Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Live together or marry first?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLive together or marry first?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Poll Question: Cohabitation, shacking, whatever the term, do you approve?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [50.00%]
10 [19.23%]
16 [30.77%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 06:58
They should definitely live together first ... and if they don't marry, that's fine with me, too. Personally I think that people should get tax benefits for raising children - not for living together, marriage or not.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:03
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Personally I think that people should get tax benefits for raising children - not for living together, marriage or not.


But they are, in most countries that I know. Isn't this happening in Germany too?


Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:22
^^ nah, tax the breaders, don't reward them Evil Smile
What?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:26
Originally posted by mystic fred mystic fred wrote:

Living together before being married is like opening all your Christmas presents in November....Ouch
 
 
.


Clap

Marriage first.  No surprise from me.

But I believe in divorce even less than I do cohabitation before marriage.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:26
^ Well, in countries which are suffering from overpopulation that might be the solution.

@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:40
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ Well, in countries which are suffering from overpopulation that might be the solution.

@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 
Demographically each country has an overpopulation "problem" in some social stratas and an underpopulation "problem" in others - I think that is the natural order of things and not something that should be subject to tax benefits. Rewarding breading, or punishing those that exercises (birth) control, doesn't solve the problem or create it. 
What?
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:41
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^^ nah, tax the breaders, don't reward them Evil Smile


Clap



Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:41
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 


I think that marriage is encouraged this way exactly because it's traditionally considered a fundamental step towards raising a family; I don't think there are states encouraging marriage just for itself.

I agree that this kind of discrimination probably relies on the older perception that marriage is the way to raise a family and people who don't marry are probably not interested in family life, which is not true anymore. The way France addapted to the new times was to "legalize" non-marriage; you can register a concubinaje and you get the same legal status to that of a marriage (including the benefits). It is only a half-measure, but it does work well; it, combined with the benefits offered for having children, makes France have the second highest birth rate in the EU (why does Germany have the lowest birth rate in the EU? Shocked)
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:58
There must something in the water in Ireland, though, and I can't figure out what it is LOL
Back to Top
spookytooth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 06 2008
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Status: Offline
Points: 438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:05
Personally, I think marriage is rather silly. However, I do understand why people marry. Still, I think it's fine if a couple lives together before they marry. I really see nothing wrong with it.

Would you like some Bailey's?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:11
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

There must something in the water in Ireland, though, and I can't figure out what it is LOL
Poitín Wink
What?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:17
60%–95%? Wow LOL
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:19
Just my own experience:
 
My wife and I lived together for 3 years and already had a child when we got married (our second was on the way). We had personally committed to each other for the long haul long before the first pregnancy.
 
We saw our marriage as a announcement to society of the pledge we'd already made. Yes, a celebration of our relationship in front of our family and friends. We were formalizing things.
 
And our two incomes kick us into a much higher tax bracket. Not sure there's much benefit. But I haven't run the numbers side by side for a few years, because it's not an option anymore.
 
 
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:45
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

There must something in the water in Ireland, though, and I can't figure out what it is LOL
Poitín Wink

Irish Spring? Tongue
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 09:00
I also think it is a personal decision.

There is one practical issue that favors not marrying though, especially in the US with the health care thing. Here, if an unlucky mix of major illness and loss of insurance hits one partner, the couple as a unit could be buried in the massive bills, bankruptcy, and ruination of the credit of both.  An unmarried couple with similar problem would only see one of the two in these straights, the other one's credit would not be ruined and thus the healthy one would be able to provide for both of them. 

When it comes to this scenario, which is rare but does happen, it seems unmarrieds are almost safer from the catastrophe.  
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13627
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 09:17
My missus & I lived together for a short while before getting married, and I've never regretted a moment, but it really is up to individuals. One size doesn't fit everybody.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 10:19
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

A lot of people live together first as a kind of "test drive" to see if they can stand being around each other for extended priods of time. In my view, if you need a test drive, you shouldn't be getting married.


Maybe a little short-sighted...

As far as an emotional attachment/relationship goes, yes, you can be pretty sure early on - face it, everyone's on their best behaviour when (to use an archaic term) dating, so everything will be hunky dory whenever you see each other.

What you don't get when dating is the real personality of a person, when they get mood swings, what they're really like 1st thing in the morning, or when they get in from a crappy day at work... Are they lazy? Are they untidy? Are they generally inconsiderate?

I guess what I'm trying to say is when you date, you see people at their best, when you live together you see them at their worst - if you can cope with both & still say you love your partner, then go for it

My wife & I have been together 22 years, lived together for 20 of those & next week sees our 17th wedding anniversary, so seems to have worked for us

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 10:35
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

A lot of people live together first as a kind of "test drive" to see if they can stand being around each other for extended priods of time. In my view, if you need a test drive, you shouldn't be getting married.


Maybe a little short-sighted...

As far as an emotional attachment/relationship goes, yes, you can be pretty sure early on - face it, everyone's on their best behaviour when (to use an archaic term) dating, so everything will be hunky dory whenever you see each other.

What you don't get when dating is the real personality of a person, when they get mood swings, what they're really like 1st thing in the morning, or when they get in from a crappy day at work... Are they lazy? Are they untidy? Are they generally inconsiderate?

I guess what I'm trying to say is when you date, you see people at their best, when you live together you see them at their worst - if you can cope with both & still say you love your partner, then go for it

My wife & I have been together 22 years, lived together for 20 of those & next week sees our 17th wedding anniversary, so seems to have worked for us
it's an odd analogy  - co-habitting was not a trial-marriage for us, (if anything it was simply a prelude to marriage since we intended to marry, but not until we'd finished Uni), so I didn't see it as a test-drive. (My mum did see it as us "living in sin" which was kind of sweet in her own special way).
 
So, yeah, my wife and I had a "test drive" for a couple of years before marrying, but it was the only one we had and we didn't have alternative models lined-up for test drives should there have been any defects in build-quality or handling - sure prior to meeting each other we had take other's for a spin around the block, looked under the hood, checked the lubrication and kicked the spare tyre but beyond that no test drives were necessary.
What?
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 10:42
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
So, yeah, my wife and I had a "test drive" for a couple of years before marrying, but it was the only one we had and we didn't have alternative models lined-up for test drives should there have been any defects in build-quality or handling - sure prior to meeting each other we had take other's for a spin around the block, looked under the hood, checked the lubrication and kicked the spare tyre but beyond that no test drives were necessary.
 
Sounds like a bad 80's song. or 500.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 10:43
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
So, yeah, my wife and I had a "test drive" for a couple of years before marrying, but it was the only one we had and we didn't have alternative models lined-up for test drives should there have been any defects in build-quality or handling - sure prior to meeting each other we had take other's for a spin around the block, looked under the hood, checked the lubrication and kicked the spare tyre but beyond that no test drives were necessary.
 
Sounds like a bad 80's song. or 500.
by billy joel Ouch
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.154 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.