Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Zodiac - Cosmic Sounds for PA inclusion ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Zodiac - Cosmic Sounds for PA inclusion ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 17:30
Originally posted by akin akin wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Definitely the first - Lack of infuence/historical impact.
 
 
Iīm not criticizing the decision, but I canīt see more than 10 bands in proto-prog who were really influential to prog or had any historical impact.
then that's no reason or justification for adding another - quite the opposite.
 
Regardless of the situation in Proto Prog prior to the setting up of the Genre Teams, current policy (and the one that the current Proto Prog team adheres to), is to only add band that meet the following:
 
"The common elements in all these bands is that they developed one or more elements of Prog, and even when not completely defined as part of the genre, they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock."


Edited by Dean - July 18 2009 at 17:35
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 17:56
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

I don't know if you guys get into exotic lounge music as much as I do. If you did you would recognize the artists on this record. I like this record (Zodiac) but it isn't prog-rock or proto-prog.

This album has an all-star cast of extremely talented and creative session musicians who were good enough to help out on various exotica records and early synth novelty records when they weren't working on more standard easy listening fare.

Many of these musicians also did more serious work, but this record is typical LA styled 60s psuedo psychedelia dressed up to take advantage of a brand new and naive Southern California psuedo-psychedelic culture.



You'll have to excuse me for qouting myself, but I know a lot of people don't bother looking at the previous page.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65766
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 18:01
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 18:08
If you want some real voyueristic fun, check out what Paul Beaver thinks of George Harrison. Paul rained on many a George eulogy in the papers in the SF bay area.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65766
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 18:16
Paul Beaver...began plugging a bewildering array of patch cords into the equally bewildering panels of each module. He'd hit the keyboard and outer space, bizarre, Karlheinz Stockhausen-like sounds would emerge...Who knew what he was doing? And then he turned to us, all huddled in the control room, and said, "If you hear anything you want to use, just stop me."

"Well yes", Paul (Rothchild, the producer) said. "Actually that sound you had about three sounds back was very usable. Could you go back to that?"

"Which sound was that?" said Paul Beaver.

"That crystalline sound," Jim (Morrison) jumped in. "I liked the sound of broken glass falling from the void into creation".

"Which sound was that?" said Paul Beaver.

"A couple back from where you are now," Rothchild said.

"It reminded me of the Kabbalah", said Jim. "Kether, the I AM, creating duality out of the one. All crystalline...and pure. You know, that sound."

"Did I make a sound like that?"

"Sure", said Jim. "A couple back."

"Just go back where you were", said Rothchild.

And Paul Beaver began to unplug and replug patch cords, and twist little knobs, and strike the keyboard, which emitted strange and arcane and utterly unearthly tones that sounded nothing like the Kabbalah or Kether; the crown of the Sefiroth. None of the sounds he was creating sounded pure and crystalline. And then we realized...he couldn't get back.

Finally, with Paul Beaver ripping and tearing at his cords and twisting knobs at an increasingly furious pace, sweat dripping from his forehead, ungodly shrieks emanating from his keyboard, Rothchild shouted out, "Stop! Wait a second. Just stop there."

The possibilities were endless. The permutations were infinite. And the Beaver seemed as if he was going to try them all, as we watched, going slowly insane.

"Just stop, Paul. That's a good sound there. I think we can use that." A great sigh of relief emitted from the Doors' group mind.


Extract from "Light My Fire: My Life with the Doors" by Ray Manzarek.



Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 18:23
Well there's an interesting coincidence, cos the kitschy 'poet' on Zodiac sounds like a cross between Jim Morrison and Rod McKuen, it doesn't get more SoCal than that.
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3081
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 01:59
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

I don't know if you guys get into exotic lounge music as much as I do. If you did you would recognize the artists on this record. I like this record (Zodiac) but it isn't prog-rock or proto-prog.

This album has an all-star cast of extremely talented and creative session musicians who were good enough to help out on various exotica records and early synth novelty records when they weren't working on more standard easy listening fare.

Many of these musicians also did more serious work, but this record is typical LA styled 60s psuedo psychedelia dressed up to take advantage of a brand new and naive Southern California psuedo-psychedelic culture.



You'll have to excuse me for qouting myself, but I know a lot of people don't bother looking at the previous page.
 
So does it matter that itīs a "fake" project?
 
Let me take this down to an earthly level. Personally I donīt care who contributed to the recordings or what the history of this album is ( Iīll leave that for my review). I listen with my ears without prejudice ( when I evaluate artists) and then judge. And I hear lots of progressive/ psych elements on this album. Maybe they are not suited for proto-prog as the admin team decided but I really do believe they should be represented on PA. Fake session group or not. Iīm really happy that Uwe decided to re-evaluate. If they donīt get in they donīt get in. I wonīt be happy about the decision but then thatīs it. But I would like it tried in both psych and VA: Concept albums before I rest my case. I hope thatīs acceptableSmile.
Back to Top
akin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 10:38
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by akin akin wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Definitely the first - Lack of infuence/historical impact.
 
 
Iīm not criticizing the decision, but I canīt see more than 10 bands in proto-prog who were really influential to prog or had any historical impact.
then that's no reason or justification for adding another - quite the opposite.
 
Regardless of the situation in Proto Prog prior to the setting up of the Genre Teams, current policy (and the one that the current Proto Prog team adheres to), is to only add band that meet the following:
 
"The common elements in all these bands is that they developed one or more elements of Prog, and even when not completely defined as part of the genre, they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock."
 
If it is so, it has nothing to do with influence or historical impact. This definition says that the band shares some elements with prog and, because of that, though not considered prog, they were added because their existence is considered an important stage of development of prog. I canīt read anywhere that the band must have historical impact or be influential to other bands, just that the collective existence of them was important to the evolution of the prog genre.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 11:16
Originally posted by akin akin wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by akin akin wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Definitely the first - Lack of infuence/historical impact.
 
 
Iīm not criticizing the decision, but I canīt see more than 10 bands in proto-prog who were really influential to prog or had any historical impact.
then that's no reason or justification for adding another - quite the opposite.
 
Regardless of the situation in Proto Prog prior to the setting up of the Genre Teams, current policy (and the one that the current Proto Prog team adheres to), is to only add band that meet the following:
 
"The common elements in all these bands is that they developed one or more elements of Prog, and even when not completely defined as part of the genre, they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock."
 
If it is so, it has nothing to do with influence or historical impact. This definition says that the band shares some elements with prog and, because of that, though not considered prog, they were added because their existence is considered an important stage of development of prog. I canīt read anywhere that the band must have historical impact or be influential to other bands, just that the collective existence of them was important to the evolution of the prog genre.
It does not come any clearer than:
"...they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock"
 
Simply having some of the component parts or being around at the same time is just not enough, they have to so some linearity and continuity to the Progressive Rock movement to be part of the development, and this album cannot demonstrate that. 
 
Similarly the use of the Moog is not enough - many albums around that time can claim to be one of the earliest uses of Electronic Synthesis to create music, but use of a particular instrument is not in itself germane to the development of Progressive Rock.


Edited by Dean - July 19 2009 at 11:17
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 11:56
Sorry Akin, but this record has nothing to do with prog-rock in any form.

Do you realize how many early synth exotica records we would have to add if this one gets in.

When it comes to early synth exotica, far more of an influence on prog-rock would be Dick Hyman's 'Moog' which contains 'Minataur', one of the first synth songs to be played on commercial radio.

Dick Hyman's use of the synth was a big influence on Keith Emerson who quotes from The Minataur during his synth break on ELP live.

Before I added this kitschy record I would add Hyman, Les Baxter, Martin Denny and Tartaglia first for being far more truly progressive and more of an influence on the development of prog-rock.

Edited by Easy Money - July 19 2009 at 12:05
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 16:09
I still fail to see how this album isn't progressive.  Conceptucal, synths, the instrumentation....but whatever
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 17:07
^ I never said it wasn't progressive. We are discussing whether or not this album fits the progarchives definition of proto-prog. If it does, then I know quite a few albums that should be added way ahead of this one, read the above posts for more related info.
Back to Top
akin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 21:58
Well, I never stated that they deserved to be added because of early use of moog, because synth exotica means nothing to prog. In fact, synthesizers became a staple for prog bands, but they were late in adopting the synths, except the mellotron and, arguably, the Hammond Organ, which can be considered a synthesizer. After the impact of Theremin in Beach Boys "Good Vibrations" and the presentation of Moog Synthesizer during the Monterey Pop Festival, many bands adopted the synthesizers, but the forerunners where bands not related to prog, like Byrds, Monkees and even Beatles and Stones. If it was to choose one album representative of the synth exotica / electronic / advanced production, it should be Joe Meekīs I Hear a New World. This was the big deal about electronics, synths, production.
 
In fact, Zodiac is more interesting for being a full concept album, blends poetry and narration with music, uses advanced instrumentation and the music has some touches of classical and jazz.
 
The problem with it all may lie on the Proto Prog category, but if it is so, it is the biggest blunder of PA. Under the guidelines you use to deny Zodiac addition, more than half of the bands listed under Proto Prog should have been denied as well. I understand that most of those bands were added before the new policies, but they make the category completely misleading and a change is needed. Of course there are other "wrong" additions that cannot be removed because of the policies of the site, but usually they are the minority. With Proto Prog, it seems to be exactly the opposite. If influence is so important, no band should be added to the category anymore, because it should be either widely recognized and, consequently already added or they are not important.
 
How can someone explain how Jefferson Airplane was prog and influential and Grateful Dead not, if Grateful Dead was a huge influence even to Jefferson Airplane? How can one justify Tomorrow, Quiet World, Touch, Giles, Giles & Fripp, Sweet**ter, Andromeda etc and not the hundreds of obscure psych/art pop bands, once Tomorrow, Quiet World, Touch, GG&F, Sweet**ter, Andromeda are all more obscure than hundreds of psych/ art pop bands (and none of them have "more elements" than the others, otherwise they would be placed in full prog genres)?
 
So my concern is with proto prog. Forget about Zodiac. Proto Prog is useless and misleading to anyone who wants to learn more about the origins of prog rock, this is the whole problem.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65766
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2009 at 22:26
   ^ I disagree --  when I began rediscovering Prog, the 'proto-prog' thing seemed quite right and shined a little light on history, how prog had not spontaneously mutated (except on a few key albums, some considered protoprog), and that in fact the whole notion of certain prototypes for what came later might be of some interest to a fan.. it certainly was for me.

Protoprog doesn't exist as a sovereign genre, it is an idea, a way to connect the musical, historical and cultural dots and to determine how those things began vining outward in multiple directions.  In fact real proto-progressive rock music is a far larger arena, as evidenced in this thread--  i.e. the Beach Boys would be an excellent addition, in fact IMO they are criminally under-acknowledged for their contributions to the Art Rock scenes. 

As for Jefferson Airplane, there is little doubt as to the influence their sound, textures, artistry, and compositions had on popular music at the time.  It was huge, bigger than it seems now, but if you watch some of the old footage of them in concert round about '66/'67, you see how new that was and how attractive and large sound they'd achieved.  The Dead were also progressive and I wouldn't mind seeing them here either.  Part of the issue is that it was such a creative period it's challenging to separate the early art rock from simply inventive pop music - in fact some protoprog was exactly that, which is why it can't be seen as a genre but rather music of that era most important to prog.





Edited by Atavachron - July 19 2009 at 22:27
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10726
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 03:48
Hi Akin, I agree that there are some flaws in the proto section, that's why I've volunteered to help out and make sure that more bands that don't belong don't get added. Sorry, but I don't have the authority to remove any bands, otherwise I would go through and check the validity of every band in there.

it isn't up to you or I to decide these things though, it's a team effort, and the results of a team effort are never totally satisfying to all team members.
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3081
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 12:12
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ I never said it wasn't progressive. We are discussing whether or not this album fits the progarchives definition of proto-prog. If it does, then I know quite a few albums that should be added way ahead of this one, read the above posts for more related info.
 
I actually thought that we didnīt discuss their place in Proto-prog anymore as theyīve been clearly rejected. But as they were not rejected in Psych but only moved to Proto-prog thereīs still a chance there. So if we should keep discussing the subject letīs talk about their possible inclusion in Psych or VA: Concept albums. Letīs leave the proto-thing alone in this thread and take that discussion in Akinīs thread: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58666
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 12:30
Originally posted by UMUR UMUR wrote:

...But as they were not rejected in Psych but only moved to Proto-prog thereīs still a chance there. So if we should keep discussing the subject letīs talk about their possible inclusion in Psych or VA: Concept albums.
 
Hi Umur, I fear we can't add this artist to Psych Prog genre, as it is from the year 1967.. (pre-1969 bands to proto)
It's a good album, but if it doesn't find a place here, don't be sad Umur! Smile
From the solutions above, I would suggest focusing to swapping & disgesting ideas concerning Various Arist choice, if there are argument agains proto inclusion.
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3081
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 14:11

Ok then. Any suggestions as to who I should contact to get The Zodiac evaluated for VA: Concept albums?

Back to Top
Captain Capricorn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 21 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1085
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 14:23
The Zodiac... is a collection of pieces by moog/mellotron composer Mort Garson who, IMO, would fit better in electronic rather than proto or psych ...It seems to me that the best chance The Zodiac... has of making it into the archives is by riding in on the coattails of Garson Wink 

Edited by Captain Capricorn - July 20 2009 at 14:25
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 15:26
Originally posted by UMUR UMUR wrote:

Ok then. Any suggestions as to who I should contact to get The Zodiac evaluated for VA: Concept albums?

 
Me.
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.