Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Feelings about Genres
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFeelings about Genres

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Poll Question: Choose an option..
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
2 [3.03%]
18 [27.27%]
30 [45.45%]
16 [24.24%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
horsewithteeth11 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2008 at 17:43
Sometimes I wonder why people even make this a debate. Oh well, I vote it stay as it is anyway.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65701
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2008 at 17:46
^ cause it's fun..  we need good debates, the Progmetal Pioneers thread looks like it might get good too
Back to Top
darkshade View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 19 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 10964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2008 at 17:49
keep it as it is

however, the jazz-fusion section needs a bit of a make-over. and a damn bigger description than just a couple of sentences. not to mention the fact that the section is missing key players in the evolution of the genre (*cough* Miles Davis *cough* Larry Young *cough* etc... *cough*)
Back to Top
Dim View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2008 at 18:19
More subgenres, or at least keep the subgenres as they are, but when you click on the subgebre, thee are different catagories under that subgenre.
 
Like post rock...
 
Epic post rock- GYBE, JXlll
Guitar Driven-EITS, Mogwai
Math rock influenced- 65daysofstatic, Tera Melos
Experimental-Red Sparrows, Ulver
 
I've brought this idea up a couple of times, it barely ever gets recognized.
 
The way I see it is, with more subgenres, there are more bands with albums in the definative top twenty, therefore more bands being recognized, or lesser known ones getting exposure. Just my thinking process...
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2008 at 21:52
Personally I would like a more specific genre typing.
 
I think most neo prog will fit under the symph label. and some will fit better under either metal or other generic labels.
 
diversity within general labelling will be a cruel but good way to create more specific labels.
 
so for me its less labels, more sublabels.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2008 at 04:56
Haven't read the thread!!
 
My position:
 
Too many genres especially since the breakdown of Progmetal and Art Rock. I won't expand again on how I'm discouraged art this situation.
 
 
The only staisfying solution is the multi-genre belonging.
 
I can't see how hard that would so hard to implement.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Avantgardehead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2008 at 05:02
Like I've always said, I'd love to see the genres deleted entirely and a tagging or grouping/similar artist function replacing it.
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
Back to Top
meat puppet View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: March 23 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2008 at 05:19
I'm really struggling with these genres anyway. Having read the multitude of arguments as to what specifically is progressive music is one that I find impossible to answer. For the most part prog seems to consist of longer passages of music than most bands produce (I cant even decide what that would be), this puts all classical music into prog (which makes sense because many bands have pilfered famous composers work), the thing that differentiates rock from classical appears to be the use of a drumset throughout most of the performance.

So that puts bands such as Metallica and Iron Maiden as progressive rock Confused Its all down to personal interpretation and virtually eveyone will disagree. If you spent your life listening to a band like 'Yes' then you will base your views around bands that have a similar style. I hear elements of these bands in Janes Addiction and The Meat Puppets neither of which would be classified as prog on this forum (I can pick a track by JA that you would swear was Yes in their heyday and a track by the MP that sounds like Robert Fripp wrote it)

I think its all just music really with our own personal stamp on it. Anything, everything and nothing is progressive. Sometimes you can be listening so intently for what you recognise that you miss the real progressions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_9INBPUX9U


So, open it, forget the genres and describe the music in comparison to other bands.


Edited by meat puppet - April 05 2008 at 05:23
Back to Top
Jack-in-the-Green View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: February 02 2008
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2008 at 10:28
...Reduce them
Sorry if i have spelling mistakes, english is not my mother tongue.



http://www.last.fm/user/grumfossil
Back to Top
laplace View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2008 at 12:07
Originally posted by schizoid_man77 schizoid_man77 wrote:

More subgenres, or at least keep the subgenres as they are, but when you click on the subgebre, thee are different catagories under that subgenre.
 
Like post rock...
 
Epic post rock- GYBE, JXlll
Guitar Driven-EITS, Mogwai
Math rock influenced- 65daysofstatic, Tera Melos
Experimental-Red Sparrows, Ulver
 
I've brought this idea up a couple of times, it barely ever gets recognized.
 
The way I see it is, with more subgenres, there are more bands with albums in the definative top twenty, therefore more bands being recognized, or lesser known ones getting exposure. Just my thinking process...


Aargh. =) There comes a point where you're over-compartmentalizing (neato word) certain things and ignoring other progressive genres yet to have been documented here as a consequence. Please don't flesh out the post-x genre like this until it's really overflowing, OK?
Back to Top
Okocha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 13 2007
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 681
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 11:47
Keep it as it is
Back to Top
darksideof View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 22 2007
Location: Newark N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 2318
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 12:07
went I started listening to prog in the early 80's. KIng Crimson Pink Floyd, RUSH, kansas, Supertramp, Jethro Tull, ELP,YES, VDGG, Gente Giants, Vangelis, Kitaro, Tangerine Dream were called just progressive music.
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 13:04
There should be two genres:

1. Good prog
2. Bad prog

... and I get to decide! Wink
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
MusicalSalmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 23 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 13:38
What the world needs is really to ditch all genres, and just talk about the individual bands instead of trying to put different bands under the same label... Progressive Rock has a very big issue here because different prog rock bands are all very very very different, and this is not because of different subgenres really, it is more because "different" bands get lumped into the category that is "prog rock". However since this was not part of the poll, i'll go with "keep it as it is" because it is the safest way, and im assuming that those who work with this site are doing their job well. the number 1 option is a bit weird though, because i dont see how fans of prog metal, post rock, avant-garde etc would fare with their favorite bands being called prog rock lol.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 19:32
If anything, the proliferation of genres )especially the metal spectrum( has been meant to help PA members in their search for music they might like or love. Having only one genre sounds great. But could you see if someone like Rocktopus was just starting here. And what if the first 10 reviews he read where mostly from bands like Death, Mastodon, and Barclay James Harvest. Could you see that he might not think much of "prog" as a genre ?
The Eclectic tag is not really an improvement over Art Rock. But Art Rock was just like the current Eclectic in the sense that many bands end up there because they don't really fit anywhere else. Heavy Prog is good one, as it really identifies an aspect of prog that isn't metal, but not mellow.
And while Neo seems like a good fit for, or in some more negative comments, a piss poor offspring of Symphonic, there is still a certain stylistic similarity to justify its' existence. Whether you want to dismiss is as symphonic music based on 80s' rock, or declare it but a mere shadow of a copy of symphonic, whatever. It still does have its' own sound.
If you want to make it simple, would you prefer to just have it divided up based on the main or lead instrument - mellotron prog, guitar , keyboard, hammond organ, bass & drum, violin etc ? Could you see how this could also be of little help to "searchers" in terms of serving as a guide to the different types of progressive music ?

Just view the different genres as a guide, nothing more. Not the definitive description, not the last adjective for ever; just an aggregation of like sounding music that once you find one or a few bands that you like, you may want to check others in the same genre.


Edited by debrewguy - April 07 2008 at 19:36
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 20:13
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

keep it as it is

however, the jazz-fusion section needs a bit of a make-over. and a damn bigger description than just a couple of sentences. not to mention the fact that the section is missing key players in the evolution of the genre (*cough* Miles Davis *cough* Larry Young *cough* etc... *cough*)


A comment on Miles Davis here - one of the top Jazz musicians, nay all musicians of all time. But it seems like every one wants to include him in their "club" a badge of their artistic worth. He's in the Rock n Roll Hall of Fame. Why ? His Jazz Fusion albums. Yet, most of his career, most of his work is not jazz fusion. Most of his classics are not jazz fusion. Heck, even his so-called jazz fusion masterpieces have their share of dissidents within both the jazz world and the rock world (which these albums were supposed to be a link). Should we include Dave Burbeck, with his Time Out album, Blue Rondo with its', at that time, exotic time signatures. Also consider his being taught by Milhaud (classical music connection), and the piano style that included that background. But, Brubeck's not cool, Man .
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.