and processed meat products, but that is also true of high-sugar content vegetable products and processed vegetable products.
 
I don't have four stomachs or the right kind of teeth, I cannot chew the cud and I don't posess a gut full of the right enzymes and bacteria to digest vast quantities of raw plant matter, my appendix works in producing some bacteria and gut flora but cannot break down cellulose - external energy and processing is required to make plants edible for humans - none of that is particularily ecological or environmentally friendly and it certainly does not have a zero carbon-footprint - decomposing plant matter of all the bits of a plant we can't, don't or won't eat releases the carbon back into the atmosphere.
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Actually I think Textbook got it right, raising cattle is a very wasteful way to create food. They take up a lot of space and food.
  
The problem is not what we eat, but what we don't eat - our efficiency as growers is not matched by our efficiency as consumers, what we waste is more of a concern than what we eat and we eat less of the plants we grow than we do of the animals we farm.
 
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

EasyMoney: Apparently fast food companies are one of the biggest causes of hunger among people because of the colossal amount of grain they use in feeding their livestock, particularly cattle. If this grain were distributed to people world hunger would almost be wiped out.
This is sort-of true. Fast-food companies do not cause hunger - the grain (and by that I assume you mean all fodder crops, not just corn) is grown to feed cattle - if it wasn't used to feed cattle it wouldn't be grown at all, the land would still be forest and the people would still be hungry. It is not being grown where the people are hungry - sustaining a population on one side of the planet with food grown on the other side is a gross inefficiency and ecologically unsound.
 
However intensive non-grazing meat production is inefficient in terms of land usage and more expensive when compared to grazing and grazing+supplements. Grain-fed cattle are primarily used for dairy and fast food meat production and the later is (of course) part of (and the bane of) the Western diet. Growing "meat" is an inefficient use of fertile, productive arable land whereas grass grows just about anywhere there is soil and water. So low productive low-fertile land can be used to grow meat, and that is an efficient use of land and resources once the issue of water management has been addressed.
 
Grain is not the only fodder-crop, nor is it the most prevalent. We don't eat soya beans in appreciable quantity, but we do eat them in vast numbers processed and this processing comes in three main forms - for direct human consumption (bean curd/tofu, 'milk', protein powder, oil, meat substitute, etc); as animal fodder; as fertiliser. All of that requires resources other than just the beans themselves, all of that requires transportation over vast distances from grower, to processor to consumer and all of that requires energy. Soya production has a huge impact on the environment and is responsible for 32% of rainforest deforestation in Brazil alone. Redirecting the beans away from animal fodder into direct human consumption does not alter the overall equation or solve any of the root problems.
 


Edited by Dean - November 05 2010 at 11:16
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 11:27
If anyone thinks I'm trying to convince anyone elese to be more of a vegetarian, they are crazy I rarely argue with anyone on the internet about anything anymore, except musicological stuff occasionally.
I've suckered for some political arguments in the past, but that is a waste of time.

If I talk about eating cats, dogs, eyeballs or sucking the brains and eyes out of crayfish (a southern delicacy I enjoy now and again) its just out of curiosity and my tendency to look at things from uncomfortable or unusual viewpoints. If people enjoy eating flesh, they should. I suppose the only conclusion from the cat/dog/eyeball discussion would be that meat eaters can be sensitive, complicated and finicky.
As far as the beef industry goes, I'm sure there is a lot of waste in the food industry in general, and I think raising cattle is obviously one of those things.

Edited by Easy Money - November 05 2010 at 11:55
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 11:46
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

If anyone thinks I'm trying to convince anyone elese to be more of a vegetarian, they are crazy I rarely argue with anyone on the internet about anything anymore, except musicological stuff occasionally.
I've suckered for some political arguments in the past, but that is a waste of time.

If I talk about eating cats, dogs, eyeballs or sucking the brains and eyes out of crayfish (a southern delicacy I enjoy now and again) its just out of curiosity and my tendency to look at things from uncomfortable or unusual viewpoints. If people enjoy eating flesh, they should. I suppose the only conclusion from the cat/dog/eyeball discussion would be that meat eaters can be sensitive, complicated and finicky too.
As far as the beef industry goes, I'm sure there is a lot of waste in the food industry in general, and I think raising cattle is obviously one of those things.
Oh, my mistake - I assumed that by using the same statements and perspectives used by many internet vegetarians you were making similar claims.Tongue
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 11:54
I can understand that assumption because a lot of people flock to the internet to argue as a hobby, but although I have been sucked into these things in the past, I have rarely seen anyone change their mind due to an argument on the internet. Its a waste of time usually.

EDIT: I also avoid militant vegetarians like the plague, they are extremely annoying to me.

Edited by Easy Money - November 05 2010 at 12:24
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2010 at 12:09
Anyway, I thought the personal stories and reflections about cats/dogs/eyeballs was a lot more interesting than another tedious internet argument about vegetarianism that is going to go nowhere.

I got the feeling I have a better stomach for some weird flesh food than some of our meat eaters, although I can't match up to Moris who would probably enjoy our southern favorite, the so-called "mud bugs".
Back to Top
Billy Pilgrim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 28 2010
Location: Austin
Status: Offline
Points: 1505
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2010 at 05:25
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by Billy Pilgrim Billy Pilgrim wrote:

I once helped my friend slaughter a pig, my diets been getting closer to option two ever since.. so, to me eating meat is kind of gross, specialy with the meat companies today. So every once in awhile I'll have some natural chicken/fish, but I'm trying to be more of a vegetarian for health purposes and other beliefs. On this issue I say to each his own, weather or not other people eat meat doesn't affect me at all, and it's not something I try to push on other people.

Perfectly logical reasons for changing your attitude, and absolutely admirable reasons for not wanting to influence other people. Impressive, honest post all around. Clap


Thank you J Locke!!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.230 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.