Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - CD vs. high bitrate, professionally ripped MP3
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCD vs. high bitrate, professionally ripped MP3

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: How big is the difference in sound between CD and high bitrate MP3?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
9 [45.00%]
3 [15.00%]
8 [40.00%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Topic: CD vs. high bitrate, professionally ripped MP3
    Posted: September 13 2009 at 10:52
So guys (and gals) ... what do you think? There may be already similar polls, but I'm particularly interested in how such a poll will turn out in 2009 ... download stores are gaining popularity, and it seems to me like MP3 is slowly, but steadily becoming the successor of the physical formats.

BTW: Let's not include consideration of artworks, booklets or other aspects here ... I think there's another poll that I started a few months ago which specifically asks whether you would purchase MP3s instead of CDs. Let's make this poll just about the actual music.

Smile

BTW: My vote goes to: "There's no audible difference even on high-end systems". To back that up and in case some of you don't already know the study:

http://www.geocities.com/altbinariessoundsmusicclassical/mp3test.html

Even nine years ago they could not hear a difference.



Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 10:58
I went for option 1
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 11:00
^ wow, that was fast ... ClapBig smile
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 11:01
^^ Was it?Smile
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67442
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 11:02
I don't think I could hear the difference.
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 13:14
I can't hear the difference either, but I don't have a high end system. LOL
Back to Top
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 13:17
In my experience if the cd is compressed to very loud levels, the clipping increases when ripped to even the best quality mp3. If the cd is mastered to reasonable volume levels with no clipping to begin with, then there's no big difference. Perhaps none at all, I haven't really listened to two versions side by side.
Back to Top
The Sleepwalker View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 15141
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2009 at 13:28
I can't hear any difference, so I voted option one.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 05:06
I think it would be cool if those who vote here could also describe which types of systems they normally use for listening to music. As far as I'm concerned, most of the time I'll use Logitech X-530 speakers connected to the standard sound card of the computer and my Creative X-Fi mobile player with Sennheiser CX-300 in-ear headphones. But I also have a hi-fi system (Harman Kardon + Elac Speakers) and a professional audio-interface for the computer which I use to make music, connected to the hi-fi system and AKG K-512 headphones. :-) 
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 05:24
192Kbps and beyond, even on my active studio monitors, not a single discernable difference, so I voted for number 1. I don't have a high end system as such, but listening through monitors is quite revealing.
Honestly I don't think even 96kbps sound bad, although it's clearly not the same as CD quality. Although I don't need to rip at 96Kbps anymore though
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 05:35
Option number 3 - I'll give some examples...

Yesterday morning, I was playing my dad a burnt CD of Maudlin Of The Well - Part The Second through our Klipsch stereo.

(Note: these were the 263KBP MP3's, not the WAV's)
You could immediately hear the thin dynamics and hollow noise... It didn't sound like a CD, but rather a slightly muffled radio replay of the tracks.


My dad told me to download the CD quality WAV format the band had hosted on their website, and after re-burning these, you could immediately hear the difference... It wasn't really debatable.

Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 05:39
^ "a slightly muffled radio replay" ... I think it's more likely that something went wrong during burning. Can you try connecting the computer to the Klipsch?
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 05:46
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ "a slightly muffled radio replay" ... I think it's more likely that something went wrong during burning. Can you try connecting the computer to the Klipsch?


Possibly, not sure what input to use though... Its currently running through the PS3 with an Optic cable, so I'm not sure how to re-connect it.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 07:25
^ Doesn't it have line inputs, too? That would be the way to go ...

EDIT: Another thing: How did you burn the MP3s?


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - September 14 2009 at 07:27
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 07:26
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ Doesn't it have line inputs, too? That would be the way to go ...


Probably... I'll give it a proper look tomorrow, but I'm far too tired right now
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 07:32
^ of course another quick check would be to connect quality headphones to the computer and listen to the mp3s there. If they don't sound muffled, then probably something went wrong during burning.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 07:34
^^I'll try that right now, and post back after listening to a track actually
Back to Top
aapatsos View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 12:35
I have not tested that on a 'monster' machine so I can't vote... generally I would go for CDs over good quality mp3s
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2009 at 12:49
Do you think that the test would turn out that differently on a "monster" machine compared to the equipment that you normally use? 
Back to Top
Alberto Muņoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2009 at 20:17
I vote for FLAC




Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.