Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Will pop music become prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWill pop music become prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:31
Jplanet- There are no insults going on here. I thought that's what discussion forums were for- to discuss.

Ivan- pop is a shortening of popular- music that the masses like, purchase and relish.

So discuss on and Merry Christmas to all.
Back to Top
jplanet View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:33
Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:

Jplanet- There are no insults going on here. I thought that's what discussion forums were for- to discuss....


Acknowledgment posted simultaneously as your post...Not only will I not defend New Prog, but I will defend its detractors here to the utter end!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:37
^ There's good and bad in all things - if Radiohead, Mansun or Muse are labelled New Prog (which in some quarters they are) then "All Hail New Prog!" I say Big smile
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:42
Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:


Ivan- pop is a shortening of popular- music that the masses like, purchase and relish.

 
 
Since the end of the early 60's POP is considered a specific genre, with an own structure....Or do you believe that if a jazz album swells 20'000,000 copies will cease to be Jazz to become POP?
 
Or if 10'000,000 persons bought Seven (The clñassical album of Tony Banks) it would become instantly POP?
 
In the same way if The Lamb would had sold 50'000,000 copies it would never had became POP, because it has a tortally different structure and influences.
 
POP may have been born as a short term for popular, but since three or four decades, the term has a completely different meaning that covers the conservative evolution of Rock.
 
If you don't believe Wikipedia or The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians from where the POP definition was taken, you will probably believe a prog artist:
 
Quote

What is progressive rock ?


"It is music that does progress. It takes an idea and developes it, rather than just repeat it. Pop songs are about repetition and riffs and simplicity. Progressive music takes a riff, turns it inside out, plays it upside down and the other way around, and explores its potential."


Keith Emerson

He clearly bases his definition of Progressive Rock in it's differences with POP, so it's obvious for almost anybody.
 
Merry Christmas also. LOL
 
Iván
 


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 08 2008 at 18:49
            
Back to Top
jplanet View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:43
I was wondering if Radiohead and Muse would count -- I suppose they are, given the definition...


Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:46

Well, by defenition Country, Metal, Hip-Hop, Alternative, R&B, Prog, Blues, and Reggae are all pop music. Then there's classical and traditional music...


Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:46
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ There's good and bad in all things - if Radiohead, Mansun or Muse are labelled New Prog (which in some quarters they are) then "All Hail New Prog!" I say Big smile


amen ...beats the hell out of the regressive sh*t any day... been there ...heard that.. done better.. by better groups.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:50
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:


Ivan- pop is a shortening of popular- music that the masses like, purchase and relish.

 
 
Since the end of the early 60's POP is considered a specific genre, with an own structure....Or do you believe that if a jazz album swells 20'000,000 copies will cease to be Jazz to become POP?
 
Or if 10'000,000 persons bought Seven (The clñassical album of Tony Banks) it would become instantly POP?
 
In the same way if The Lamb would had sold 50'000,000 copies it would never had became POP, because it has a tortally different structure and influences.
 
POP may have been born as a short term for popular, but since three or four decades, the term has a completely different meaning that covers the conservative evolution of Rock.
 
Merry Christmas also. LOL
 
Iván
 

No Ivan- it would not become pop it would be popular.

Anyway, I am just stirring the pot here. I agree entirely that pop is based on certain compositional rules. Rules that I find uneventful and boring- how many times can you listen to a I IV V progression.

But there are loads of examples where prog has been popular- that is all.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 18:57
Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:


Ivan- pop is a shortening of popular- music that the masses like, purchase and relish.

 
 
Since the end of the early 60's POP is considered a specific genre, with an own structure....Or do you believe that if a jazz album swells 20'000,000 copies will cease to be Jazz to become POP?
 
Or if 10'000,000 persons bought Seven (The clñassical album of Tony Banks) it would become instantly POP?
 
In the same way if The Lamb would had sold 50'000,000 copies it would never had became POP, because it has a tortally different structure and influences.
 
POP may have been born as a short term for popular, but since three or four decades, the term has a completely different meaning that covers the conservative evolution of Rock.
 
Merry Christmas also. LOL
 
Iván
 

No Ivan- it would not become pop it would be popular.

Anyway, I am just stirring the pot here. I agree entirely that pop is based on certain compositional rules. Rules that I find uneventful and boring- how many times can you listen to a I IV V progression.

But there are loads of examples where prog has been popular- that is all.


and when you have pop songs...err... the worst dirges of pop music to some... LOVE songs done in "5/4, then 4/4, to 7/8 and ending in 5/8

you have .. prog pop heaven. LOL


Edited by micky - December 08 2008 at 18:58
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
valravennz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:01
Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them???

"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp


Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:02
Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:


No Ivan- it would not become pop it would be popular
 
Clap In the same way Prog would become Popular and not POP

Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:


Anyway, I am just stirring the pot here. I agree entirely that pop is based on certain compositional rules. Rules that I find uneventful and boring- how many times can you listen to a I IV V progression.
 
I agree, but MOST POP is even less interesting than the classic I-IV-V Progression of Rock & Roll, because they isnsit in the boring formula of a catchy chorus and predicatble verse..

Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:

But there are loads of examples where prog has been popular- that is all.
 
Of course, if you seen Yes at QPR, is amazing the number of fans they had in 1974 or Kansas and of course Pink Floyd, they were Popular denying it would be silly, but they appeared partly as a reaction to POP, this musicians wanted to do something transcendental, that most POP artists don't care about.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 08 2008 at 19:03
            
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65269
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:04
if the question is "will Prog become popular?", sure there's always a chance that prog rock could see some big chart success as it did in the early 70s (Passion Play #1 on US charts)..  but if the question is will Pop become Prog, then no, I don't see that happening   ..pop is what it is in all its occasional glory, and will retain its traits of brevity, digestibility, and melodic appeal

 
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:05
Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them???



rock... R n B... country....  just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog.  This site has answered that definitively...answered it  in the negative.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Proggg View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:24
Pop music becoming prog = Wishful thinking/utter delusion
A windstorm dropped a bird from the sky
It fell to the ground and it's wings broke and died
But when the time got by, back to sky it flied cause the wings healed in time and the bird was I-Wintersun
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:26

Maybe I'm crazy, but didn't pop music (i.e., rock) become prog once already?  No reason it couldn't happen again.

Back to Top
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:34
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

if the question is "will Prog become popular?", sure there's always a chance that prog rock could see some big chart success as it did in the early 70s (Passion Play #1 on US charts)..  but if the question is will Pop become Prog, then no, I don't see that happening   ..pop is what it is in all its occasional glory, and will retain its traits of brevity, digestibility, and melodic appeal

 

Very well put... Sums up the argument nicely.

Ivan- I've got Yes at QPR. And this is after Tales where they fell from grace with the music rags.. and still popular. In my opinion it could have been their greatest historical recording- except for the extremely bad mixing.
Back on topic. That quote of Emersons you put up sums up why prog will never be popular- who in the world wants to invest time and energy trying to understand something that makes absolutely no sense! And that is your average "Turn on the radio while I do the housework, dear" listener.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:44
Originally posted by <SPAN =msgSidePro id=userPro3067239 title=View Drop Down =showDropDown'userPro3067239', 'proMenu3067239', 160, 0;>cobb2 </SPAN> cobb2 wrote:

 

Ivan- I've got Yes at QPR. And this is after Tales where they fell from grace with the music rags.. and still popular. In my opinion it could have been their greatest historical recording- except for the extremely bad mixing.
 
Excellent tape, Patrick Moraz is amazing, butt really, the mixing is terrible.
 
 
 
Originally posted by <SPAN =msgSidePro id=userPro3067239 title=View Drop Down =showDropDown'userPro3067239', 'proMenu3067239', 160, 0;>cobb2 </SPAN> cobb2 wrote:

Back on topic. That quote of Emersons you put up sums up why prog will never be popular- who in the world wants to invest time and energy trying to understand something that makes absolutely no sense! And that is your average "Turn on the radio while I do the housework, dear" listener.
 
Agree with you except for one thing,Prog makes sense, the problem is people want their music alredy chewed so they don't have to put any effort of concentration.
 
The average Joe will normally never like Prog, but not his fault, the record industry manipulates the music, radios and magazines  so only what is profitable for them reaches the top, and Prog is not preciselty their best investmen.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 08 2008 at 19:45
            
Back to Top
valravennz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:45
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them???



rock... R n B... country....  just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog.  This site has answered that definitively...answered it  in the negative.
 
Micky - No - it does not have to ROCK to be prog. Perhaps I am being too simplistic in my understanding of what should not be regarded as prog music. I always understood Prog music to contain some elements of complexity such as "odd"  time signatures that is not seen in the usual Pop composition. I don't want to get too far out of my depth here, but I think most of what is regarded as  Pop music is too simple a music form to be regarded as prog music as I understand it.Smile

"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp


Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:50
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them???



rock... R n B... country....  just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog.  This site has answered that definitively...answered it  in the negative.


We might want to drop the "rock" from "your ultimate prog rock resource" in the masthead. I'd prefer it to read "your ultimate progressive music resource".  Then we could put that one to bed.  I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have to let all of the riff-raff into the room. LOL  But I applaud the site for not being too narrow of mind.  I've seen a lot of controversial additions since I've joined and I remain in favor of a bigger tent when it comes to what is included.  Still there will be endless battles here regarding where the line is drawn.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:56
The musical traits that describe Prog are not unique to the genre, nor are they cast in stone. Prog frequently "borrows" from other genres and in return other genres employ some of the developments in musical styles that Prog pioneered.
 
on the plus side -
Pop evolves -  it always has done - not every band, but a fair number have progressed and a few have even crossed-over into Prog - (this is a "good thing") - but even those bands and artists who don't make the complete transition make worthwhile music that improves what "Pop"
 
on the negative side -
Pop for one has proven time and time again that it can adopt and adapt anything - take the current trend of Pop Classical like Vanessa Mae, Bond and Il Divo - it's a hideous idea with horrendous results - yet still they sell like hot cakes - once that's fallen out of vogue they'll turn their attention to another genre to plunder ... now imagine Nous Sommes du Soleil trimmed to a nice radio friendly, accessible 3 minutes and given a good solid repetitive 4/4 beat - bet you're glad Simon Cowell isn't a Prog fan now...
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.