![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | |||
Green Shield Stamp ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 17 2009 Location: Telford, UK Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() Posted: April 14 2010 at 12:45 |
||
|
|||
Haiku
Writing a poem With seventeen syllables Is very diffic.... |
|||
![]() |
|||
npjnpj ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
![]() |
||
Well, as is well known to the electorate:
Labour helps the poor, Conservatives help the poor by helping the rich, and the LibDems....erm....
Anyway, in the end they help us and each other by helping themselves.
You should never change a ruling party because they've already stuffed their pockets.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
||
Well, you'll probably find that most of the electorate dont actually know what the parties policies are. Even after reading a manifesto, you're not likely to be any the wiser. |
|||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
npjnpj ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
![]() |
||
Parties should acknowledge that voting for them is not a support of their policies but simply the choice of the lesser of evils. |
|||
![]() |
|||
The Hemulen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
![]() |
||
Yep, I'm in the same territory on Political Compass. When I had a bash at this I unwittingly went for Green policies every time as well. I'll probably be voting Lib Dem 'cause a vote for the Greens would be utterly wasted where I am. It was almost a close run thing between Labour and Tories in 2005 here, so if there is a swing it's doubtful it'll be towards the Lib Dems, but I simply cannot bring myself to vote Labour. Of course, if we lived in a real democracy I wouldn't need to consider any of this, and simply vote for the party that best represented my views. Bah. Anyway, with that high voting power it looks like you've got a chance to make an actual difference with your vote. Which constituency are you in, if you don't mind my asking?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
RoyFairbank ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 07 2008 Location: Somewhere Status: Offline Points: 1072 |
![]() |
||
I can explain the British "Left" quite easily without looking anything up (oh wait maybe because I'm a goddamn stinking pinko...
![]() British Labour Party- Second International (from the 1890s) went reformist very quickly as did the 2I, under the influence of figures like Bernstein, and by the 1900s had resulted in Millerandism, where a Socialist Party member became part of a capitalist government. In 1914 the International fell apart as each section supported its own capitalist government in the war. Offspring include the Social Democratic Party Of Germany, founded by Karl Marx ironically, now a right wing party of course. The Socialist Party of France, the defunct Socialist Party of America, led famously by Eugene Debs, and many others besides Labour. in 1920s British sympathizers of the Russian Revolution formed the British Communist Party to fight for the principles of Socialism against the reformists Stalinist counter-revolution took over the Soviet Union and the Third International was purged of genuine socialists. The parties were then, after a brief so called "ultraleft" period, instructed to back up the Social Democrats in a policy known as the Popular Front, which prevented revolutions from taking place in Europe. in the 1930s real socialists abandoned any attempt to break the Communist Party from Stalin's grip and formed a British section of the Fourth International. In 1940, Trotsky, the FI's leader, was finally assassinated by Stalin after years of pursuit and after the murder of all his family members and comrades. Following WWII, a large section of the Fourth International decided that it should be liquidated into the Stalinist parties and third world movements. These were the Pabloites. Groups in Britain reflected Pabloism (groups like the Militant Tendency), the "State Capitalists" group led by Tony Cliff (eventually represented by Socialist Workers Party), which was quite similar, and the International Committee party of derisively named orthodox or ortho-Trotskyists whose party was the Socialist Labour League. The Socialist Labour League became the Workers Revolutionary Party in 1973, and was the largest left wing party in Britain. In 1985, it split three ways as the result of the decision by the leaders that Pabloism was correct and the party should be liquidated and become subordinated to the Stalinist parties and third world movements. This was largely because they were demoralized by the conservative turn in the 1980s. A small segment of the party, however, remained loyal to the Fourth International and was vindicated by the fall of the Soviet Union, which was declared impossible only a few years before by the demoralized leaders (Banda and Healy). They continued on as the Socialist Equaliy Party, and want to rebuild the party on firmer foundations based on internationalism. As for the Militant Tendency, it tried to rise to the top of Labour by entering into it, but its members were expelled in the 80s, ruining the stratagem, Ted Grant, it leader, died in the 2000s. The SWP is also opportunistic, teaming up with Labour politicians and promoting wide alliances. They have abandoned revolutionary change for supporting in practice Labour - they want to be a "junior partner." This is common, and there are equivalent organizations in the USA such as the International Socialist Organization, which is a middle class type protest organization. etc. ^off the top of my marvelous head and I'm an American AND most of this stuff happened way before I was born ![]() Edited by RoyFairbank - April 13 2010 at 18:59 |
|||
![]() |
|||
PsYcHoTiC_MaDmAn ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: November 11 2009 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
![]() |
||
I get shoved in over the Greens (a bit more of a left and libertarian than them however) and they got a fair few things I agree with, but as you say they are a bit anti-science (particularly their statement to "end" nuclear power) if I vote, it'd probably be the LibDems,
according to that I have the voting power of 1.220 |
|||
![]() |
|||
JJLehto ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
![]() |
||
Nah....well maybe but I think many countries may fall under that latter part. The only thing I found nutty about British politics, (and correct me if Im wrong) was that "debates" are pointless and mainly for show? Like as a test of the PM's oratory skills, and that any piece of legislature is already guaranteed since the PM's party is in the majority. I will admit, I learned about from a 75 year old conservative prof who is more of a francophile so I dont know ![]() Also this whole "snap" election thing and ready to go shadow cabinet was a little strange to me. But that was quite a tangent. Seriously, vote Scottish Independence Party! Or if I was British I'd probably just go Labour...... |
|||
![]() |
|||
The Hemulen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
![]() |
||
I agree with this to some extent. There's a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth at the prospect of a hung parliament, but it always seems to come from "the party faithful" who naturally want their party to have a powerful majority. Right now a lot of people in this country honestly don't much care for any of 'em, so a little co-operation and bargaining between the main parties certainly wouldn't go amiss. Where I disagree with you is on your suggestion (and do correct me if I'm misreading your comments) that a lack of ideological difference between the major parties is a good thing in itself. Personally I think this slavish retreat to the middle ground (and obsession with the middle classes) has been a significant contributing factor to the overall levels of political disengagement in this country. Anyone who holds strong convictions which lie either side of the moderate "consensus" view is made to feel like a fanatic. Furthermore, middle-ground consensus results in tedious, petty squabbling over which taxes should be raised and by how many quarters of half a percent. Nobody's fighting for the big issues in this election; climate change, education, public transport, foreign policy, banking reform - those are the issues I want my politicians arguing about, not f**king paltry token bribes for married couples and the like. These are the kinds of issues which should be at the heart of politics in this country. [/rant] |
|||
![]() |
|||
Green Shield Stamp ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 17 2009 Location: Telford, UK Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||
I will vote for the Labour Party.
I think the Tories will probably win the election, but they will not have an overall majority. For the kind of swing needed for an overall win, at this stage they would be expected to be getting 40% in the polls, but they are currently at 36%.
However, I don't think a hung parliament is necessarily a bad thing. There are no massive ideological differences between the main parties anymore (unlike the extreme polarisation we saw in the 1970s and 80s). Consensus politics could be an effective change for the better.
|
|||
Haiku
Writing a poem With seventeen syllables Is very diffic.... |
|||
![]() |
|||
lazland ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13895 |
![]() |
||
Absolutely right - it is one thing which the progressive left, or extreme left for that matter, have never understood, and that is the fact that a lot of working class people move to the political right during severe times. Maybe they should read their 20th century history books again! |
|||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
|||
![]() |
|||
Lizzy ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: March 15 2010 Location: Schnitzelland Status: Offline Points: 4675 |
![]() |
||
Yup, know about the Scottish and Welsh nationalists' left wing policies, not as much as I would like to though. But these parties have been on a growing trend long before the crisis, as they have a fairly long history compared to the BNP and UKIP. The economic crisis throughout Europe has mainly broght the right wingers to power, this including the right wing nationalists. Of course there are also the exceptions: first one that springs to mind is Croatia - they elected a Social Democrat president. And a bit off topic - looks like almost 70% of the Hungarian Parliament will consist of right and far-right parties. |
|||
Property of Queen Productions...
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
lazland ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13895 |
![]() |
||
Lizzy - the Welsh & Scottish Nationalists in the UK are left wing parties, both promote policies similar to those that Old Labour used to prior to Comrade Blair's election. There has been an increase in support for United Kingdom Independence Party, who want us out of Europe, and the Fascist BNP in England, which, as you suggest, is somewhat normal in times of economic trouble. However, I meant the nationalist parties of the Celtic nations, and I should have made that clearer. |
|||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
|||
![]() |
|||
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() |
||
|
|||
What?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cactus Choir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 26 2008 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
![]() |
||
Presumably they use a few more swear words though.
![]() |
|||
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"
"He's up the pub" |
|||
![]() |
|||
Jon The Impaler ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: July 10 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 42 |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
Its expensive being poor
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Jon The Impaler ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: July 10 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 42 |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
Its expensive being poor
|
|||
![]() |
|||
seventhsojourn ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 11 2009 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 4006 |
![]() |
||
^ My voter power is apparently 0.229.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
The Hemulen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
![]() |
||
Hooray for FPTP! http://www.voterpower.org.uk
|
|||
![]() |
|||
seventhsojourn ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 11 2009 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 4006 |
![]() |
||
So, a Labour candidate has been sacked for offensive tweets where he used ''unacceptable language'' to attack leading Westminster members. He also referred to the elderly as ''coffin dodgers''. My local MP initially backed him, making the excuse the guy was young and all would be ok. However as soon as the Labour Party sacked him, this same person was acclaiming this as the correct decision. Sorry, I can't trust any of these people.
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |