Writing a prog rock song |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
darkshade
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
Posted: July 05 2009 at 17:46 | |
btw you will probably be met with poor or average criticism if you present your material, because "you're going in trying to write a prog song". just dont worry about it.
but anyways, good luck |
||
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 09 2007 Status: Offline Points: 610 |
Posted: July 12 2009 at 20:24 | |
Solos? That's the last thing you think about when writing a prog song
|
||
joelossia
Forum Newbie Joined: June 08 2009 Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Posted: July 15 2009 at 06:27 | |
I mean like ad-libbing and stuff+ whats rong w/solos have you not heard the cinema show by genesis- it's like 70 percent keyboard solo. |
||
Hyardacil
Forum Groupie Joined: August 04 2009 Location: Estonia Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Posted: August 04 2009 at 18:05 | |
^ he's right though. I could tell you to solo in E phrygian minor, but how would that be progressive?
... E Phyrgian minor. Hehe. Nice... I mean... Yeah... would it be progressive? |
||
"I am sitting in your eyes..."
|
||
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: September 12 2009 at 08:02 | |
ROTFLMAO...Even though I'm american, i totally am feeling this part: " Being Non-AmericanAs anyone who knows anything about anything will tell you, Americans can't make Prog Rock. With the exception of anything ever written by Dream Theater, everything to ever come out of the American Prog scene is total sh*t." Although, I can think of a few more exceptions than DT. |
||
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 28 2009 Location: Vineland, N.J. Status: Offline Points: 3126 |
Posted: September 16 2009 at 21:29 | |
One different way to compose (for me), but you might want to try it as well, is to surround yourself with nature. Composing while overlooking a landscape can be inspirational. A meadow or a field. A cemetary or just before a storm hits when the black clouds are rolling above with winds at 40 miles. Composing overlooking a church, a cathedral, or castle. I composed a lot while sitting next to a lighthouse. If you have already had the experience of playing in a wide variety of bands, worked in studios, studied with teachers and are diverse in playing different styles, this is the route to try. This way you can take everything that you have ever learned and simply not think about it. Let nature be the inspiration and all of your musical talents will unfold naturally. Many progressive rock pieces, ideas, and even epics have been written when trying this method. If it is even a method? |
||
meatal
Forum Groupie Joined: September 23 2009 Location: Kelowna Status: Offline Points: 94 |
Posted: September 26 2009 at 20:53 | |
Just a thought, for soloing in prog, if your a guitarist, listen to other instruments ( no matter style) ie: Jean luc ponty (violin) or some sax solos etc... thatmight maybe give you a different feel or outlook/inspiration to create something you normally wouldn't just coming from a guitarists viewpoint and possibly creating something new for you and a unique sound. I believe prog was and should still be expanding music not a format someone can give you.
|
||
The bitter harvest of a barren land, I'm painting pictures you don't understand.
(Fates Warning) |
||
meatal
Forum Groupie Joined: September 23 2009 Location: Kelowna Status: Offline Points: 94 |
Posted: September 29 2009 at 13:41 | |
Now just an idea, I have used in the past and there is endless possibilities. A lot (not saying all) of prog rock & metal bands when playing in odd time have a tendency to go into a time signature say it's 7/8 and stay there. What's more challenging is creating patterns/riffs( ie: 3 bars of 4/4 and then a bar of 5/4, and the next time 3 bars of 4/4 and a bar of 6/4) this just being an example the patterns are endless but do help in kinda making something new and original. Also for soloing it makes it a liitle bit more of a challenge to create something musical over top of it. No matter what scales etc... you use. Theory is useful to get you through stuff sometimes or create a certain feel/sound but it always seems more natural when you come up with something without thinking about it.
|
||
The bitter harvest of a barren land, I'm painting pictures you don't understand.
(Fates Warning) |
||
meatal
Forum Groupie Joined: September 23 2009 Location: Kelowna Status: Offline Points: 94 |
Posted: September 29 2009 at 14:15 | |
Sorry forgot might be useful. Often overlooked is poly rythmns (easy ie: playing 3/4 over 4/4) and just cause I got this on my mind, if your a guitarist look into a guitar synth, I couldn't play violin, pan flute ect.. but I could emulate them and often mixed those sounds underneath my guitar leads rather than harmonize with another guitar. And the looks of people LIVE was awsome when they heard a Hammond etc... with no one on stage playing one. Anyways hope some of this stuff is helpful for you.
|
||
The bitter harvest of a barren land, I'm painting pictures you don't understand.
(Fates Warning) |
||
Tengent
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 17 2009 Location: Evansville, IN Status: Offline Points: 119 |
Posted: October 06 2009 at 13:53 | |
I always stop and think about what emotion I want the song to convey. I then pick a desired scale to make that mood. Then I screw around with the scale and harmonies until I find something interesting.
|
||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: October 06 2009 at 18:22 | |
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
||
The Block
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 01 2009 Location: St. Alfonzo's Status: Offline Points: 924 |
Posted: October 06 2009 at 19:27 | |
|
||
|
||
IanParker
Forum Newbie Joined: October 21 2009 Location: The Woodlands Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Posted: October 21 2009 at 22:52 | |
The only problem that I have with everyone's answers is that not one person has put ANYTHING musical in their replies. Every single musician that did prog knew about Jazz theory, classical theory, and various genres. You must know the rules before you know hot to truly break them. Learn basic jazz theory and embelleshed chords(so you don't keep running into the same Root Fifth Root chords), Understand the modes(it's easier than you think), learn some classical peices. I like the comment about starting with the melody. Don't do this all the time though. YOu should really try to approach each movement from a different perspective. When you hear what usually sounds "improvised" or based on "accident", that is normally one of the many musical tools that you should learn about. For instance, there is a chord that isn't in the parent scale. There are many great devices like "modulation", "secondary dominants", "modal music", Atonal peices, ostinato. Look up these terms and see what they say. These so called accidents are usually the by-product of something purposely done. I am not saying that all of them do it. But almost all of them do. Probably with the exeption of pink floyd and King Crimson. But as far as Yes, Genesis, Camel, Gentle Giant, Mars Volta, Jethro Tull(who by the way thought it was funny to be called progressive), and most of the others, they are very learn-ed in the ways of composition. Your solos especially should really be in some kind of mode over the pedal with chord changes to help pull certain notes. I could go on all day but there is some advice. Progressive music is NOT for lazy people. Anyone who says that you don't need to know theory is telling you a lie, trust me. So get to learning and make some good music.
|
||
AnchovyRun
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 10 2009 Location: Atlantis Status: Offline Points: 437 |
Posted: October 22 2009 at 20:54 | |
I agree with fancy pants up there ^
As fun as it is to just "fool around" till you find something, if you already have something in mind like a few riffs or even just a vague idea of what you want, music theory is useful to help you to finish your riffs or phrasing.
|
||
<>< The Anchovy Run ><>
------------------------------ Caravaning For Your Convenience |
||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: October 22 2009 at 21:05 | |
Ehn. Encyclopedia Dramatica is funnier (angrier, bitter, more amoral, etc.)
|
||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Posted: October 23 2009 at 04:47 | |
Music theory is always going to be useful in writing any type of song. I have to agree with Ian Parker.
I think its quite obvious when prog has been created by musicians who understand composition on a deep level. |
||
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 09 2007 Status: Offline Points: 610 |
Posted: October 25 2009 at 19:59 | |
Nice
I'm naturally a busy thinker when it comes to music. Growing up I would hear my dad play his hammond, moog and rhodes and he would listen to jazz and fusion. I hardly liked the rock music i was hearing on tv/radio in the 80s. I wasn't really into jazz, but i liked the busy style. I liked the combination of jazz and rock though. I wasn't a fan of straight hard rock or pop rock. It has to have the busy jazz element of drumming with plenty of cymbals and busy bass playing and a nice sounding guitar which is much less dominant and more combined in a melody. Add in the keys, winds and vocals with character and you have a busy smart melody coming from jazz based ideas. Prog can only come from someone who thinks like a jazzer or a classical composer imo. The classical parts come from tthe keys usually. I just don't think it can come from someone who is into metal because the jazz guitar element goes out the window and mostly the bass and keyboard elements too(because more guitar won't accomodate the complex bass and key parts usually) Edited by PROGMONSTER2008 - October 25 2009 at 20:12 |
||
booz
Forum Newbie Joined: June 16 2009 Location: philippines Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Posted: November 03 2009 at 22:48 | |
For me theories serve as your building blocks for making music. Knowing the basics will help you produce more complex sounds.
|
||
Stay Alive
|
||
Hyardacil
Forum Groupie Joined: August 04 2009 Location: Estonia Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Posted: November 10 2009 at 12:10 | |
For me it's not a question of how to write progressive rock... it's more like the question: "How to write music?" or "How to write good music?" After all good music transcends the borders of genre and should not be limited as such. And how to write good music?
No one can answer that well enough, I think. People COULD tell you what NOT to do, I think though. |
||
"I am sitting in your eyes..."
|
||
IanParker
Forum Newbie Joined: October 21 2009 Location: The Woodlands Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Posted: November 10 2009 at 19:52 | |
Well, you see, there are musical cliche' s that you have to consider when trying to write something that will be commonly understood as "good". Just as the math and/or vibration measurements dictate to us the concepts of harmonic and melodic structure, so do the inherent progressions based on a tonal succesion's(scale's) parent chordal struture(the harmonic movement). This then is subdivided into the powerful connections of chord to chord/mode to mode, and the weaker connections, also called "cadences". So for instance when you hear the sound of a G dom7 "resolve" to a Cmaj/maj7/ect., you hear first the sound of longing, or unfinished business from the Gdom7 chord( tension) and then a feeling of rest and finality when you then play the Cmaj(resolution). So, to put it more simply, you want repeated tensions and resolutions. This is what creates that little tingly feeling when you hear a cool song. The above example is not only a musical fundemental in many respects, but it also falls into one of those(or should I say most of) the musical cliche's that progressive music combines to create more colorful and extended progressions. The reason why I mentioned that jazz plays a big part in progressive rock is not because it uses the harmonic movement and embellished chords, it is mostly because part of the mistique of jazz comes from the fact that it is always pulling the listener forward and not necessarily letting the ear rest on a chord or tone of finality.
This hasn't necessarily answered you question so I apologize.
To answer it directly,
all you need to do is look up common chord progressions and make a melody with not all notes next to eachother(diatonic/stepwise motion), and not all tones arpeggiated(skip-wise motion). That will do the trick. To write progressive music however, you must do much much more than that.
If you have further questions, I would love to answer them. That goes to anyone. I love talking theory and I also learn from others when they share the enthusiasm for music that I have.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |