Gibson or Epiphone guitar?? |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |||
Finnforest
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Offline Points: 16913 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 21:26 | ||
I am no guitar expert, but I've owned and played a Les Paul for over 20 years now. I've also played lots of friends guitars and all I can offer is to say.....nothin sounds like a Les to my ears.
As I'm getting older playing the slab for long periods can wear out my shoulders, and I've started to appreciate the lighter weight of the SG. But if that's not a concern, go with an old Les. |
|||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 22:20 | ||
I should mention $300 CAD. I've used a Peavey Studio Chorus 210 (good until you hear yourself play a real good amp), a Vox VR30R - a hybrid amp (Tube power amp), which I hated to have to sell to get my current one - Traynor YVC50. I also have a Roland Micro Cube. If you find one, buy it. Discontinued, but not because of quality issues. The lineout allows you to plug it into your own amp (for the effects and amp models) or a PA. And it sounds great by itself and loud for 2 watts. I've played through a Peavey 50/410, which is a great value, if you can't afford a Fender Bassman. Both Vox & Line 6 have great amp modeling amps. I find these amps easier to work than the multieffect/amp modelers. Too often, the 120 page booklet gathers dust and I just end up using them for the effects instead of using stomp pedals. I had a Boss GT6, which I loved. Traded it for the YCV50. But I miss the GT6. |
|||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
|||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 23:26 | ||
I would also recommend an Epiphone over a Gibson for the original poster's requirements.
Get one used, and you will have zero concern over resale value, collectible, etc. If you take good care of it, you can always sell it for the exact same price you bought it for when/if you feel like you are ready to upgrade. I think it's good advice to say, wait until you start to develop your sound and style before you invest thousands of dollars into your guitar. You never know - you might turn out to be a Strat guy, or more into the feel of a Paul Reed Smith or an Ibanez down the road. (All of which can be obtained cheaper than a Les Paul). You can get quite far with a very inexpensive guitar. There are guitarists on tour right now with very expensive guitars, and end up sounding like mush through the P.A.'s at the venues they're playing, yet there are kids on YouTube blowing everybody's minds with their $200 Squire Strats. |
|||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 05:57 | ||
Well, I just ordered a Variax 700 ... as soon as it arrives, I'll let you know how it sounds, especially the Les Paul models:
Edited by Mr ProgFreak - November 29 2008 at 05:58 |
|||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 09:37 | ||
the Epiphone is not the same as a Gibson - different wood, different maker, different country, different animal, different everything! putting in SD's will make it sound 90% Epiphone....
brands that are "name" brands have earned those good names for good reasons!
|
|||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
|||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 12:10 | ||
^ but Epiphone became famous for copying the Gibson Les Paul. In the 90s I was in a band, and the other guitarist played one of those cheap copies because he couldn't afford a real Gibson. Since then the qualities of the Epiphone guitars has greatly improved, and although I don't know first hand I would agree that getting a cheap Epiphone Les Paul and then improving the pickups could be a good strategy.
Another way to go would be LTD/ESP: http://www.espguitars.com/guitars_ec.html Definitely a much more modern guitar, but with the looks of a Les Paul. |
|||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 19:56 | ||
The singlecut Paul Reed Smith SE's are also a great way to get a good LP-style guitar at a very good price...
|
|||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: November 30 2008 at 03:07 | ||
One important thing to consider is the type of the neck/fretboard. If you get a Gibson/Epiphone you'll typically get a massive neck (quite thick) with a low radius, short scale and 22 medium frets. If you get an ESP/LTD you can also opt for a much more modern neck (thinner) with 24 (extra) jumbo frets and higher radius. That can make quite a difference, if you're into high speed licks. Ok, if you consider a Gibson/Epiphone you're probably not into shredding ...
|
|||
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 24 2007 Location: Ukraine Status: Offline Points: 25210 |
Posted: November 30 2008 at 04:38 | ||
^Actually, no. the necks on ESP/LTD Eclipse guitars are 12 inch radius, exactly the same as Gibson.
And ESP use standard jumbo frets, the "XJumbo" terminology they use is a misnomer. The height of the fretwire ESP is just a tad smaller than Dunlop 6100s and is essentially about the same size as the jumbo frets Jackson Guitars or Ibanez use for their guitars. A lot of the extra speed I feel in the Eclipse neck over the Gibson neck, is as you said, the neck profile itself, which is shallower than the typical Gibson profile. The Eclipse range is more the 'rhythm player' range of ESP guitars, with the super strat designs having slightly faster necks and more catered to the technical player. And the ESP model only has 22 frets, instead of the LTD models 24 frets. But since ESPs are generally higher quality than LTD anyway, I would rather sacrifice 2 frets for the sake of a better guitar if I could afford it. That said, high end LTDs aren't exactly low quality Edited by HughesJB4 - November 30 2008 at 04:40 |
|||
|
|||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: November 30 2008 at 04:47 | ||
^ thanks for the info ... LTD/ESP don't mention the radius on their website, and I simply assumed from the rest of the specs that the radius would be higher ...
In any case, I'd say that LTD/ESP offers a nice opportunity to get a guitar that looks like a vintage Gibson Les Paul but plays like a modern guitar. You can even get them with active pickups ... |
|||
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 24 2007 Location: Ukraine Status: Offline Points: 25210 |
Posted: November 30 2008 at 04:52 | ||
^Actually, yes, the annoying thing is, they only list the fretboard radius on the Japanese site for some reason
Although you are able to get the list of more detailed specs if you contact ESP by email and ask for it too, for those of you who don't want to be confused on the Japanese ESP site And indeed, ESP Eclipse guitars are a great way to get into the Les Paul shape, and with the Japanese made ESPs, the quality is far more consistent than Gibson nowadays, and even the highest end ESP Eclipse, which has even better specifications and higher quality than a Les Paul Standard, costs 25-35 per cent less in most markets. |
|||
|
|||
Philéas
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
Posted: November 30 2008 at 14:09 | ||
Most probably. |
|||
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 02 2006 Location: Methil Republic Status: Offline Points: 1594 |
Posted: December 11 2008 at 15:55 | ||
I have an Epiphone Les Paul Gothic. It's the Korean version and cost me abut £200 a few years ago.
It's thinner than a Gibson LP so it's much lighter. I've played a couple of Gibson LPs and the Epi is just as easy to play although the sound is different (a hint of SG maybe, because of the thinner body and lack of a maple top). I've been thinking about upgrading the pickups but that's more due to my urge to tinker than any deficiencies in how the guitar sounds.
I've seen Epi LP Gothics for as little as £165 new but they're made in China now and I don't know how they compare to the Korean version.
|
|||
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: December 11 2008 at 18:27 | ||
Are you sure ? Both share mahogany as the body's wood. The Gibson has a carved Maple top. The Epi has a Set mahogany neck, the Gibson - One-piece mahogany neck. The gibson has an ebony fretboard, the Epi, Rosewood. Both share the gold hardware,Tune-o-matic bridge with stopbar tailpiece,Body, neck and headstock binding. The Gibson has 490R and 498T humbuckers, the Epi - 2 Alnico Classic humbuckers. Now there is no denying some difference in the craftmanship, but there is nothing that would create a chasm in sound quality (unstable tuning pegs, bad frets etc). So, in a blind listening test, both guitars using the same PUPs , most would not hear a difference. There is one, for sure, or people wouldn't pay extra for the Gibson, and it wouldn't keep its' value as well. But the price is $3899 for the Gibson, and $799 for the Epi, (based on the listings at the moment on Musicians friend) Factor in the upgraded PUPs, and if you don't care about its' collectability, you have a comparable guitar. P.S. Collectibility does not automatically equal quality. 70s & early 80s Gibson Les Pauls were a hit & miss proposition. The good ones were great, the bad ones were terrible. They hadn't established the quality controls they now have. In comparison, same period Matsomuko brands like Vantage & Aria were well built and consistently good quality guitars, great actually if you know the the Aria Pro II line. Once they moved the production out of Japan, though, the quality came down, while Gibson's was going up. So if you find an Aria, Aria Pro II, or Vantage made in Japan, you will be surprised by the excellent price to quality ratio. And as long as you don't have the ego need for "brand" names, you'll find yourself with a guitar that is every bit as good as anything made in America, apart from the high end Boutique or Custom made guitars. |
|||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
|||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: December 21 2008 at 01:03 | ||
If you're short on cash, I don't think Gibson is the way to go. They are a littler like Fender in that the only way you're gonna get truly good-quality sound out of their products, you're gonna have to pay $900+.
It's just my opinion, of course.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |