Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Topic: Just how religious are you? Posted: January 04 2010 at 15:27
Alright, before you cry out "not another religious poll by Mike the Atheist" ... let me explain why I created this poll.
I've been very impressed with Sam Harris' book The End of Faith. If you are familiar with the other authors who have been lumped together under the moniker "New Atheists", you'll know that they all differ to a certain degree, and Sam Harris differs from the others, too. He rejects the notion of an "Atheist movement" and is not at all happy with the label "Atheist". Today I watched a video from 2007's AAI convention, where he explains this criticism and proposes some alternative ways of dealing with the situation. Here's the video ... watch it if you're interested in an unusually critical view on "Atheism".
So: what do you think? Could we somehow manage to discuss religion without using words like "Theism", "Atheism", "Deism" etc. and respect each other? I'm willing to give it a try, and - like Sam Harris - I'll have to say this:
Not all religions, or religious people, are necessarily equally bad from the perspective of a non believer. In return, I hope that not all non-religious people are necessarily equally bad from the perspective of a believer. In the end it depends on our individual actions.
Poll choices explanations:
Fundamentalism is meant to include the notion of "giving the religion
absolute precedence over any other norm", in the case of #2 with the
exclusion of violence. This in essence means that a fundamentalist believes that his religious laws are more important than the secular laws. By "violence" I mean religiously motivated violence against unbelievers or heretics or to protect the belief. By "spirituality and mysticism" I mean non-metaphysical, introspective techniques of meditation or contemplation.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: January 04 2010 at 15:32
^^ I had already asked Dean to close the other one that I had created in December about the "Brights" and "Supers" last week. People evolve ... and I don't think another poll will be necessary. I'm just curious what people think about this different approach, avoiding the pitfalls of the word "Atheism".
Not all religions, or religious people, are necessarily equally bad from the perspective of a non believer. In return, I hope that not all non-religious people are necessarily equally bad from the perspective of a believer. In the end it depends on our individual actions.
Everyone is bad. That is the biblical doctrine of total depravity (Romans 3:23).
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: January 04 2010 at 15:43
I had been planning to make a poll that uses the "Dawkins scale" from 1 to 7 between Theism and Atheism. But it occurred to me that this idea would bias people against the concept of Atheism even more. I'm inclined to prefer the label "Not religious" to "Atheist", since it avoids the "ring" of dogma or fundamentalism
BTW: In fact this is a totally different poll than the one that I just described ... it also has seven choices, but that is merely coincidental.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.232 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.