![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Author | |||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() Posted: July 31 2008 at 21:32 |
||
Same idea as the top song list. Lists of anywhere from 25-100 albums will be accepted. Any genre goes, but nothing listed on PA (except in proto/related).
PM me your lists when you finish. Please use text format (not RYM), and list albums starting with #1 and then going down (do not do reverse order). Commence. Lists are due September 15, 2008. NOTE: For the purposes of this list, John Zorn does not count as prog (as in, he can be included on the lists). While he is listed under RIO/Avant prog, even the PA bio admits he is not really a prog artist. Neither does Miles Davis, who will shortly be added to the site, since he was not on the site before this contest started. And, once again, Proto/Related is not prog. Note2: Classical works count as well, even if they came before the time of recording music. Just list them as Composer - Name of Work (e.g. Igor Stravinsky - The Rite of Spring). Even if there are recorded versions since then, please format it as I said. So what can I include? -anything not on progarchives -anything in the Proto/related categories on PA -John Zorn and Miles Davis Edited by Pnoom! - August 07 2008 at 01:20 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
Blank.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
DAMN YOU FOLLY THIS IS MY TURF.
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=46093 08's list was already done and 09 was going to start up around December. Edited by moreitsythanyou - July 31 2008 at 21:47 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
And you didn't even vote in the song list yet. Only 10 more days!!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
My list will have a fairer scoring system.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
Elaborate.
If you can not tell, I am seriously displeased. |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
Well, according to your list, an album that is ranked #1 is 250 times better than an album ranked #250. I would add a bonus simply for making the list, meaning that being #1 would only be ten times better than being #250 (or, in the case of my list, five times better than being #100). |
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
I can't say that I follow you. The bonus seems linear and would not make any real difference.
But still, I had a system going with this. I really can't believe you'd just butt in. |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
I admit I didn't notice your thread.
The bonus would make a difference. Say I put Can's Ege Bamyasi at #1, and nobody else puts it anywhere. It gets 100 points on your system. Suppose 99 people put Tago Mago at #100, and nobody else puts it anywhere. It gets 99 points from you. So EB>TM even though 99 people prefer TM. But in my system, if EB is at #1, then if 6 people put TM at #100, it ends up above EB. See the difference now? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
If it really bothers you, though, I can just have this thread deleted.
It would be interesting to see the comparison between the two scoring methods, though. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
||
While itsy's weighting may be too low, I would argue that yours is too high. |
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
I admit, I like your system, or one with a slightly less generous curve. I'd love to implement it.
I know it was an honest mistake, but I'd appreciate waiting until December. Then, explain to me your system and I think it will benefit the list. I was thinking of a way to do that, I just didn't know how. I figured I could come up with some sort of curve formula but didn't have the motivation. Edited by moreitsythanyou - July 31 2008 at 22:16 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
That was an arbitrary example. I could easily make it any number. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
||
Indeed, the devil is in the details. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
I chose such a high weighting to show how much of a difference it could make. Somewhere between 10-15 would probably be a better choice.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
Although I was rather angry before, I admit this topic turned out to be a bit of a blessing in disguise because now I have the idea of scaling scores based on different multipliers based on the number of votes received. Probably in increments of between .05 and .15 per vote. I'll be implementing this switch as soon as the song list if it works well.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pnoom! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
![]() |
||
Is your album list finished? If it is, I'd say go ahead with this one with the new scoring. If it isn't, this thread can be closed and you can implement the scoring on the album list, too.
Also, I'm a bit baffled why you were so upset over a simple misunderstanding. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
||
Maybe he's pregnant. I know my wife gets pretty cranky when she's pregnant.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
The album list finished months ago, but I'll be switching up the scoring for the song list which is currently under way. Well my first post was a bit more a joking tone (something I knew you wouldn't take too seriously ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
moreitsythanyou ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: April 23 2006 Location: NYC Status: Offline Points: 11682 |
![]() |
||
Oh and the album/song lists are meant to be annual and there will definitely be scoring changes for the 09 list.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |