Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Do you consider the Abbey Road Medleys as one song
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDo you consider the Abbey Road Medleys as one song

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
ModernRocker79 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 62
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Do you consider the Abbey Road Medleys as one song
    Posted: February 20 2009 at 16:11
Do you consider the Abbey Road Medleys as one song?
 
The Abbey Road Medleys is a song cycle suite of several short songs designed as a single entity in medley form. It was planned and some of the melodies are repeated. So to me it's one song. Many people write songs in fragments and make it a whole song. It was designed to be one song. It's form is unusual.
 
 
 
Back to Top
BroSpence View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2009 at 17:54
I consider it as one medley.
Back to Top
DamoXt7942 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar

Joined: October 15 2008
Location: Okayama, Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2009 at 18:02
I agree with you.
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2009 at 19:01
Absolutely 100% without a doubt, one song. Repeating theme, it flows, and prog bands like Transatlantic consider it one song (that's what Suite Charlotte Pike was modeled after).

Yes, The Beatles made a 16-minute song.Thumbs Up

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2009 at 19:02
^definitely.
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2009 at 18:19
sorry, but I had to do this before I sign out.
It would kill me to go to bed with 499 posts instead of 500.

Here we go...

POST 500!
Yaaaay!!

Anyway, on the topic of this discussion, even John Lennon considers it one song.
It is definitely one song, though straight rock enthusiasts like to call it different songs.



Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
TheCaptain View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2009 at 18:51
Yes. It's one song for all the reasons already stated.
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2009 at 21:47

I don't consider it one song but I adore all the songs flowing into each other so much.

 
I'm going to stand in my little corner now.

Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2009 at 21:55
Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

I don't consider it one song but I adore all the songs flowing into each other so much.
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2009 at 14:51
Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

I don't consider it one song but I adore all the songs flowing into each other so much.

 
I'm going to stand in my little corner now.


How does it flow, but still isn't one song? It has a repeating theme as well.

What is the definition of 'song' in your mind if flowing without breaks,  repeating music, and repeating lyrical themes isn't enough?

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2009 at 00:08

^I see it as more of a suite. For one thing, the songs do flow, but there are several breaks in the music. "You Never Give me Your Money" fades out, and there's a short break between that and "Sun King". Then there's a break between "She Came in through the Bathroom Window" and "Golden Slumbers". Besides, there's quite a few songs with unrelated musical ideas thrown in there. It doesn't mean I don't enjoy it less, Once the frantic percussion begins at the end of "Polythene Pam" comes in, I get terribly excited. It's just wonderful. And then when the trumpets play the melody in "Carry that Weight", it's just awesome.

I don't think of 6DOIT as one song either, and it flows together much better than side 2 of Abbey Road.

Back to Top
mrcozdude View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2009 at 01:28
Separate songs (in a medley) for me.

For me a "usual" song doesn't repeat music themes so quickly after one another and though each song being short quite short,They all take on there own persona.

And I guess seeing there separate tracks that probably means there indented to be separate.
Back to Top
ModernRocker79 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 62
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2009 at 09:20
Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

^I see it as more of a suite. For one thing, the songs do flow, but there are several breaks in the music. "You Never Give me Your Money" fades out, and there's a short break between that and "Sun King". Then there's a break between "She Came in through the Bathroom Window" and "Golden Slumbers". Besides, there's quite a few songs with unrelated musical ideas thrown in there. It doesn't mean I don't enjoy it less, Once the frantic percussion begins at the end of "Polythene Pam" comes in, I get terribly excited. It's just wonderful. And then when the trumpets play the melody in "Carry that Weight", it's just awesome.

I don't think of 6DOIT as one song either, and it flows together much better than side 2 of Abbey Road.
 

Well "You Never Give Me Your Money" was linked with "Sun King" on purpose by Paul. 

 
"McCartney was playing with loops again and assembled a collection of Moog and other sounds for use on the album. “Paul took a plastic bag containing a dozen loose strands of mono tape into Abbey Road,” writes Beatles’ archivist Mark Lewisohn, “where—together with the production staff—he spent the afternoon in the studio three control room transferring the best of these onto professional four-track tape. The effects—sounding like bells, birds, bubbles and crickets chirping allowed for a perfect cross fade in the medley from Sun King into You Never Give Me Your Money".
 
 
Electronic Music and the Beatles by Thom Holmes

 

 

 

 

Back to Top
DJPuffyLemon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2008
Location: L
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2009 at 10:26
i always considered them separate songs too
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2009 at 19:21
I usually consider albums a unitary peice of work if it's a band like this, so most certainly yes.
Back to Top
AlanD View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 28 2008
Location: Portsmouth
Status: Offline
Points: 135
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2009 at 06:15
No, I consider it a song cycle.
AlanD
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2009 at 06:55
Originally posted by ModernRocker79 ModernRocker79 wrote:

Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

^I see it as more of a suite. For one thing, the songs do flow, but there are several breaks in the music. "You Never Give me Your Money" fades out, and there's a short break between that and "Sun King". Then there's a break between "She Came in through the Bathroom Window" and "Golden Slumbers". Besides, there's quite a few songs with unrelated musical ideas thrown in there. It doesn't mean I don't enjoy it less, Once the frantic percussion begins at the end of "Polythene Pam" comes in, I get terribly excited. It's just wonderful. And then when the trumpets play the melody in "Carry that Weight", it's just awesome.

I don't think of 6DOIT as one song either, and it flows together much better than side 2 of Abbey Road.
 

Well "You Never Give Me Your Money" was linked with "Sun King" on purpose by Paul. 

 
"McCartney was playing with loops again and assembled a collection of Moog and other sounds for use on the album. “Paul took a plastic bag containing a dozen loose strands of mono tape into Abbey Road,” writes Beatles’ archivist Mark Lewisohn, “where—together with the production staff—he spent the afternoon in the studio three control room transferring the best of these onto professional four-track tape. The effects—sounding like bells, birds, bubbles and crickets chirping allowed for a perfect cross fade in the medley from Sun King into You Never Give Me Your Money".
 
 
Electronic Music and the Beatles by Thom Holmes

 

 

Call me Mr Picky but that's the wrong way round.
 
Here's a bit of trivia - Her Majesty was originally supposed to be in the middle - the opening guitar chord is where it was edited from either Mean Mr Mustard or Polythene Pam (I can never remember which).
Back to Top
Odisseos View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2009
Location: Miami
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 18 2009 at 09:15
Separate all tracks and they are nothing. But togheter and in the final order they work and make a wonderful collage, pure genius. It doesn't matter when, how  and for what you write a suit, the important thing is what you listen at the end. That is music.
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2009 at 08:43
A bunch of separate songs that fit toghter.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 13 2009 at 07:26
sure they are separate songs...  but ones that should be listened to as if they were just one song.

same as side 1 of ELO's On the Third Day... though that was musically more connected as one long song.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.137 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.